• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Norman Mineta Testimony

pdoherty76

Banned
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
571
Could a debunker please debunk Mineta's testimony for me please? Also explain why the 911 commission failed to mention it and gave a conflicting account of when deranged neocon sadist Cheney got to the bunker
 
Could a debunker please debunk Mineta's testimony for me please? Also explain why the 911 commission failed to mention it and gave a conflicting account of when deranged neocon sadist Cheney got to the bunker


The best debunker is Mineta himself. The conspiracy theorists never listen this far:

MR. HAMILTON: But there very clearly was an order to shoot commercial aircraft down.

MR. MINETA: Subsequently I found that out.

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2006/06/more-911-truth-movement-deceptions.html
 
Dragging this back up to stop another thread going off course, didn't Cheney only authorise shootdown at 10:18, having a conversation with Bush until 10:20?
 
AGAIN!!!!! How many times do we need to debunk the same crap? Over and Over again. Unbelievable!!!!!:mad:
 
Last edited:
AGAIN!!!!! How many times do we need to debunk the same crap? Over and Over again. Unbelievable!!!!!:mad:

Umm... it might help if you actually "debunk" something once in a while.
 
Last edited:
Umm... it might help if you actually "debunk" something once in a while.


As you could find out from several threads on this forum, if you were not prevented by your unwillingness to look, the 9/11 Commission determined that Norman Mineta's timeline was off by at least a half-hour. Christopher Kojm, former senior counsel for the commission, explained to me that Mineta's testimony was left out of the official report for a simple reason: although he tells the same stories as other witnesses, he has every event occurring much earlier than everyone else. As a fantasist, you must reject the consensus as inconvenient to the myths you promote. But, understand that the timeline was established not only by testimony but by the examination of phone logs.
I got myself booted off the LC forum when I pointed out that for the Mineta myth to be true, Dick Cheney's confession in front of several witnesses of his participation in a monstrous crime had to be ignored by every reporter and by every member of the commission. Obviously, Cheney communicated a shoot-down order. But, if he didn't, then we have the biggest story in the history of journalism. There is a reason why no news outlet thinks there is a story here.
 
Truther definition of "Debunking":

Jesus floats down from the heavens and says to them "Your allegations are false, theory debunked".

TAM;)
 
Truther definition of "Debunking":

Jesus floats down from the heavens and says to them "Your allegations are false, theory debunked".

TAM;)


No, that doesn't even work. Remember the joke about the two conspiracists who die and go to heaven? As they stand before God, one of them asks, "Lord, please tell us, who killed JFK?"

God looks at them sternly and says, "I want you to listen carefully. Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, shot John F. Kennedy from the sixth floor of the Book Depository. Got it?"

One of the conspiracists turns to the other and says, "This is even bigger than we thought." :D
 
No, that doesn't even work. Remember the joke about the two conspiracists who die and go to heaven? As they stand before God, one of them asks, "Lord, please tell us, who killed JFK?"

God looks at them sternly and says, "I want you to listen carefully. Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, shot John F. Kennedy from the sixth floor of the Book Depository. Got it?"

One of the conspiracists turns to the other and says, "This is even bigger than we thought." :D
lol

So The last pope before this one came to NY. He flew into Newark. Norman Minetta was his chaeffeur and showed up half an hour early. The pope get there and tells Norman he wants to drive. Norman shrugs his shoulders and gets in the back. The pope drives.

The pope races up the Jersey Turnpike. Speeds thru the Lincoln tunnel. Cuts off people on the West Side Highway. Cop pulls over the limo. Sees its the pope driving. Goes back to his patrol car and radios the Seargent.

"what do you do when you pull over someone very important?"

"Did you pull over the mayor?"

"More important"

"Did you pull over the Governor?"

"No, more important than that?"

"Who did you pull over?"

"I don't know but the pope is his driver"
 
Umm... it might help if you actually "debunk" something once in a while.

Umm... it might help if you actually "provided evidence" of something once in a while.

You know, just for us to debunk.
 
Let's not get distracted by side comments, and stay on the topic.

:)

I don't know, the Pope joke was funny.

As to the testimony, that simple fact of the matter is Norman got his times wrong, easy mistake to make, especially for a older gentleman who was trying to recall a very stressful day several months later. When you move his times his testimony fits perfectly with the rest. Occam's razor here Bofors. Either Norman got the time wrong, or EVERY other person was lying about the time, ALL the logs of the day were fabricated, and ALL of the phone conversations were faked. Which is the more likely do you think?
 
I don't know, the Pope joke was funny.

As to the testimony, that simple fact of the matter is Norman got his times wrong, easy mistake to make, especially for a older gentleman who was trying to recall a very stressful day several months later. When you move his times his testimony fits perfectly with the rest. Occam's razor here Bofors. Either Norman got the time wrong, or EVERY other person was lying about the time, ALL the logs of the day were fabricated, and ALL of the phone conversations were faked. Which is the more likely do you think?


How old is Norman Mineta? I mean, how old is he? I can tell you that Christopher Kojm, former senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission tap danced around this question. When a twoofer ambushed Mineta at a dinner recently, Mineta didn't have the slightest clue that he plays a major role in a raging internet controversy. If you asked him if he understood that his testimony states that Dick Cheney confessed to participating in a heinous, unprecedented crime, he'd tell you that you were nuts. I guess he can't be senile.
 
As you could find out from several threads on this forum, if you were not prevented by your unwillingness to look, the 9/11 Commission determined that Norman Mineta's timeline was off by at least a half-hour. Christopher Kojm, former senior counsel for the commission, explained to me that Mineta's testimony was left out of the official report for a simple reason: although he tells the same stories as other witnesses, he has every event occurring much earlier than everyone else. As a fantasist, you must reject the consensus as inconvenient to the myths you promote. But, understand that the timeline was established not only by testimony but by the examination of phone logs.
I got myself booted off the LC forum when I pointed out that for the Mineta myth to be true, Dick Cheney's confession in front of several witnesses of his participation in a monstrous crime had to be ignored by every reporter and by every member of the commission. Obviously, Cheney communicated a shoot-down order. But, if he didn't, then we have the biggest story in the history of journalism. There is a reason why no news outlet thinks there is a story here.

Yup.

There's a reason alright!

MM
 
Yup.

There's a reason alright!

MM

Yea. And as much as you would like it to support your fantasy, it does not.

The reason is because it doesn't make any sense! Only irrational people could possibly read anything else into it.
 
Last edited:
How old is Norman Mineta? I mean, how old is he? I can tell you that Christopher Kojm, former senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission tap danced around this question. When a twoofer ambushed Mineta at a dinner recently, Mineta didn't have the slightest clue that he plays a major role in a raging internet controversy. If you asked him if he understood that his testimony states that Dick Cheney confessed to participating in a heinous, unprecedented crime, he'd tell you that you were nuts. I guess he can't be senile.

On a spectacular day like 9/11 I don't think even a "senior moment' would explain such a time discrepancy.

It's hard I know to believe that Cheney might have been fibbing.

MM
 
Yea. And as much as you would like it to support your fantasy, it does not.

The reason is because it doesn't make any sense! Only irrational people could possibly read anything else into it.

Sorry to disappoint you twinstead but my only fantasy involves women and this subject certainly couldn't be farther from that subject.

C where are you?

MM
 

Back
Top Bottom