a_unique_person
Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
according to this, anyway.
http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html
Microsoft is funding SCO to attack Linux. It is not content to just take on Linux in the market place, it has to resort to underhand tactics. A virtual monopoly is not enough. It is to control everything.
Take note, Shanek.
http://www.opensource.org/halloween/halloween10.html
Halloween X: Follow The Money
3 Mar 2004
Excuse me, did we say in Halloween IX that Microsoft's under-the-table payoff to SCO for attacking Linux was just eleven million dollars? Turns out we were off by an order of magnitude — it was much, much more than that.
The document below was emailed to me by an anonymous whistleblower inside SCO. He tells me the typos and syntax bobbles were in the original. I could not, when I received it, certify its authenticity, but I presumed that IBM's, Red Hat's, Novell's, AutoZone's, and Daimler-Chryler's lawyers could subpoena the original. On March 4th SCO, within 24 hours of publication, I received word from Steven J. Vaughan at eWEEK.com that SCO had confirmed that the memo is legitimate.
Explanatory comments are interspersed in brown serif font (I changed this from green because of complaints from the colorblind). Particularly noteworthy bits of the original are in red.
Microsoft is funding SCO to attack Linux. It is not content to just take on Linux in the market place, it has to resort to underhand tactics. A virtual monopoly is not enough. It is to control everything.
Take note, Shanek.