Ron Paul gets even nuttier...

dudalb

Penultimate Amazing
dudalb
Joined
Aug 9, 2007
Messages
64,271
Location
Sacramento
Up until now, Ron Paul has pretty much confined his conspiracy theories to the NAFTA nonsense. But in a interview in the wake of Obama's election, Paul seems to be totally buying in the "Vast Global Conspriacy" Theory.

http://www.nationalexpositor.com/News/1474.html


Wow.Just wow.
I think now we now why Paul did not distance himself from the conspiracy kooks who filled his campaign: He Is One.
 
NWO would be imposible. One world government with one religion? No way. NWO idea is insane. It just doesn"t make any sense.
 
Ron Paul said:
I think McCain was obviously a back up candidate in case something happened where Obama didn’t win, they’d have been satisfied with McCain, but they have been positioning Obama for a long long time.
Click to expand...


Going on a three-day meth binge isn't really the most dignified way to deal with not getting elected, dude. :p
 
dudalb said:
Up until now, Ron Paul has pretty much confined his conspiracy theories to the NAFTA nonsense. But in a interview in the wake of Obama's election, Paul seems to be totally buying in the "Vast Global Conspriacy" Theory.

http://www.nationalexpositor.com/News/1474.html


Wow.Just wow.
I think now we now why Paul did not distance himself from the conspiracy kooks who filled his campaign: He Is One.
Click to expand...

Who are the nuts who started the war on drugs? Not Ron Paul.
 
Drudgewire said:
Going on a three-day meth binge isn't really the most dignified way to deal with not getting elected, dude. :p
Click to expand...

I have not heard that McCain went on a three-day meth binge, but I know he is getting old and takes alot of medication.
 
Just riduculous. Global government? Is Ron Paul talking about a place like North Korea?
 
Drudgewire said:
Going on a three-day meth binge isn't really the most dignified way to deal with not getting elected, dude. :p
Click to expand...

That little "Obama was the Back up" statement by Paul was what made me think "The guy has gone to a whole new level of nuttiness".
 
moon1969 said:
NWO would be imposible. One world government with one religion? No way. NWO idea is insane. It just doesn"t make any sense.
Click to expand...

I agree the NWO is insane. George Bush is insane for proposing it on Sepytember, 11, 1991. I oppose the NWO.
 
You folks have more patience than I do. This is as far as I read in that article:

"Appearing live on the Alex Jones show ..."
 
Last edited:
shuize said:
You folks have more patience than I do. This is as far as I read in that article:

"Appearing live on the Alex Jones show ..."
Click to expand...

Got news for you, but Ron Paul has been appearing on Jones' show for over 10 years.
 
Colin Powell is a liar and clown but hardly a NWO guy. Biden is a loudmouth. Everybody who is calling Zbigniew Brzezinski a russian hater might want to look what their russian heroes did to Afghanistan during 1979-1989. 1 million dead afghans and 6 million displaced afghans. That is what Russia did to Afghanistan on 1979-1989. And they are still doing that to Chechnya with their puppet Kadyrov.
 
Fortunately for Paul he's still safe. He's a congressman and as a rule about congressmen no one knows who their damn congressman is. Right now there's a guy sitting in Texas' 14th district thinking "Whew, I'm glad Ron Paul doesn't represent me!"
 
Galileo said:
You don't believe the United Nations exists? That is bat-**** crazy.
Click to expand...

The UN is an entity which controls the actions of the entire world? I always thought they were a confederation of voluntary member states designed to prevent large-scale international conflict and open dialogue in a neutral environment! Silly me...
 
Last edited:
As is often the case, you clear away the nuttiness and you get a grain of truth:

“Just as a Republican Congress wouldn’t say boo to a Republican Congress, you know that the Democratic Congress is NEVER going to stand up.”

“I think it is very dangerous and the first year is going to be the most dangerous year.” Paul stated. “Just think of Bush’s first year, he also had the 9/11 thing that he could use to scare everybody to death. And Obama will use the financial crisis, which will get worse, and there will be more military skirmishes around the world.” Paul asserted.

...

“It’s the philosophy of the Bush doctrine, which was that we have the right to preemptively strike anybody and then he even expanded that recently by saying we don’t have to invade and conquer, but we have the right to go in and bomb anybody without their permission, and that’s why we go into Pakistan and Syria, which are acts of war. So they have the tools to do it and the sentiment and most Americans are oblivious to what is happening.”
Click to expand...

All "hope" and "change" hype aside, I think that many Americans are worried that Obama won't be that much different from Bush. Paul speaks to that, albeit in a very paranoid, conspiracy-minded way.
 
Kthulhut Fhtagn said:
The UN is an entity which controls the actions of the entire world? I always thought they were a confederation of voluntary member states designed to prevent large-scale international conflict and open dialogue in a neutral environment! Silly me...
Click to expand...
And they fail spectacularly at that.
 
Galileo said:
You don't believe the United Nations exists? That is bat-**** crazy.
Click to expand...

The United Nations tried, but could not stop Bosnia and Croatia from attacking one another in 1993.

The United Nations tried, but could not stop NATO from bombing Bosnia in 1995.

The United Nations tried, but could not stop the United States from bombing Iraq in 1998.

The United Nations tried, but could not stop NATO from attacking Serbia in 1999.

The United Nations tried, but could not stop the United States from invading Afghanistan in 2001, and Iraq in 2003.

The United Nations tried, but could not stop Russia from invading Georgia in 2008.

The United Nations has tried, but has been functionally unable to end the Israeli-Palestine conflict.

The United Nations has tried, but has been functionally unable to end civil war in the Congo region.

The United Nations has tried, but has been functionally unable to end North Korea's nuclear weapons program.

I cannot decide what is more pathetic: the performance history of the United Nations, or the claim that the United Nations is supposed to be some all-powerful world government.
 
dudalb, you clearly see the world as the media tells you. You clearly don't think for yourself. And you clearly are ignorant about a lot of issues. What can you offer the world that the other drones can't?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom