DangerousBeliefs
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2003
- Messages
- 1,299
Our good friend Kumar has put forth a challenge - Prove the Earth is round.
Unfortunately, he added clauses like Prove the Earth is round "to an idiot".
So, how about it folks?
I can think of a mathematical proof, that of Eratosthenes from around 230 BC.
He basically took measurements at two different spots on the Earth and used these to figure the circumference... showing the Earth is a near circle.
I would also add that if one goes onto a high mountain, she should be able to see "the other end of the Earth" if it was flat. Since it is not, one could potentially use basic geometry to figure the angles and come up with a rough circumference.
This all assumes that math is correct and 1 + 1 = 2 (a stretch, I know).
Beyond that, I'm thinking shooting Kumar into space might be the next best option.
Any other ideas on proving the Earth is round without photography?
Unfortunately, he added clauses like Prove the Earth is round "to an idiot".
So, how about it folks?
I can think of a mathematical proof, that of Eratosthenes from around 230 BC.
He basically took measurements at two different spots on the Earth and used these to figure the circumference... showing the Earth is a near circle.
I would also add that if one goes onto a high mountain, she should be able to see "the other end of the Earth" if it was flat. Since it is not, one could potentially use basic geometry to figure the angles and come up with a rough circumference.
This all assumes that math is correct and 1 + 1 = 2 (a stretch, I know).
Beyond that, I'm thinking shooting Kumar into space might be the next best option.
Any other ideas on proving the Earth is round without photography?
Kumar said:Mr.devefoc& others,
It is not a right approach to reject any existing aspect just because it could not be seen properly. I can also speak as under:-
Prove me the earth is round or oval not flat
Any aspect unless experienced or seen personally & physically by the majority of world population, can not be taken as proved. All the camera photography can be just a trick photography & all the mentionings or teachings can be just a hypnotisms for the Vested Interests i.e. money, popularity & publicities. One of the said best achievement of CS is that they made earth as round/oval from flat but not yet seen/experianced physically by majority of world's population. Science can not confirm/prove it unless this majority check it like a ball in their fingers. Whereas, in all practical & physical experiences it is flat. If it is round like a ball how we can stand errect & stable. How water & things on it are stable. I say it can be fake mentionig that it is round/oval because all the things can be stable on flat surface not on round surface.
Most of the scientific new research may work in this manner. Whereas homeopathy along with other sprituals are physically experianced by this majority.
In the above considerations, how you can prove Current science & disprove homeopathy along with other sprituals?