• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Scientology's real failings.

Big Les

Philosopher
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
5,057
Location
UK
With all the hoo-hah over Jett Travolta boiling down to gossip and speculation, I thought it was time to take a look at Scientology claims. One good thing that has come of the former incident though, is that some have focussed upon the current "interpretation" of Scientology "doctrine". Although in comparison to mainstream religion it is still very proscriptive and hardly at all progressive, there is still room for an argument that Scientology is moving and changing with the times - that critics are hung up on the past.

I think this recent video series (amongst other things!) shows otherwise;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvoNUOIDT9I

21 parts - worth the watch even if your brain feels like its melting after a while.

The same old 1950s Dianetics pseudoscience, repackaged for the attention deficit generation, as far as I can see. All I've seen in 9 years of observation and 1 year of activism tells me that Scientology is stuck in the past, unable to adapt to the times, becoming less relevant as days go by. Of course, this doesn't mean that it won't continue to gain some adherents, and it certainly doesn't mean that individuals won't make some reinterpretations where possible. That, however, tends to result in them having to leave the "church" and set up on their own or join a smaller group - going "Free Zone".
 
Big, Big, BigBigBig Big, Big, you -you're glib. You're glib, Big.

I'm frightened that otherwise intelligent seeming people get taken by this stuff. I'm among those who can't fathom the appeal. This should be a good thread.
 
I can't be glib. I'm wearing a black roll-neck and a manic grin as I type this ;)

As a bonus, a link to the wikileaks version of the "Assists Handbook". The "Bring Back to Life Assist" on p217 always seemed a particularly dangerous aspect of belief to me. It's one thing to suggest that you might see your loved one in another life. But to think you might be able to bring them back from death itself? And has a Scientologist ever gone for the MDC, I wonder?

ETA - Scans of the necromancy pages of a modern edition of the assists handbook here and here.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom