Where do these fit in to the overall picture of woo and skeptic? This place, for example, appears to be biased towards the existence of "psi" phenomena, despite any real evidence whatever. A search of the forum shows that they have an affiliated journal (the "European" journal), but I can find little else about the content and quality of their work.
I was aware of study carrying on (as well it should), but assumed that such courses taught and carried out their research from a skeptical standpoint. Is this, or any of the other courses being run worldwide, "legit" in terms of agenda, method and approach? How could a university, in good conscience, run a course that was not? Even Venkman et al were kicked out of their institution..
I was aware of study carrying on (as well it should), but assumed that such courses taught and carried out their research from a skeptical standpoint. Is this, or any of the other courses being run worldwide, "legit" in terms of agenda, method and approach? How could a university, in good conscience, run a course that was not? Even Venkman et al were kicked out of their institution..
