Proposition 19 on the California ballot would legalize marijuana. I'm inclined to vote for it but an Anti-19
article has some arguments against it. One I have no knowledge of at all:
What's the skinny here? Is this a valid concern?
Well, compared to most of the "reefer madness" arguments I've seen, this is at least somewhat rational.
I live on the other coast, but I would imagine many California gardeners enjoy many of the same breeds of palm and hibiscus that we do. After a heavy rain, there can be a somewhat "funky" smell, especially when the palms drop their seeds. Since hibiscus have no flowery smell, the smell of trapped, stagnant water can become noticeable (compare to, say, angel trumpets, which hold more water, but have an overwhelming, pungent flowery smell). Every once in awhile a get a whiff of something that might be mistaken for some marijuana, but I assure you, my garden is for looking and eating only. Usually I'm smelling trapped or stagnant water; the traveler palm for example holds water which can cause old growth to rot and stink a bit.
When grown inside inside in a dense, controlled "pot farm", marijuana does offer a rather pungent smell, but when outside, even the most pungent flowers are hard to notice from more than 10-20 feet away. I once had a roommate who grew a few pot plants among some weeds in a shared backyard, and no one noticed until he started bragging about it- no smell, not even noticeable plants among the other weeds. If not for a few pothead roommates, I myself would probably never have realized what it was.
But here is an argument for those who think pot is a silly plant, and people should find better things to do than smoke it: it costs an average of
roughly $23,000 per year to keep a non-violent offender locked-up. Is it really worth $20k to stop a few potheads from killing braincells? Is that really the best use of this money?
Back to the subject of California-
Schwarzenegger just decriminalized pot, making it a $100 fine. So it would seem to me the State of California is already 9/10ths the way there. And so far, even after YEARS of legal medical marijuana, no one can point to any increase in crime, or any other data that supports the arguments that this trend has caused any harm to the citizens of California.
In other words- the results are in- California has already semi-legalized pot, and the doom-sayers have been proven wrong beyond a reasonable doubt. Regarding the future, and Prop 19, the real question is this- does California want to make pot a source of revenue (via taxes), or continue tossing billions of dollars after a plant that will grow wild in the southern half of the state?