• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

New Gage Video on PBS Online

Sabrina

Wicked Lovely
Sabrina
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Messages
9,810
So apparently there's a new video available on PBS Online done by none other than our friend Richard Gage and sponsored by AE9/11 Truth which has become somewhat popular (at least in the way that online videos tend for for a brief period).

A daring new documentary that uses scientific analysis to challenge the official 9/11 story became the most popular film on PBS during the week of the 9/11 anniversary, which followed its record-breaking broadcast on Colorado Public Television (CPT12).
9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out made its broadcast TV premiere on CPT12 (formerly KBDI) last month as part of a fundraising drive, according to a recent Digital Journal report. The premiere broadcast, which is available to view for free online, became the #1 "most watched" and "most shared" video on PBS online on September 11, and held the top spot for over a week. (The documentary, produced by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, currently ranks as the #4 “most watched” video and the #1 “most shared” video.)
Click to expand...

I was first directed to this on my Facebook page; seems one of the pages I liked in regards to politics is now skirting the edge of conspiracy theories regarding that day (the founder of the page in question apparently thinks there are still questions revolving around the collapse of WTC7, for instance, and some of the comments on that post are from people spouting the usual "steel can't melt"; "there was explosive residue found"; "explosions were heard", etc.) I'm not willing to subject myself to the video in question, to be honest, but I thought I'd alert everyone here; in the comments of the post, I directed everyone to come here for research purposes, so we may have an influx of people (assuming they decide to join) with questions and inane theories. Hopefully they won't be too stupid; I did tell them to use the forum's search function for their research, but who knows if they'll actually listen to me.
 
Sabrina said:
So apparently there's a new video available on PBS Online done by none other than our friend Richard Gage and sponsored by AE9/11 Truth which has become somewhat popular (at least in the way that online videos tend for for a brief period).



I was first directed to this on my Facebook page; seems one of the pages I liked in regards to politics is now skirting the edge of conspiracy theories regarding that day (the founder of the page in question apparently thinks there are still questions revolving around the collapse of WTC7, for instance, and some of the comments on that post are from people spouting the usual "steel can't melt"; "there was explosive residue found"; "explosions were heard", etc.) I'm not willing to subject myself to the video in question, to be honest, but I thought I'd alert everyone here; in the comments of the post, I directed everyone to come here for research purposes, so we may have an influx of people (assuming they decide to join) with questions and inane theories. Hopefully they won't be too stupid; I did tell them to use the forum's search function for their research, but who knows if they'll actually listen to me.
Click to expand...

This is a good site for propaganda but a terrible site for true research --- unless you enjoy 'muddied waters'.

A site that permits lying is not useful for research.

MM
 
Sabrina said:
So apparently there's a new video available on PBS Online done by none other than our friend Richard Gage and sponsored by AE9/11 Truth which has become somewhat popular (at least in the way that online videos tend for for a brief period).
...
Click to expand...

It's the video which Gage has been showing for money in a 2-month "world-premier" tour in May through July, which drew mostly the already faithful (less than 5% of the audiences considered the common story to be the right one before going there).

The Colorado-affiliate of PBS apparantly has been woo-friendly in the past - much to the dismay of the PBS ombudsman.

The content of the video goes like this:

Gage goes first, makes one of his old claims: "first time in history", "symmetrical collapse", "straight into footprint", "at freefall speed", "molten steel", "steel shipped to China", "thermite found in the dust", and then he parades a dozend or so of his "engineers", including our Tony Szamboti as well as David Chandler, Steven Jones, Eric Lawyer, all repeating the same claim. This goes for like 5 to 8 minutes, "expert" after "expert" merely repeating the same fallacy. Then Gage presents his next fallacy.

Pretty boring and long-winded argument from authority, that's all.
 
I struggled enough to get through Blueprint for Truth without wanting to buy a ticket to the US and choke Gage, dunno if I'd even be able to watch the intro of his 'Experts speak out'. How the every day person falls for his fiction I'll never know. The first sentence of my sig is never truer than when dealing with CD WTC7 idiots...
 
If the 911 truth nuts donate more money to PBS, we can have more programming that is rational, entertaining. Maybe it is a way to fund the rational programming with dollars from the dumb. Gage has taken in over a million dollars, why not PBS.

Gage has a following of dummies who can't think rationally, and he makes over 300k a year. Do the dummies donate to PBS after their delusions are "verified" by watching nuts on 911?
 
I would also note the following about the Facebook page that first posted this on my feed; it would appear their kneejerk reaction to dissension of their viewpoint is to ban the person with the dissenting opinion. I am no longer able to respond to posts from the "We Survived Bush; You'll Survive Obama" Facebook page and have subsequently un-liked that page. I'd recommend if anyone here has them liked to unlike them immediately; it's fairly clear that, if their reaction to dissension is to ban than critical thinking is not exactly their forte.

I'll admit, I was a little bit short with some of my comments on their post, but given that I was dealing with people who swallowed whatever they were told without doing any research themselves, I would have thought I'd be forgiven a bit of anger at the way they were acting like sheep. Not so, apparently.
 
cjnewson88 said:
I struggled enough to get through Blueprint for Truth without wanting to buy a ticket to the US and choke Gage, dunno if I'd even be able to watch the intro of his 'Experts speak out'.
Click to expand...

I've never actually watched any of his movies but, I have been to his show. You'd be surprised, he's surprisingly likable when you meet him face to face. He's full of crap and playing to his audience but in a seemingly sincere way.

Sabrina said:
I'll admit, I was a little bit short with some of my comments on their post,
Click to expand...

No! Not you.........................................:duck:



:boxedin:
 
Isn't it strange how ae911truth is allowed by MAINSTREAM MEDIA to be aired on TV? The same mainstream media which is actively participating in the cover-up of the biggest hoax in history of mankind?

What does this tell us? Why are underground 9/11 truth theories, like nuclear destruction or CGI planes TABOO on mainstream TV?

It is possible that the conspiracy is vaster than we thought, involving the creation of a fake 9/11 "truth" group and getting it on TV right often enough to act sort of a pacifier to truth seekers who still have questions.
It certainly appears to me that ae911truth is a government sponsored disinfo agency, financed by Larry Silverstein's insurance money that was scammed on 9/11 through the violent destruction of 3 highrise buildings, not hit by planes.

Follow the money trail.
 
Last edited:
Starving for Truth said:
Isn't it strange how ae911truth is allowed by MAINSTREAM MEDIA to be aired on TV? The same mainstream media which is actively participating in the cover-up of the biggest hoax in history of mankind?

What does this tell us? Why are underground 9/11 truth theories, like nuclear destruction or CGI planes TABOO on mainstream TV?

It is possible that the conspiracy is vaster than we thought, involving the creation of a fake 9/11 "truth" group and getting it on TV right often enough to act sort of a pacifier to truth seekers who still have questions.
It certainly appears to me that ae911truth is a government sponsored disinfo agency, financed by Larry Silverstein's insurance money that was scammed on 9/11 through the violent destruction of 3 highrise buildings, not hit by planes.

Follow the money trail.
Click to expand...

I've always suspected as much. The many Truthers I have spoken with seem far too stupid to be real people. It's as if members of the JREF were being paid to pretend they were advocates for a 9/11 Truth. I can easily imagine that some of the Truthers who appear on the JREF are really paid government agents just acting really dumb.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom