Like someone might point to
Creationist Claim CB144?
Something like that, yes.
Let me see if I can put together an example of a structure.
This is just a sketch to give folks an idea. It's based on 911myths.com. Each section would then have more-detailed subsections, as with the Anarchist FAQ or the Index to Creationist Claims.
Section A: Events Prior to 9/11/01
Section B: Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda
Section C: The Hijackers (Let's expand on this, as an example.)
C1: Hijacker Identities
C.1.100: Who were the hijackers?
(Reserve a whole "century" for these detailed questions, like the Index to Creationist Claims does.)
C.1.101: But didn't Mohammed Atta spell his name with a "Q"?
(Really nitty-gritty details get their own numbers.)
C.1.200: Did those named by the FBI really carry out the attacks?
C.1.300: The FBI have even admitted they don’t know who many of the hijackers were
C.1.4: The security camera footage claiming to show Hani Hanjour at Dulles airport on 9/11 actually shows someone else altogether
C.1.5: Many of those named as hijackers are still alive
C.1.6: How could the FBI have DNA samples of the alleged hijackers before 9-11?
C.1.7: The alleged hijackers don’t appear on the passenger manifests
C2: Hijacker Activities
C.2.1: The hijackers reportedly had girlfriends, drank alcohol, went clubbing, not the acts of fundamentalists
C.2.2: Mohammed Atta was a regular visitor to Jack Abramoffs casinos
C3: Hijacker Training
C.3.1: How could such sophisticated attacks have been carried out by a bunch of flight school dropouts?
C.3.2: Some of the hijackers were trained to fly by the US Government
C.3.3: A former German Defence Minister has confirmed the existence of Home Run, a remote control system present in all 757’s and 767’s
C.3.4: The planes were flown to their targets by remote control, not hijackers
C4: Hijacker Ties to Al Qaeda
C.4.1: Is there any evidence that these guys were working for Al Qaeda?
C5: The Moussaoui Case
C.5.1:
Does anybody have an example of a question or conspiracist claim for here?
C6: Other Questions
C.6.1: There’s no chance that one of the hijackers passports could be recovered from the WTC rubble
C+: Additional Resources and links (Each section should have one of these.)
Section D: Warnings and Foreknowledge
Section E: The U.S. Military on 9/11/01
Section F: The Twin Towers
Section G: World Trade Center 7
Section H: The Pentagon
Section I: Flight 93
Section J: Investigations (about the 9/11 Commission, NIST, FEMA, etc.)
Section K: Consequences (about Afghanistan, Iraq, poisonous air, etcetera)
Section L: Other 9/11 Claims (This could also include information about the 9/11 CTers in general and in particular. But it should be fact, not speculation!)
Appendix 1: Additional Material (This would be for existing debunking documents, like Gravy's and MarkyX's work.)
Appendix 2: Current Investigations and FOIA Requests (like what 911myths has now)
Appendix 3: 9/11 Updates (like what 911myths has now; also a repository for new information that needs to be incorporated into the main body of the FAQ)
This is just a sketch, for an example. Change it as needed. I have hybridized two different FAQ systems. I like the block-numbering used by the Index to Creationist Claims; it's kind of like the Library of Congress classification system.
And remember, each entry should be adequately sourced to both print and electronic resources. (Some web resources will disappear over time!) Use the power of hypertext; it is your friend.
What do you all think?
"
