Johnny Pneumatic
Master Poster
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2003
- Messages
- 2,088
CaveDave said:Just make the entire structure roughly neutrally buoyant, Compensate for leakage of (leak-finding-small-molecule) buoyancy gas then solve the problem of bearing assemblies that don't waste too much energy, and while you're at, what does the spin do to the pilot/payload/supercargo/drive system, and then figure out how to handle strong/variable winds.
Nothing to it.![]()
![]()
Dave
SkepticJ said:Would the "smoke ring" airship idea here work? If so that'd also mean submarines could work like that as well, since hydrodynamics is just aerodynamics in a thicker medium?
SkepticJ said:since hydrodynamics is just aerodynamics in a thicker medium?
geni said:Air compresses water does not. this is a very important consideration.
SkepticJ said:Would the "smoke ring" airship idea here work? If so that'd also mean submarines could work like that as well, since hydrodynamics is just aerodynamics in a thicker medium?
I don't know. With a slight modification, using the rigid prolate spheroidal bladders that the author of the article suggests, it would probably work fairly similarly to a rotor-sail. It would still need to be lighter-than-air, since there wouldn't be enough force to power a heavier-than-air craft. Not sure if it would be faster or more efficient than a conventional blimp, though.Ziggurat said:Yes, it could literally work with a boyant aircraft like a blimp, but it would be fantastically inefficient (as in I doubt you could even overcome more than the mildest of breezes), and there's no way you could ever hope to run a heavier-than-air craft using this idea.