• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pope Francis, Ratzinger, Welby, Prince Phillip "sued" for satanic ritual abuse

Orphia Nay

Penguilicious Spodmaster
Tagger
Orphia Nay
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
52,440
Location
Australia
Pope Francis, Ratzinger, Welby, Prince Phillip "sued" for satanic ritual abuse

Our old friend Judy Byington has hitched her crazy wagon to Kevin Annett's conspiracy theory campaign train against, well, take your pick.

http://www.examiner.com/article/us-...n-global-leaders-satanic-child-sacrifice-cult

Prominent US and Canadian politicians and corporate officials were expected to be named by eyewitnesses to murder as being members of the Corona Novem, Crown, or Ninth Circle Satanic child sacrifice cult said ITCCS spokesperson Kevin Annett in today's phone interview. Annett's International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State case representing over 50,000 missing children began it's prosecution phase today at the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels Belgium.

US and Canadian politicians and corporate officials may join present defendants for the Brussels trial or await further investigation according to Annett. Already facing prosecution were Pope Francis, Jesuit Superior General Adolfo Pachon, Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, former Pope Joseph Ratzinger, UK High Court Justice Judge Fulford and members of the British Royal Family including Queen Elizabeth's husband Prince Phillip.
Click to expand...


Never heard of the International Common Law Court of Justice?

Natural and Customary Law allows for the establishment of popular courts of justice when the existing legal and governmental authorities are subverting the law and justice, or aiding those who do. Common Law arose historically to uphold the liberties of the people against tyranny, whether religious or secular, and accordingly, has universal jurisdiction when convened as a jury court by more than twelve duly sworn men and women.

The International Common Law Court of Justice (ICLCJ) was established as the legal and judicial arm of the International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and state (ITCCS), with the help of legal experts, judges and survivors of church terror and imperial genocide in more than a dozen countries.
Click to expand...

I'm sure this will be a resounding victory for Mr Annett and his court. ;)

kangaroo-court.jpg
 
carlitos said:
An article from the Examiner misspells "its." Shocka.
Click to expand...

I'm glad I'm not the only one who double checked the source upon seeing that.

I would pay money to watch this "trial." But then indulging the insane never results in good things.
 
I doubt there's going to be a trial. Expect a summary dismissal for any or all of: failure to state a case, lack of standing, improper venue, and god knows what else. They'll probably be lucky to get away without being declared vexatious litigants.

The legal system, despite its many flaws, does have some experience in dealing with crazy people.
 
Black Hole Box said:
I'm glad I'm not the only one who double checked the source upon seeing that.

I would pay money to watch this "trial." But then indulging the insane never results in good things.
Click to expand...

I disagree. Get the right kind of insane, provide pitchfork, send to this trial...hilarity insues.

But then, that assumes my idea doesn't fall afoul of your second sentence, as well.

:D
 
My ideal scenario:

Prince Phillip turns up. Takes the stand and says: "What is this? People think I'm racist, but the only reason I am here is because I happen to have married a reptile-European. What exactly is it you bigots have against good honest, green skinned shape changers? Is it because they are migrants to this planet? You sirs, are terrible! Operation Con Trail can not happen too soon!"
 
xtifr said:
I doubt there's going to be a trial. Expect a summary dismissal for any or all of: failure to state a case, lack of standing, improper venue, and god knows what else. They'll probably be lucky to get away without being declared vexatious litigants.

The legal system, despite its many flaws, does have some experience in dealing with crazy people.
Click to expand...


It's their own Court.
 
Thank you for pointing me to this. In by now several decades of having kook-watching as a hobby (I got bitten by the bug as a teenager, long before there was the internet), this Kevin Annett guy and his entirely fictional "International Common Law Court of Justice", somehow managed to fly below my radar. And this court is actually supposed to be based in Belgium, of all places. What is it with these people that they can't even keep up some remote semblance of verisimilitude? Couldn't he at least have located his imaginary, secret and entirely anonymously-staffed “Common Law” court in a country that actually has some connection to Common Law (IOW, basically Britain, or even more correctly England, and its former colonies), instead of in Belgium, a place that at no point of its history was ever subject to Common Law in any way, shape or form?

Another wonderful aspect is that Kevin Annett also seems to be at the centre of a lot of one of my favourite forms of internet entertainment: kook-on-kook verbal bashing. At least some of his online detractors appear at least as loony as he is himself. Absolutely delightful.

I'm afraid that I actually already know the real answer to the “why, of all possible imaginary locations for an imaginary court, Brussels, Belgium?” question. He's a Canadian, apparently trying to primarily deceive people in Canada and the US. Pretending that his non-existent “court” is in Belgium must minimize, in his mind, the risk that someone is going to check up on him. Like, actually getting hold of a real address in Brussels and going to see if there's a “Court” in operation there.
 
