• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
Maybe the youtube snowman will ask Paul why so many of his supporters are racists, cranks, pimps, or just plain nuts.

:popcorn1
 
Last edited:
Maybe the youtube snowman will ask Paul why so many of his supporters are racists, cranks, pimps, or just plain nuts.

:popcorn1

Thirty minutes into the "debate" Ron Paul finally gets to speak in response to the North American Union highway and the challenge to our national sovereignty.
 
Huckabee...
notice the cadence of his voice...body language....gestures....

If I didn't know better I'd swear he'd studied NLP as taught by Tony Robbins.

-z
 
Thirty minutes into the "debate" Ron Paul finally gets to speak in response to the North American Union highway and the challenge to our national sovereignty.
I don't suppose there's the slightest chance he responded by explaining that it's a looneytunes conspiracy theory that appeals exclusively to people who should be kept in padded rooms.
 
I don't suppose there's the slightest chance he responded by explaining that it's a looneytunes conspiracy theory that appeals exclusively to people who should be kept in padded rooms.

Heh, nope. He said that "The NAFTA super highway and NAU are real. The information is out there for you to find. It is a conspiracy of ideologies." Or some such nonsense.
 
My highlights summary:

Romney was successful at deflecting Giuliani's attack on hiring illegal immigrants.

McCain liked to kick Ron Paul, who got mixed cheers and boos, for being anti-war and isolationist.

McCain's "veto pen" wasn't a very successful prop.

Giuliani's ad had good jokes about him reducing snow levels in NY.Thompson's ad was really mean, attacked Romney and Huckabee. Most everyone made fun of Hillary.

Huckabee got a lot of questions and preformed favorably. He successfully rebutted immigration scholarship claims.

Ron Paul said he was a Republican all the way.

Thompson was really slow and really really old and tired looking, McCain seemed less energetic as well.

Tancredo was still a ***.

Hunter likes guns, that's all I learned about him.

Best moment:

Gay soldier kicks all their asses, in video and in person. **** yeah.

I declare him the winner of the debate.
 
Each of the candidates had their staff prepare a YouTube video for the campaign. Fred Thompson's ad said nothing about Fred Thompson, and was simply an attack ad against Romney and Huckabee.

Fred Thompson brings nothing to the table.
 
And Mike Huckabee looked like a lunatic when he joined Ron Paul in calling for the elimination of the IRS.
 
Last edited:
Maybe the youtube snowman will ask Paul why so many of his supporters are racists, cranks, pimps, or just plain nuts.

:popcorn1


That may be true - but would make me wonder what Giuliani-supporters
are? "America-hating, stupid, masochist, war-mongering, tax-wasting-loving,
morality-denying ... ?" - nuff said... :p
 
Last edited:
Thirty minutes into the "debate" Ron Paul finally gets to speak in response to the North American Union highway and the challenge to our national sovereignty.
It's a shame though that the "North American Union" and "NAFTA superhighway" are complete and utter myths.

It goes to show it's really not that hard to get folks to believe in stuff that's totally not true. Just distort a couple of basic facts, leave out a few others, repeat a few key buzzwords, and you're good to go.
 
Huckabee is so likeable. Shame he is a fundie.

I was suprised by being slightly impressed by Ron Paul on a few moments of the debate, but on abortion the man returned to a blittering nutcase and completely chickened out.

Rudy had the guts to say he would not overturn Rowe Vs Wade. And given his performance, I'm hoping he gets in on 08' (Obama as his running mate would be a dream).
 
I think Huckabee won that debate, and I am no fan of Huckabee. (Go Ron Paul!)

Thompson and McCain looked like it was past their respective bedtimes.
 
Why? Because the federal government was never designed to be anywhere remotely as big as it is and States should be handling at least 50% of what the Federal Government has its hands in.
 
Why? Because the federal government was never designed to be anywhere remotely as big as it is and States should be handling at least 50% of what the Federal Government has its hands in.

Random question: Are you actually just arguing for decentralisation, rather than actually a significantly smaller governement?
 
Random question: Are you actually just arguing for decentralisation, rather than actually a significantly smaller governement?

I'm arguing for a smaller federal government like the one intended by the founders of the country. If an individual State wants to have a bloated government, so be it. I can then move to one that doesn't.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if Ron Paul's allegience to the GOP will actually hurt him,since a lot of his supporters really are gearing up for a Independent run,since it is pretty clear his chances of getting the Nomination are minimal at best.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if Ron Paul's allegience to the GOP will actually hurt him,since a lot of his supporters really are gearing up for a Independent run,since it is pretty clear his chances of getting the Nomination are minimal at best.

Maybe he'll do a Unity ticket while still keeping the Republican label.
 

Back
Top Bottom