• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Myspace Porn Conspiracy

has TheFantasticMrS heard of browser caches?

He's probably right about deleted images being kept. Hardrive space is fairly cheap and there is always the posibility of a request for undelete. For example wikipedia has most of it's deleted stuff sitting around in a seperate database table.
 
I am all for busting open this secret Myspace cache.

Busting it wide open.
 
So the conspiracy is to collect a huge cache of porn? Why be so
circuitous? Am I to believe the people who run MySpace do not have access to the rest of the internet?

Next we'll be hearing that they are digging a well at the bottom of Lake Erie.
 
Last edited:
He's probably right about deleted images being kept. Hardrive space is fairly cheap and there is always the posibility of a request for undelete. For example wikipedia has most of it's deleted stuff sitting around in a seperate database table.
i wonder how good an idea that is, as some of the indecent pics may well be of minors
 
i wonder how good an idea that is, as some of the indecent pics may well be of minors

1)Not really because that kind of image tends to get hard deleted (oversighted to use the terms the software uses). Actualy they tend not to get uploaded at all because most people are not stupid enough to upload such images to an enviroment where people may contact the police.
2)The database is not meaningfuly searchable so unless you know the exact name of the image you are not going to find it even if you do have acess.

Well thats wikipedia in any case.

In the case of sites light myspace there are various defences availible and employees will have better things to do than go digging through the deleted image database without good reason.
 
Last edited:
Someday we'll crack open the secret stash of Sense-of-Humour, which is locked away behind this forum's facade.
 
1)Not really because that kind of image tends to get hard deleted (oversighted to use the terms the software uses). Actualy they tend not to get uploaded at all because most people are not stupid enough to upload such images to an enviroment where people may contact the police.
2)The database is not meaningfuly searchable so unless you know the exact name of the image you are not going to find it even if you do have acess.

Well thats wikipedia in any case.

In the case of sites light myspace there are various defences availible and employees will have better things to do than go digging through the deleted image database without good reason.

1.)Kids generally don't consider pictures of themselves to be child-porn.
2.)Millions of kids use MySpace.
3.)Millions of child-porn pictures!
4.)How could anyone possibly decide if the image is illegal or not? Most kids Myspace profiles list their age as 99.
5.)Once a picture is on the internet, it is there forever, there is no such thing as hard-delete because when a kid uploads a pic of themselves their 742 friends and their 550,564 friends of friends all make a copy.
6.)This is my serious face :alien004:
 
Someday we'll crack open the secret stash of Sense-of-Humour, which is locked away behind this forum's facade.

Do you think the link in the OP was a joke? I've been around long enough to know that no conspiracy is too crazy for this forum.

We are mirthful people. We also have lots of experience with loons.
 
Last edited:
It's a joke, come on, and quite a mildly amusing one too. I'm also sure that in 12 pages on that thread nobody has sunk to such glum depths as to be discussing the dangers of child-porn and the meaningfulness of their search index.

Read the thread, it's a heck of a lot funnier than ours :o
 
Dude give us a break. You've been around here long enough to see crazy people come and go. We have been beaten to death by Poe's law.

Besides, we have a whole subforum for humor.
 

Back
Top Bottom