NYC Ballot Initiative Update

jhunter1163

beer-swilling semiliterate
jhunter1163
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
25,902
Location
Connecticut, or King Arthur's Court. Hard to tell
www.takingaim.info

Jamieson and Gage appear on this program today. Jamieson is up first, and reports that they now have about 25,000 signatures. They've punted on 2008 and are now looking to try and get this on the ballot for 2009. Their spin is that it would be overshadowed by the presidential election anyway, so it's better to go for 2009 when there's a mayoral election.

After Jamieson, Gage gets on and spews his usual crap. I swear I could debunk that guy myself.
 
Is there any way to verify the actual number of signatures they collected? It wouldn't surprise me in the least if they inflate the numbers to make it seem like they got closer than they actually did.
 
Well, at some point they're going to have to turn them in. It's kind of a rule of thumb in signature-gathering that you should get twice what you need. Using that rule, I'd be very surprised if they even make it for 2009. After the presidential election, the whole idea of a new investigation would be pretty much moot, with no Bush or Cheney to kick around anymore. Most Americans just want Bush and Cheney out of office. They don't care about putting them in jail.
 
jhunter1163 said:
www.takingaim.info

Jamieson and Gage appear on this program today. Jamieson is up first, and reports that they now have about 25,000 signatures. They've punted on 2008 and are now looking to try and get this on the ballot for 2009. Their spin is that it would be overshadowed by the presidential election anyway, so it's better to go for 2009 when there's a mayoral election.

After Jamieson, Gage gets on and spews his usual crap. I swear I could debunk that guy myself.
Click to expand...

Here's a direct audio link to the show.

http://takingaimradio.com/mp3/takingaim080812.mp3

Jamieson comes on at about the 5:12 mark. He states they needed a minimum of 30K valid signatures. I haven’t been following this but would this be described as an epic fail or just an ordinary fail?
 
the chances of this actually passing are about....0.

the people of NYC...do not like 9-11 Truthers. please leave our city alone.
 
What happens, by law, if some of those signatures are from people who move out of New York to another part of the country before the 2008 elections and register in their new state of residence?
 
Drs_Res said:
What happens, by law, if some of those signatures are from people who move out of New York to another part of the country before the 2008 elections and register in their new state of residence?
Click to expand...

What happens if some of the signatories don't vote in the '08 election? Don't the signers have to have voted in the last election? They'll basically have to start all over again after the election if that's the case.
 
jhunter1163 said:
What happens if some of the signatories don't vote in the '08 election? Don't the signers have to have voted in the last election? They'll basically have to start all over again after the election if that's the case.
Click to expand...

That was my thought to begin with. I assumed that the signatures they gathered for the 2008 ballot were specifically for that ballot, and therefore would require them to start over for next year's ballot.

Can anyone confirm or deny this?
 
SO in other words they don't have nearly enough signatures but in true truth lying fashion they lie saying they do and make up an excuse to go another year in hopes that maybe by then they will be able to get enough.

Er uh I mean the presidential elections will overshadow it.. *cough*...like that wouldn't have been considered in the first place...
 
Jamieson On Hardfire 7/24/07

Hardfire 9-11 NEW YORK CITY BALLOT INITIATIVE / LES JAMIESON / GARY POPKIN - 28 min - Jul 24, 2007

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=63322162094980754&ei=MWKjSLWeLI6erwKO4-XqCw

Les was chatting this up over a year ago on Hardfire. The video is a real hoot if you've got the time to watch it. Jamieson's natural facial expression is a smirk so it's hard to tell if he's trying not to break up while slinging his BS.

Don't miss the bit starting at the 9:00 mark where Les lists the proposed ‘impartial’ commissioners (including two unnamed Nobel laureates!) who have ‘already accepted.’
 
Last edited:
Kinda reminds me a while back when all the twoofers were claiming that NWO would put the US under marshall law o a certain date. When that date came an nothing happened, they said it was postponed,

"Sorry folks, totalitarian rule has been rained out. We'll let you know when the new date is. "
 
Jonnyclueless said:
Kinda reminds me a while back when all the twoofers were claiming that NWO would put the US under marshall law o a certain date. When that date came an nothing happened, they said it was postponed,

"Sorry folks, totalitarian rule has been rained out. We'll let you know when the new date is. "
Click to expand...

And they probably claimed credit for forcing the postponement because they broke the news that the NWO had the plan up their sleeve.

So in that spirit I now claim that if aliens dont invade earth and enslave humanity in the morning then its because I just tipped you all of thats what they're planning to do.
 
well just remember that when you see an alien invasion attack just before the next elections, it's not really real. NWO is just trying to make you think we're under attack by aliens so they can enforce the police state. That's what John Lear said, and he's an expert pilot, so it must be true. This TOO will detract from the 9/11 petition, so it's best to wait until after the fake alien invasion and elections before taking a vote on the issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom