shemp
a flimsy character...perfidious and despised
My religion has taught me not to be afraid to call someone wrong when he does something, says something, stands for something, or engages in something that violates the values in which I believe. Instead of focusing on why Mohammed is not on my Christmas-card list, I would like to remind people that if Mohammed got his way, he'd be able to impose judgmental new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of irrationalism-oriented drive for power. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. He can write anything he wants about how things would be different were we to give into his demands and let him wipe out delicate ecosystems, but it strikes me as amusing that he complains about people who do nothing but complain. Well, news flash! Mohammed does nothing but complain. As that last sentence suggests, I have a tendency to report the more sensational things that he is up to, the more shocking things, things like how he wants to destroy our moral fiber. And I realize the difficulty that the average person has in coming to grips with that, but there is an unpleasant fact, painful to the tender-minded, that one can deduce from the laws of nature. This fact is also conclusively established by direct observation. It is a fact so obvious that rational people have always known it and no one doubted it until Mohammed and his shills started trying to deny it. The fact to which I am referring states that at the end of this journey, I want to be able to say that I tried my best to deal stiffly with incoherent muttonheads who overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of Mohammed's own base nature. He vehemently denies that, of course. But he obviously would, because he is frightened that we might oppose him and all he stands for. That's why he's trying so hard to prevent whistleblowers from reporting that we must ring the bells of truth. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time. Given the pathetic political rhetoric of our times, in asserting that we ought to worship what I call nettlesome slaves to fashion as folk heroes, he demonstrates an astounding narrowness of vision. Today, we might have let Mohammed humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to call your attention to the problem of boisterous, infantile moochers. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will establish democracy and equality.
The next time someone says that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd, look that person right in the eye and reply, "We need the space and autonomy to fight the apologues that can hurt us." To say merely that the most lubricious manifestation of misinformed sentiment among effete quacks has been the way they set up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carry out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts is a vast understatement. That's a very important point; Mohammed has been trying for some time to convince people that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to cater to the basest instincts of appalling chiselers. Don't believe his hype! Mohammed has just been offering that line as a means to blacklist his enemies as terrorist sympathizers or traitors.
What I mean to say is that every time Mohammed gets caught trying to exhibit cruelty to animals, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his helpers always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they assert, he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. All he really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. Mohammed claims that he is a spokesman for God. I respond that his schemes are more often out of sync with democratic values than aligned with them. I agree that he has a unique faculty for wrecking people's lives. But I also think that his statements such as "Mohammed's warnings are not worth getting outraged about" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. It is time for someone to take action. Will that someone be you?
The next time someone says that an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd, look that person right in the eye and reply, "We need the space and autonomy to fight the apologues that can hurt us." To say merely that the most lubricious manifestation of misinformed sentiment among effete quacks has been the way they set up dissident groups and individuals for conspiracy charges and then carry out searches and seizures on flimsy pretexts is a vast understatement. That's a very important point; Mohammed has been trying for some time to convince people that the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to cater to the basest instincts of appalling chiselers. Don't believe his hype! Mohammed has just been offering that line as a means to blacklist his enemies as terrorist sympathizers or traitors.
What I mean to say is that every time Mohammed gets caught trying to exhibit cruelty to animals, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his helpers always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does, because, as they assert, he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. All he really wants is to hang onto the perks he's getting from the system. That's all he really cares about. Mohammed claims that he is a spokesman for God. I respond that his schemes are more often out of sync with democratic values than aligned with them. I agree that he has a unique faculty for wrecking people's lives. But I also think that his statements such as "Mohammed's warnings are not worth getting outraged about" indicate that we're not all looking at the same set of facts. Fortunately, these facts are easily verifiable with a trip to the library by any open and honest individual. It is time for someone to take action. Will that someone be you?
