Firstly, greetings. I haven't posted for years so I may as well be a newbie.
I have been trying to make my way in the world as a freelance writer, usually covering health topics. I consider myself to be a reasonably skilled Googler but sometimes I find it very difficult to obtain the research I need. I usually end up with a bunch of abstracts for each topic and tend to cobble the rest from "reliable" websites or books. This isn't the worst thing in the world but it's not ideal. Sometimes I try to source the references from other articles, only to find out the abstracts are not available online or available to health professionals only. (I must also point out that my local libraries are not particularly helpful either, with very few recent books or periodicals.)
When I was a psychiatric nurse, I had an Athens account that gave me access to several electronic databases, which in turn led me to the research I needed. More digging was required to get to the actual articles, but I got there in the end, thanks to an excellent university library. Now that I'm no longer a health professional, I do not get this access, even though I am more than willing to pay for it. How am I expected to produce quality articles that reflect the truth, when the truth isn't always accessible?
This is very frustrating, though perhaps I am over-thinking it or trying to be too thorough. There are some good sources out there but I find it irritating that there are more that I can't access, meaning I might miss something. I also appreciate that these organisations and journals need to make their money (perhaps that's a debate for another day) but I feel that research should be open to the public.
I have been trying to make my way in the world as a freelance writer, usually covering health topics. I consider myself to be a reasonably skilled Googler but sometimes I find it very difficult to obtain the research I need. I usually end up with a bunch of abstracts for each topic and tend to cobble the rest from "reliable" websites or books. This isn't the worst thing in the world but it's not ideal. Sometimes I try to source the references from other articles, only to find out the abstracts are not available online or available to health professionals only. (I must also point out that my local libraries are not particularly helpful either, with very few recent books or periodicals.)
When I was a psychiatric nurse, I had an Athens account that gave me access to several electronic databases, which in turn led me to the research I needed. More digging was required to get to the actual articles, but I got there in the end, thanks to an excellent university library. Now that I'm no longer a health professional, I do not get this access, even though I am more than willing to pay for it. How am I expected to produce quality articles that reflect the truth, when the truth isn't always accessible?
This is very frustrating, though perhaps I am over-thinking it or trying to be too thorough. There are some good sources out there but I find it irritating that there are more that I can't access, meaning I might miss something. I also appreciate that these organisations and journals need to make their money (perhaps that's a debate for another day) but I feel that research should be open to the public.
Last edited: