• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Michael Moore on Question Time tonight (BBC1)

richardm

Philosopher
Joined
Aug 6, 2001
Messages
9,248
Michael Moore is going to be on the programme on Thursday the 28th (tonight, at time of typing). He's appearing with the man who coined the "Axis of Evil" phrase, David Frum, and the man for who the phrase "corpulent, jowl-faced, baggy-eyed, racist, pompous, cowardly, (censored)-novel writing twat" was coined, Richard Littlejohn

Should be quite entertaining.
 
richardm said:
Michael Moore is going to be on the programme on Thursday the 28th (tonight, at time of typing). He's appearing with the man who coined the "Axis of Evil" phrase, David Frum, and the man for who the phrase "corpulent, jowl-faced, baggy-eyed, racist, pompous, cowardly, (censored)-novel writing twat" was coined, Richard Littlejohn

Should be quite entertaining.
That would be awesome to watch. Bet it will be a laugh. Speaking of laughs I saw "Team America World Police" and aside from being frikkin hilarious their Michael Moore character was priceless.
 
So it's following the US media model of having polemicists on, rather than people who may inform and debate?

Dah! Although if they'd had Chris Morris or Mark Thomas on as well...
 
It would have been a far easier prog to watch had half the audience not "whooped and booed" at just about every little perceived pit of partisanship. Mind you it would have been easier to watch if the audience had not done the same when the non-partisan speaker(s) merely stated facts rather than opinion.

Facts will be facts even if you don't like them. Jeer all you like, they won't change.
 
I absolutely love watching QT, but I thought that this show was a let down. The audience was appalling, making a noise about every little thing, rather than enjoying a lively and informed debate. In fact the audience may have been better suited to a Jerry Springer type show. I also felt that the panel was weak. Both of the politicians tried to ignore the questions and to let forth with electioneering statements whenever they could. Moore was good value for money, but I feel that I must apologise to the Americans for them seeing Littlejohn. He is an English 'journalist' who specialises in rent a rant pieces full of kneejerk reactions to populist issues. So, sorry about him folks.:o

Jim Bowen
 
Got to concur; the thing was a bit of a letdown. Pity. I actually gave up on it after a while; the pantomime atmosphere didn't really hold my interest.
 
The BBC site says the panelists "passionately argued their views from all sides of the debate" - you could have fooled me - they were a decidedly listless bunch.

Michael Moore was hopeless (hamstrung now by his support for Kerry I suspect), and found it difficult to get his points across without being shouted down by the audience, many of whom did not want to hear anything that challenged what they have been fed by Fox TV.
His sycophantic comments about the British knowing their history - yeah right! The one that brought/brings civilisation to the rest of the world!

Littlejohn was the usual little US arse-licking creep he always was. I don't know if it was him or Frum that used the old lie that weapons inspectors were kicked out in 1998.
With his "Sunsational" allegations and cheap jibes against the French and the Germans he was playing right into the hands of ignorant Americans.

The Neocon/Republican and BBC favoirite David Frum (ex-speechwriter for GWB... that "axis of evil" goon) was his usual cardboard cutout self and showed he was a stranger to the truth as he always does.

Lida Roderiguez-Taseff, a Civil Liberties Lawyer I believe meandered all over the place although she was the only one with anything useful to say. She was booed.
She said there won't be enough machines on the day in Florida.

It was the usual "probably", "could've been" and "maybe" arguments by the pro-war brigade.
Saddam "could have" had WMD.
Saddam "may have" had links to Al Qaeda.
Saddam "might have" reconstituted his weapons programme.
Saddam`s aunt "might have" had nuts so she "might have" been his uncle.
The fact that overwhelming evidence proves the total opposite to these claims was neither here nor there.

Dimbleby could not control the "mob" in the studio - and coughed most of the time.

A few members of the audience made effective points against the war; but there were rather too many Republican Robots present for them to have an impact - BBC "balance" again! The sound in the studio was badly managed, so many of the questions and comments from the audience were difficult to hear....

Apart from that it was crap!

As for that Israeli-American harridan at the beginning - the time allowed for her to spout all that venomous bile about Arabs as a prelude was unbelievable. How disgusting it was that she was allowed to go totally unchallenged. She needs to spend a couple of days in Palestine to find out just what fine, upstanding gentlemen inhabit the Israeli army.
I have a feeling she might change her tune pretty damn quick.

You can see the video from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/3954967.stm#
 

Back
Top Bottom