more minetta nonsense

[defaultdotxbe]

http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=879

interestingly he demands thathe be debunked personally, rather than referred to previous debunkings of his evidence

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth912/minetadraft2.doc

 

[gumboot]

http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=879

interestingly he demands thathe be debunked personally, rather than referred to previous debunkings of his evidence

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth912/minetadraft2.doc

Your answer is right on the mark.

I was very interested when I discovered more about Clarke's timeline. It really discredits any claims he might have about the VP. For starters, he didn't arrive at the White House until AFTER UA175 hit WTC2. He advised a White House evacuation and the evacuation of the VP very quickly. He then went into the Situation Room, which is at the opposite end of the building to the POEC, and he stayed there all day.

-Gumboot

 

[Quad4_72]

What in the world is all of Minneta crap I keep hearing about? Can I assume it is just another irrelevant event that occured on 9/11 that has absolutely nothing to do with the attacks?

 

[beachnut]

http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=879

interestingly he demands thathe be debunked personally, rather than referred to previous debunkings of his evidence

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth912/minetadraft2.doc

I read his conclusions and find that this guy is a liar.

He takes such a shallow and narrow approach to how things operate. And since there was zero NORAD stand down (I was active duty military at the time, I flew a mission the next two days; the military was never grounded), he is just a liar.

What a nerd. I am afraid to read it again and study it more; it hurts too much to see idiots at work.

Sorry but this is what I would tell my own brother if his work sucked that much; and I expect the same in return.

The paper proves CT guys are nuts.

 

[beachnut]

http://screwloosechange.xbehome.com/index.php?showtopic=879

interestingly he demands thathe be debunked personally, rather than referred to previous debunkings of his evidence

http://www.members.shaw.ca/truth912/minetadraft2.doc

If this guy publishes his paper on prisonPlanet I will have further confirmation of it being lies. That being said; I am biased but I have formed an opinion about Cynthia McKinney. She had a hearing and had truthers at it. That and her arrogance leads me to believe she is a nut case truther.

In his paper above, he devotes the last pages to CMK and draws his conclusions. It seems like self debunking for me.

Cynthia McKinney, a Democrat, served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1993 to 2003, and returned in 2005, represented Georgia's fourth congressional district. She asked questions and demanded answers to concerns of fiscal anomalies by the Pentagon in 1999 and 2000 (not even including the $2.3 trillion from September 10th, 2001) and the war games on 9/11. Her questions were not adequately answered.http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=2180411#_edn1

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=2180411#_ednref1 Transcript of Representative Cynthia McKinney's Exchange with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Richard Myers, and Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Tina Jonas, March 11th, 2005 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/cgi-bin/MasterPFP.cgi?doc=http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/031505_mckinney_transcript.shtml
VIDEO: http://www.prisonplanet.com/video/McKinney2.rm

And what do you know prisonplanet ("and a bit with a dog")

 

[defaultdotxbe]

I read his conclusions and find that this guy is a liar.

He takes such a shallow and narrow approach to how things operate. And since there was zero NORAD stand down (I was active duty military at the time, I flew a mission the next two days; the military was never grounded), he is just a liar.

What a nerd. I am afraid to read it again and study it more; it hurts too much to see idiots at work.

Sorry but this is what I would tell my own brother if his work sucked that much; and I expect the same in return.

The paper proves CT guys are nuts.

yeah, i skimmed his paper, payed speaciasl attention to section on adrews afb and flight 93

Andrews Air Force Base, located only 10 miles from the Pentagon, was supposed to house two combat-ready squadrons of fighter jets mandated to protect the skies over Washington D.C.

of course he never bothers to find out what "combat ready" means, same old truther garbage

 

[gumboot]

of course he never bothers to find out what "combat ready" means, same old truther garbage

It's wrong anyway. The 121st wasn't given the task of protecting Washington DC airspace until AFTER 9/11.

-Gumboot