Nuclear explosions bad for people

senorpogo

Master Poster
Joined
Mar 18, 2006
Messages
2,100
If you thought a nuclear attack on Long Beach would be good for the city, you're apparently wrong. Thanks to the hard work of the people at Rand Corporation, we now know the truth.

A nuclear explosion at the Port of Long Beach could kill 60,000 people immediately, expose 150,000 more to hazardous radiation and cause 10 times the economic loss of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, according to a new Rand Corp. study.

The study released Tuesday by the Santa Monica-based think tank was the latest to address concerns about the possible vulnerability of the nation's ports.

Can't we assume that a nuclear explosion in any city isn't going to be a good thing?
 
Well yeah but it's good to have numbers of how many people can be killed, where the fallout will go and such. Although I doubt the economic loss can be accurately calculated.
 
I just wonder how much Homeland Security money they got for proclaiming that useful bit of information?
 
I don't know, I can think of a couple of cities which could only be improved by a nuking.

Uhm, well, God nuked Sodom and Gomorrah, didn't he? Ok, he sort of...

And there's also those tales of a 10Ky or 4 Ky old nuclear war bewteen the Indu gods...
 
i thought this was re long island...and i was going to make the following point regarding how nuclear meltdowns might not be so bad....

On 26 April 1986, reactor number four at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant blew up. Forty-eight hours later the entire area was evacuated. Over the following months there were stories of mass graves and dire warnings of thousands of deaths from radiation exposure.


Horizon interviews radiation scientist Dr Mike Repacholi
Yet in a BBC Horizon report screened on Thursday, a number of scientists argue that 20 years after the accident there is no credible scientific evidence that any of these predictions are coming true.

The anniversary of the world's worst nuclear accident in April saw the publication of a number of reports that examined the potential death toll resulting from exposure to radiation from Chernobyl.

Environmental group Greenpeace said the figure would be near 100,000. Another, Torch (The Other Report on Chernobyl), predicted an extra 30,000-60,000 cancer deaths across Europe.

But according to figures from the Chernobyl Forum, an international organisation of scientific bodies including a number of UN agencies, deaths directly attributable to radiation from Chernobyl currently stand at 56 - less than the weekly death toll on Britain's roads.

"When people hear of radiation they think of the atomic bomb and they think of thousands of deaths, and they think the Chernobyl reactor accident was equivalent to the atomic bombing in Japan which is absolutely untrue," says Dr Mike Repacholi, a radiation scientist working at the World Health Organization (WHO).
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5173310.stm

...but then i read the report - oops....:D
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom