• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Need Help with Iron Microsphere Quotes

Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
877
JREFers, I need to get a video soundbite of a prominent truther (I'm thinking Gage, Harrit, Jones) explicity saying that the iron-rich microspheres found in WTC dust (USGS, R.J. Lee) can only be formed by Thermite, as jet-fueled or office fires just ain't hot enough.

sphere.jpg


If you can post the URL and start time for your video candidates, I will be most grateful!

Thanks, Dave
 
Didn't he say it in the national geographic documentary as well, the one where they actually have a controlled demolition team rigging a building and he made his infamous "they don't even know how it works, we don't even know how it works" quote...going to search for it.

ETA: eh, he didn't mention the microsphere's in the portion where he's talking about super secret hi tech nano thermite so I guess it was somewhere else.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the Gage clip!!

It'd be great to have gaffes from all three (e.g. Harrit & Jones too), so keep 'em coming!

Tomorrow I have some time on the Scanning Electron Microscope here at NMT to take some images of iron microspheres created, not by ThermiteTM, but by

a BIC lighter!


:D
 
Thanks for the Gage clip!!

It'd be great to have gaffes from all three (e.g. Harrit & Jones too), so keep 'em coming!

Tomorrow I have some time on the Scanning Electron Microscope here at NMT to take some images of iron microspheres created, not by ThermiteTM, but by

a BIC lighter!


:D

Oh no you di'int!
 
Thanks for the Gage clip!!

It'd be great to have gaffes from all three (e.g. Harrit & Jones too), so keep 'em coming!

Tomorrow I have some time on the Scanning Electron Microscope here at NMT to take some images of iron microspheres created, not by ThermiteTM, but by

a BIC lighter!


:D

Dave, as long as you're at it, can you compare the Harritt chips to your sample of "nanothermarte" at the same magnification?
Thanks
 
Got Some Awesome Results!

Thanks for all the articles and suggestions! We did the experiment this morning, and it was a smashing success!

fe_scan.jpg


We got Iron, we got Micro, we got Spheres, and all that just with some steel wool and a BIC lighter.

Still hoping for a Harrit soundbite, if any know of one lurking out there.

Cheers, Dave
 
Thanks for all the articles and suggestions! We did the experiment this morning, and it was a smashing success!

[qimg]http://www.nmsr.org/fe_scan.jpg[/qimg]

We got Iron, we got Micro, we got Spheres, and all that just with some steel wool and a BIC lighter.

Still hoping for a Harrit soundbite, if any know of one lurking out there.

Cheers, Dave

Awesome! Congratulations.
 
Thanks for all the articles and suggestions! We did the experiment this morning, and it was a smashing success!

[qimg]http://www.nmsr.org/fe_scan.jpg[/qimg]

We got Iron, we got Micro, we got Spheres, and all that just with some steel wool and a BIC lighter.

Still hoping for a Harrit soundbite, if any know of one lurking out there.

Cheers, Dave
My railing shop is filled with these things. Creeps me out when I see them magnified like that.

:boxedin:
 
Still hoping for a Harrit soundbite, if any know of one lurking out there.

Cheers, Dave




It is in Danish, but I will make a transcript and translate it to English, just give me some time.

It starts at 4:16 and the headline reads:

Beviser på thermitter
Mikro-kugler af jern I støvet

Translated:

Evidence of thermite
Iron microspheres in the dust.


Then it goes on regarding the collection of the dust and at around 6:00 he explains how Steven Jones tested commercial thermite and compared the residue to the spheres found in the dust.

The essential is that he does not absolutely clearly say that it can ONLY be the result of thermite, but the audience is left with the very clear impression that it is in fact a result of thermite. The text on the other hand clearly says that it IS evidence of thermite.

The rest of his long lecture held august 23 2011 in Copenhagen is filled with manipulated “facts” and direct lies. He is holding these lectures several times each month in Denmark, and to my knowledge they are pretty similar in content.
 
Last edited:
In the thermite paper, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Volume 2

page 29 :

8. After igniting several red/gray chips in a DSC run to
700 °C, we found numerous iron-rich spheres and
spheroids in the residue, indicating that a very hightemperature
reaction had occurred, since the iron-rich
product clearly must have been molten to form these
shapes. In several spheres, elemental iron was verified
since the iron content significantly exceeded the
oxygen content. We conclude that a high-temperature
reduction-oxidation reaction has occurred in the
heated chips, namely, the thermite reaction.
 
Thanks for all the articles and suggestions! We did the experiment this morning, and it was a smashing success!

[qimg]http://www.nmsr.org/fe_scan.jpg[/qimg]

We got Iron, we got Micro, we got Spheres, and all that just with some steel wool and a BIC lighter.

Still hoping for a Harrit soundbite, if any know of one lurking out there.

Cheers, Dave

Well I guess that proves WTC was packed to the gills with steel wool.

Too funny.

MM
 
In the thermite paper, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, Volume 2

page 29 :

8. After igniting several red/gray chips in a DSC run to
700 °C, we found numerous iron-rich spheres and
spheroids in the residue, indicating that a very hightemperature
reaction had occurred, since the iron-rich
product clearly must have been molten to form these
shapes. In several spheres, elemental iron was verified
since the iron content significantly exceeded the
oxygen content. We conclude that a high-temperature
reduction-oxidation reaction has occurred in the
heated chips, namely, the thermite reaction.

Yes, we know that the incompetent fools who wrote that paper made a ridiculously vague series of statements and concluded something which their results directly contradicted. Did you have something of your own to add to this particular piece of idiocy, or are you simply spamming a piece of pseudoscience that we're all familiar with?

Dave
 

Back
Top Bottom