Edit: Oops! Sorry, this should be in the "religion and philosophy" forum. Putting it there now.
It seems to me, and I would like the views of both the religious and the religiously skeptic, that every modern-day religion is set up so that, regardless of how you feel about a situation, you are justified.
Some examples from the Bible (because, well, it's just sooooooo easy) that have shaped the course of history:
Slavery is both condemned and condoned.
Killing is both condemned and condoned.
Thievery (particularly of land) is both condemned and condoned.
Warfare is both condemned and condoned.
Money laundering and extortion is both condemned and condoned. (You cannot bribe God, but you must tithe.)
Tolerance for other religions is both condemned and condoned.
The reason I bring this up is because a few nights ago, on The O'Reilly Factor, there was a Muslim guest speaking about how "radical Muslims" are misinterpreting religious texts. I am wondering - how can you misinterperet texts that justify you, whatever your position is?
It seems to me, and I would like the views of both the religious and the religiously skeptic, that every modern-day religion is set up so that, regardless of how you feel about a situation, you are justified.
Some examples from the Bible (because, well, it's just sooooooo easy) that have shaped the course of history:
Slavery is both condemned and condoned.
Killing is both condemned and condoned.
Thievery (particularly of land) is both condemned and condoned.
Warfare is both condemned and condoned.
Money laundering and extortion is both condemned and condoned. (You cannot bribe God, but you must tithe.)
Tolerance for other religions is both condemned and condoned.
The reason I bring this up is because a few nights ago, on The O'Reilly Factor, there was a Muslim guest speaking about how "radical Muslims" are misinterpreting religious texts. I am wondering - how can you misinterperet texts that justify you, whatever your position is?
Last edited: