• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

My editorial for the Dallas Morning News

UnrepentantSinner

A post by Alan Smithee
Joined
Aug 26, 2001
Messages
26,984
Location
Dallas, Texas
I just finished this, it's nearly 5:30am and I'm just going to cut and paste it here. I plan on tidying it up a bit before I submit it to the local paper. (The indents don't seem to work)
-----------------------------------------------------------


I recently had the pleasure of attending a conference of skeptics hosted by the James “The Amazing” Randi Educational Foundation in Florida. Mr. Randi is perhaps best known for his many exposes of Uri Geller on the Tonight Show or his $1,000,000 paranormal challenge. The conference, called “The Amazing Meeting,” had speakers who discussed many of the issues facing not just the skeptical movement, but American society in general.
The issues discussed, from homeopathy to Planet X, could adversely effect everything from the education of our children to the very lives of our loved ones. As a society we must strive to be more critical in our thinking with regard to claims made by others. From telemarketing scams that merely effect our checkbooks to fraudulent health claims that could kill us, this country needs a healthy dose of skepticism.

Military and Police
One of the speakers, LTC Hal Bidlack, USAF gave a presentation on The Need for Standards in The War On Terrorism. One standard of utmost importance for the military, police and we civilians is skepticism. Col. Bidlack pointed that out by sharing stories of police departments buying painters masks that the sellers claimed would protect from chemical and biological agents and applicants for half million dollar grants from the DoD to study chemical detectors that were little more than dressed up divining rods.
Doesn’t the purchasing process require rigorous testing you might ask? If we look to the case of the Quadro Tracker device, the answer is apparently no. In the mid-90s schools and police agencies spent from $1000-$8000 apiece for Quadro Trackers that supposedly would find guns, drugs or explosives just by pointing it at suspected areas. The device turned out to be about $2 worth of plastic, wires and lights.

Homeopathy, Herbals and Faith Healers
Snake oil and patent medicine salesmen are not relegated to creaky horse drawn carts on dusty streets of the old west. They can be found at health and nutrition stores, in advertisements and infomercials and on religious broadcasting. The use of this quackery as “medicine” can cure your wallet of excess dollars – if you’re lucky.
Homeopathy is basically the dilution of supposedly curative substances until the solution is in the range of 1 part per million or less. One main tenet of homeopathy is that the more a substance is diluted the more powerful it’s effects. When asked how a treatment so diluted that none of the original substance remains in solution works, homeopaths invoke ambiguous terms like “vibrations” or “chemical memory.” If you want discount homeopathy, try some tap water and the placebo effect, the efficacy is about the same.
If you watch TV or listen to the radio you are bound to have encountered ads for herbal treatments that supposedly do everything from help you lose weight to cause certain body parts to get bigger. While further testing may some day vindicate the claims of herbalists, the latest results are not good. A recent National Institutes of Health study showed that there was no difference between St. John’s Wort and a placebo, while news wires carried the findings that ephedra, while only 1 percent of herbals used, accounted for 64 percent of adverse reactions called into poison control centers. We all need to remember that just because something is “natural” it doesn’t mean it’s effective or safe.
After the most recent Dateline expose of Benny Hinn, I’m astounded that anyone even takes him seriously any more. I’m sure the families of those profiled who thought they were healed by him (all were dead within a few months) take Hinn and his claims of healing very seriously. Hinn of course isn’t the only high profile faith healer, but he is one with a well-documented body count of failures filling America’s cemeteries. There’s nothing wrong with going to a healing revival or praying for a miracle cure, but please, don’t stop the treatment protocols prescribed by your physician.

Planet X
End Of The World theories tend to be from a secular or a religious bent. Secular world ending scenarios include catastrophic environmental changes, nuclear war or impacts by astronomic bodies. One of the strangest of the latter is Planet X. Supposedly a neutron star is on it’s way to Earth in May 2003 to wreak carnage, flip the Earth on it’s axis and destroy 95% of human life.
At the Amazing Meeting and on his Bad Astronomer web site, Dr. Phillip Plait, PhD of Sonoma State University fully debunks the claims of the Planet X proponents in easily grasped layman’s terms. One might be tempted to ask if it’s so obvious that Planet X doesn’t exist and won’t be ending life as we know it shortly after Tax Day, then why make a big deal of it? Dr. Plait answered that question with the last slide of his PowerPoint presentation - in 1997, Marshall Applewhite convinced 38 others to commit suicide with him so they could catch a ride on a UFO following comet Hale-Bopp. The same thing could occur as the due date for Planet X nears.

There are many other issues I could go into like UFO abductions, Psychics and Spirit Mediums, Young Earth Creationism, and Satanic Ritual Abuse, but for the sake of space, I’ll leave them for the reader to investigate. That is my whole purpose for writing this piece. If you believe in any of the above topics, I hope you’ll at least use a critical eye in examining the claims made by advocates and practitioners. Please keep in mind that “You never know, it might be true,” is not evidence in support of these claims.
If you’ll allow me one bit of irony, I’ll summarize my request for scientific and rational investigation of the world around us with an ancient Roman platitude – Caveat Emptor.
 
Is this an editorial (submitted by the newspaper editorial board or by a columnist) or a letter to the editor? It could be a suitable length for the former, but could be a bit too long for the latter.

Also, as you mentioned, it needs a little clean-up, e.g. "effect our checkbooks" should be "affect our checkbooks" and "it’s effects" should be "its effects," etc.

In connection with the Tracker, the outrage stems not only from the huge overprice markup in raw parts but also from the fact that the damned thing was worthless as a tracker.

It's a pretty good start on a column, however, and is certainly on a subject that OUGHT to interest newspapers.
 
Good summary and editorial, US.

In addition to Brown's comments, I'd add that Planet X is supposed to be a brown dwarf, not a neutron star, that the transition to the Benny Hinn paragraph is a little abrupt, and that the language in your closing paragraph reads a little roughly, particularly the first and last sentences.

Pehaps you could use something like "There are many other subjects for skepticism like UFO abductions ...", and then tie things back to the conference, and the purposes of JREF.

I don't understand how Caveat Emptor is ironic, and I'd substitute "admonition" for the more disparaging "platitude".

I'm glad you're taking the time to do this, and I hope that you get published!

--James
 
Thanks for the comments guys.

Brown, are you sure about "effect" and "affect?"

I thought "effect" was something that occurs on something else, while "affect" was something a person adopts to change their personality or way of speaking. :confused:
 
UnrepentantSinner said:
Thanks for the comments guys.

Brown, are you sure about "effect" and "affect?"

I thought "effect" was something that occurs on something else, while "affect" was something a person adopts to change their personality or way of speaking. :confused:
I can confirm that the word you want here is "affect". Yes, it's confusing.

Dictionary.com has an good article on it here (it's #6 in their FAQ). You're using "effect" as a verb, which means "to bring about or create".

--James
 
Unrepentant, do you think that it might be too much to mention the website? Readers can then go and check it out.

I'll also mention that the transition into the Benny Hinn paragraph is abrupt. You may need a better way to tie it in to the previous paragraph.

I would advocate adding the website address of the Bad Astronomy website since you mention it.

G6
 
Since this is meant to be a reader submitted editorial for the paper, I assume they'll not want URLs, but I'll include them in my submission.

Will tweek it some more, check on a/effect and submit it in the next day or so. Might appear in next Sunday's edition. Will let you all know and thanks for your input. :)
 
After several attempts at a rewrite (I simply am terrrible at editing myself) I've decided not to submit my editoral as a freelancer.

Maybe I'll try for a letter to the editor when I have some downtime tonight.
 

Back
Top Bottom