New paper on Mineta

[Yurebiz]

Just dropping by!
I haven't seen this posted yet so here it goes:
The entry:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/5637

The direct link:

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth914/mineta.html

I've noticed that they didn't mention Mineta's testimony flaw in which he describes the WH being evacuated, when it wasn't. So I'll break the ice by saying they cherry-picked his testimony, like CTs always do . Any other thoughts on this? I haven't even read it yet, to be fair with you, heh.

 

[Gravy]

From the summary:

The orders that the young man was referring to when he asked if “the orders still stand” must have been orders to stand down and allow the aircraft to hit the Pentagon. This proves that 9/11 was an inside job.

Er, no.

The paper is just more mindless quote-mining and ignoring of evidence.

"Navel Intelligence," indeed!

 

[gumboot]

*Yawn*.

I'm so over Mineta.

-Gumboot

 

[Brainster]

Here's a bit of typical Denier BS:

After the FAA notifies the NMCC, the NMCC contacts NORAD and military fighter jets are scrambled from the nearest Air Force base with jets on alert. [12] Shoot down authorization is not required to scramble the plane to intercept. The fighter jets are supposed to track down the plane, conduct a visual inspection and be in the position to shoot it down if necessary.

The footnote 12 refers us to this document, (PDF File) "Aircraft Piracy (Hijacking) and Destruction of Derelict Airborne Objects".

Page A-1, paragraph 3 lays out the procedures:

3. Procedures

a. General. Military personel will provide the following types of support: intercept, surveillance, lift, equipment and communications. Military personnel may not participate in a search, seizure, arrest or similar activity. This restriction would include the apprehension of aircraft hijackers or use of military aircraft (fixed-wing or helicopter) or other vehicles as platforms for gunfire or the use of other weapons against suspected hijackers.

Interesting. It certainly sounds as if there was no procedure to shoot down at all.

 

[pomeroo]

Can't Reach You

Mark, Are any of your e-mail addresses functioning?

 

[The Doc]

Using the same amount of evidence the CT'ers use - I could "prove" that Cheney gave this young guy an order to get his lunch.