• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Plankton proportions

Confuseling

Irreligious fanatic
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
1,243
Quick question - I've been googling around and trying to find out the relative proportions of different forms of plankton. What I really want to know is what proportion of them are photosynthetic - or to be slightly more honest, was I talking porkies when I said to a friend; "They're mostly plants..."

Either mass or sheer numbers. Any info useful. Hell, I'm young and liberal, let's have a plankton party. This is the plankton thread, in which any interesting facts or links about plankton belong. Go plankton crazy. :)
 
Quick question - I've been googling around and trying to find out the relative proportions of different forms of plankton. What I really want to know is what proportion of them are photosynthetic - or to be slightly more honest, was I talking porkies when I said to a friend; "They're mostly plants..."

My understanding -- and I don't have any cites to back this up at the moment -- is that asking what plankton is made up of is like asking what "rock" is made up of, or "food." Different areas, different times, different seasons, different environments --- even different pollutants --- all have an effect to the point that measuring "relative proportions" on a large scale isn't very meaningful.

Case in point: (Just look at the causal variables cited in a study of one site alone.)


A 2 year study of the phytoplankton community was carried out in the Indian River Lagoon, USA. In terms of biovolume, the phytoplankton community was generally dominated by dinoflagellates, diatoms or cyanobacteria. Mean phytoplankton standing crops were highest in the most flow-restricted regions of the lagoon, which had the lowest mean salinity values and comparatively high total nitrogen:total phosphorus ratios. In this region, blooms of dinoflagellates were common in the first year of the study, which was characterized by an El Niño event that yielded exceptionally high rainfall levels and freshwater outflow. Picoplanktonic cyanobacteria blooms became more prominent in the second year of the study, which was characterized by below average rainfall conditions. In unrestricted flow regions of the lagoon, located near inlets to the Atlantic Ocean, diatoms were most often the dominant taxa. Regions of intermediate water turnover rates and high external loading of phosphorus had a prevalence of diatom blooms. However, the average phytoplankton standing crops in the latter regions did not reach the levels experienced in the flow-restricted parts of the lagoon. In terms of individual phytoplankton taxa, the most common bloom-forming diatoms in the Indian River Lagoon system included: Skeletonema costatum, Dactyliosolen fragilissimus, Skeletonema menzelii, Cerataulina pelagica, Odontella regia, Chaetoceros lorenzianus, Rhizosolenia setigera and Thalassionema nitzschioides. The major bloom-forming dinoflagellate species included: Pheopolykrikos hartmannii, Akashiwo sanguinea, Prorocentrum micans, the potentially toxic species Pyrodinium bahamense var. bahamense and Prorocentrum minimum. Several picoplanktonic cyanobacteria were also prominent members of the phytoplankton community, including Synechococcus elongates. The spatial and temporal patterns observed in some of these dominant species were attributable to patterns in key environmental variables, including salinity, temperature and nutrient concentrations.
 
Rocks. Really small rocks, which keep moving ;)

Thanks for the input - that meets the 'interesting plankton facts' criteria, giving you the dubious distinction of being the first guest at my plankton party. C'est la vie.

With food or rocks, in aggregate, you could guess. You could even make an informed guess without data, for food - there's gotta be a lot more plant mass than animal, and more plants than animals, just because of biophysics and their relative size distributions (although actually thinking about it trees are really really big aren't they :)). Not true of plankton though, because I have no idea what the inputs are from outside the system - i.e. from dry land. Still, someone must have taken a stab at it. I expect high error margins, but that never stopped 'em before...
 
Last edited:
Quick question - I've been googling around and trying to find out the relative proportions of different forms of plankton. What I really want to know is what proportion of them are photosynthetic - or to be slightly more honest, was I talking porkies when I said to a friend; "They're mostly plants..."

Well, I'm going to spoil your party a little here. They're not mostly plants. They're mostly photosynthetic bacteria. :)

"Plankton" is a generic term that basically means "things that don't control where and how they move, but drift around with water or air." I know you meant the stuff in the ocean, but I thought I'd just add that bit, since my dictionary of systematics was kind enough to tell me about it.

Although it has already been noted that specific species composition varies by area (and if you're in a sewer outflow, there may be a lot of things you wouldn't expect elsewhere), the predominant type of organism in most plankton in most places is likely to be photosynthetic bacteria.

Here's an example from off the coast of California:

http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16938845

It may be hard to find through the jargon, but they show that the most common species in their sampling are two different types of photosynthetic bacteria. Indeed, the single most common photosynthetic organism on earth is one of these guys:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prochlorococcus
http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php/Prochlorococcus

...which was first identified via some clever work back in the late 80s (it's very small, and defied a lot of the normal methods of finding these bugs).

As for proportion, that's hard to say any better than "probably a majority of them." Since you said "mostly" I think you're in the clear. :)
 
Last edited:
Marine cyanobacteria are to date the smallest known photosynthetic organisms: Prochlorococcus is the smallest at just 0.5 to 0.8 micrometres across. Possibly they are also the most plentiful species on Earth: a single millilitre of surface seawater may contain 100,000 cells or more. Worldwide, there are estimated to be 100 octillion (10[to the power]29) individuals.[5] Prochlorococcus is ubiquitous between 40°N and 40°S and dominates in the oligotrophic (nutrient poor) regions of the oceans[6]. The bacterium accounts for an estimated 20% of the oxygen in the earth's atmosphere, and forms part of the base of the ocean food chain.[7]

From the wiiki. Wow - that's really a lot! Thanks for a very instructive response. I'm afraid the first link is beyond what I'm looking to wade into at the minute, but good to know it exists anyway. It sounds like you'd need some quite complex modeling to guess proportions at all - maybe nobody is even guessing. Interesting answer to the original question, in itself.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom