NIST Denies Access to WTC7 Data

[cmatrix]

Obviously NIST has nothing to hide:

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data

Their crackpot physics-violating theory based solely on a computer model cannot have its data publicly scrutinized as it "might jeopardize public safety". Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

 

[T.A.M.]

lol...

1. The truth movement has at most a couple of thousand American members...so where are you gonna get these millions you speak of.

2. Once again, you complain here continuously about the attacks and vitriol, yet you thrown in words and threats (to NIST, good honest men and women) like that above.

TAM

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

Violent political extremists are violent.

Should we report this gentleman to the RCMP, TAM?

 

[Justin39640]

Obviously NIST has nothing to hide:

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data

Their crackpot physics-violating theory based solely on a computer model cannot have its data publicly scrutinized as it "might jeopardize public safety". Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

Silent explosives and a fictitious version of an incendiary (neither of which break any windows) doesn't seem a tad crackpot to you?? At all???? Really??

 

[uke2se]

Is threats of violence allowed by the forum rules if the threatened isn't a forum member?

It's pretty darn sick either way.

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Is threats of violence allowed by the forum rules if the threatened isn't a forum member?

It's pretty darn sick either way.

Forum members aren't allowed to plot or encourage criminal activity on JREF.

 

[Justin39640]

Is threats of violence allowed by the forum rules if the threatened isn't a forum member?

It's pretty darn sick either way.

Eh I think he was just being dramatic. No one (including cmatrix) believes he's gonna charge the NIST armed like he was storming Frankenstein's Mansion.

 

[uke2se]

Eh I think he was just being dramatic. No one (including cmatrix) believes he's gonna charge the NIST armed like he was storming Frankenstein's Mansion.

I fully believe twoofers are capable of violence, given the history of the "movement". I wouldn't take lightly any threats offered by a twoofer.

 

[cmatrix]

lol...

1. The truth movement has at most a couple of thousand American members...so where are you gonna get these millions you speak of.

2. Once again, you complain here continuously about the attacks and vitriol, yet you thrown in words and threats (to NIST, good honest men and women) like that above.

TAM

Railroading a troublemaker (i.e. one who makes JREFers look really bad) off your forum on trumped up charges might benefit you in the short term but will make an extremely powerful story for me. I win either way.

 

[uke2se]

Railroading a troublemaker (i.e. one who makes JREFers look really bad) off your forum on trumped up charges might benefit you in the short term but will make an extremely powerful story for me. I win either way.

I sense a suicide by mod coming. It's amusing how he sees being banned as a victory and not as a sign that he should consider his way of posting.

 

[Disbelief]

Obviously NIST has nothing to hide:

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data

Their crackpot physics-violating theory based solely on a computer model cannot have its data publicly scrutinized as it "might jeopardize public safety". Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

Why not just file a lawsuit?

 

[beachnut]

Obviously NIST has nothing to hide:

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data

Their crackpot physics-violating theory based solely on a computer model cannot have its data publicly scrutinized as it "might jeopardize public safety". Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

Why has 911 truth failed for over 9 years? They have moronic ideas and can't do their own work. Why does 911 truth expose their ignorance by attacking NIST? Why not do their own work and publish it? They can't they have no evidence to prove their delusions of CD and other idiotic claims.

911blogger, the place to go to see dolts in action, making idiotic comments and getting excited about nonsense.

Why are you fooled by idiotic claims of 911 truth?

 

[The Big Dog]

Obviously NIST has nothing to hide:

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data

Their crackpot physics-violating theory based solely on a computer model cannot have its data publicly scrutinized as it "might jeopardize public safety". Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

Sounds like cmatrix does not know that your fearless Truther can file an action seeking judicial review.

Or you can post utterly ridiculous crap about millions of Americans with pitch forks.

 

[Thunder]

"Petitions are useless folks and endless street protesting can only go so far. Who cares given that millions were ignored a few short years ago? Legal actions, lawsuits and subpoenas are the way to go. When will the Truth Movement start playing hard ball? When the planet's dead? Please don't get lost in delusional thinking that anything else will work instead.

John"

 

[Thunder]

Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

threatening violence against public servants is a big no-no.

perhaps a little phone call to the FBI is in order.



....as if you could even put together 5,000 people.

 

[Justin39640]

Why not just file a lawsuit?

That would take money that would be better spent preaching "The Truth" in New Zealand, Jamaica (the island not Queens, NY), Hawaii(?), Japan, etc. lol

 

[DGM]

Obviously NIST has nothing to hide:

http://911blogger.com/news/2010-07-12/nist-denies-access-wtc-collapse-data

Their crackpot physics-violating theory based solely on a computer model cannot have its data publicly scrutinized as it "might jeopardize public safety". Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

When do you plan to show how they "violated the laws of physics"? Hint: "Because I said so" is not an argument.

PS: Do you ever plan to show you have the money (and someone will independently judge your "contest") so we can take you to the cleaners?

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

There is an old lawyers saying; "When the facts are on your side, pound the facts. When the law is on your side, pound the law. When neither the facts nor the law are on your side, pound the table!"

Cmatrix has neiother the facts, nor the law and apperantly he doesn't even have a table. But he does have a sharp object.

 

[excaza]

"Banned from JREF forums" is certainly a powerful addition to a resume.

 

[CHF]

Well millions of pitch fork wielding Americans could certainly jeopardize NIST's public safety.

One problem: there's only a few thousand relatively dedicated truthers in America and most of them aren't even willing to attend a protest if it's sunny outside.

So I'd say NIST is just fine.