FromBelgiumWithLove said:
Pretending that his non-existent “court” is in Belgium must minimize, in his mind, the risk that someone is going to check up on him.
Click to expand...
Eh? That's not very flattering to Belgium. Anyway I'm planning to go there in a couple of weeks and if someone can give me an address for the court, I will check it out. If it's in session I will sit in the public gallery.
 
Yes, the court's actual location is a mystery.

http://iclcj.com/

"The ITCCS operates from an undisclosed central headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, and from regional offices in Vancouver, New York, Dublin, London and Paris."

How are the defendants supposed to turn up to defend themselves? Oh, that's right, they're not.
 
Orphia Nay said:
Yes, the court's actual location is a mystery.

http://iclcj.com/

"The ITCCS operates from an undisclosed central headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, and from regional offices in Vancouver, New York, Dublin, London and Paris."

How are the defendants supposed to turn up to defend themselves? Oh, that's right, they're not.
Click to expand...
That's not very fair. I think they should have the right to defend themselves against charges like these, which are really quite serious.
Along with considerable documentation, the Prosecutor introduced notarized affidavit statements from eight eyewitnesses to these crimes, including videotaped interviews with two adolescent women who claim to have been tortured and raped by chief defendant Jorge Bergoglio, alias “Pope Francis”, during the spring of 2009 and 2010, at horrific cult functions connected to the “Ninth Circle” child sacrifice network.

“Survivors of these rituals describe newborn babies being chopped to pieces on stone altars, and their remains were then consumed by the participants”.
Click to expand...
http://itccs.org

I know the Pope can do largely what he likes in the Roman Church, but raping young women during religious ceremonies and then chopping babies to pieces on the altar before consuming them probably invalidates the whole ritual. Anyway that's what these pesky liberal Catholics will argue. It will cause no end of controversy about transubstantiation and infallibility. No way the Church needs that just now.
 
Last edited:
Orphia Nay said:
Yes, the court's actual location is a mystery.

http://iclcj.com/

"The ITCCS operates from an undisclosed central headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, and from regional offices in Vancouver, New York, Dublin, London and Paris."

How are the defendants supposed to turn up to defend themselves? Oh, that's right, they're not.
Click to expand...

The best way to enter a plea to this court is to write it on toilet paper and flush it down the toilet.
 
Craig B said:
That's not very fair. I think they should have the right to defend themselves against charges like these, which are really quite serious. http://itccs.org

I know the Pope can do largely what he likes in the Roman Church, but raping young women during religious ceremonies and then chopping babies to pieces on the altar before consuming them probably invalidates the whole ritual. Anyway that's what these pesky liberal Catholics will argue. It will cause no end of controversy about transubstantiation and infallibility. No way the Church needs that just now.
Click to expand...

As long as the priest said the magic words the baby flesh becomes Jesus flesh so eating it joins you with Jesus.

Praise the holy Bbque.
 
FromBelgiumWithLove said:
I'm afraid that I actually already know the real answer to the “why, of all possible imaginary locations for an imaginary court, Brussels, Belgium?” question. He's a Canadian, apparently trying to primarily deceive people in Canada and the US. Pretending that his non-existent “court” is in Belgium must minimize, in his mind, the risk that someone is going to check up on him. Like, actually getting hold of a real address in Brussels and going to see if there's a “Court” in operation there.
Click to expand...

Another, more important reason, I think is to give it some semblance of authority by associating through geography with the EU. Most people are aware that Brussels is the capital of the EU. In the same way as Scientology calls their free personality test the "Oxford Capacity Analysis" to suggest a link with the reputable university.

However, if you know a bit more about the EU than that, you'll realise that the (only) EU court, the ECJ, is based in Luxembourg. And that the ECHR, a court operated by the Council of Europe, a separate organisation, is based in Strasbourg. And that most or all UN-related courts are based in The Hague (maybe some in Geneva too). For people who know a bit more about international organisations, Brussels doesn't make sense at all as a seat of a court.

(which doesn't mean there aren't plenty of courts in Brussels. I recently found out that the municipality of Brussels alone, one of the 19 municipalities in the Brussels Capital Region, has 5 different small claims courts ("vredegerecht") and you have to get down to street level to find out which one has jurisdiction over your case).
 
Last edited:
ddt said:
... Brussels alone, one of the 19 municipalities in the Brussels Capital Region, has 5 different small claims courts ("vredegerecht") and you have to get down to street level to find out which one has jurisdiction over your case).
Click to expand...
In Belgium, accusations like this are dealt with in small claims courts? What counts as a serious matter?
... two adolescent women who claim to have been tortured and raped by chief defendant Jorge Bergoglio, alias “Pope Francis”, during the spring of 2009 and 2010, at horrific cult functions connected to the “Ninth Circle” child sacrifice network.

“Survivors of these rituals describe newborn babies being chopped to pieces on stone altars, and their remains were then consumed by the participants”.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom