I rest my case. Once again in that article, despite the text claiming there are pictures of police violence and brutality, the actual pictures shown just don't support that. In order:
A repeat of the picture of a bunch of masked rioters being chased by police.
A man lying on the floor next to a police bike.
A man being restrained by two police officers.
A man allegedly being kicked, although it looks to me more like he's being pushed away.
Another man being restrained on the floor.
A policeman grabbing a camera and apparently about to punch it.
A policeman looking angry.
A woman being restrained by three policemen.
A woman being carried by several police.
Again, I'm not saying any of these are definitely not police brutality. Any of these could easily show massive overreactions on the police's part. But the point is that the pictures simply don't tell us that. Without knowing why a person is being restrained and what happened in the lead up to the photo, a picture of the police restraining someone is just a picture of the police restraining someone. It could be a horribly violent abuse of power, or it could be the police doing exactly the job they're supposed to.
The only one that looks at all dodgy in its own right is the one of the policeman apparently about to throw a punch at a camera, which I'm pretty sure they're never supposed to do. But even that is ambiguous without knowing what was actually going on, why he was interested in the camera or the person holding it, and whether there was actually any punching. Hell, based on the position of his hand, it's ambiguous enough that he could be posing for a selfie. Unlikely, but just from that photo it's impossible to tell.
