• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mercenaries Third Largest Force in Iraq

a_unique_person

Director of Hatcheries and Conditioning
Joined
Jul 19, 2002
Messages
49,629
Location
Waiting for the pod bay door to open.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/04/01/1080544627082.html

Mercenaries are a sign of the times, I think. When you can't get people to do your fighting because you have the backing to do it, and you have to resort to paying people to do it for you, you are one more step removed from legitimacy and stability.

Private security operators now make up the third largest armed force in Iraq, Paul McGeough writes from Baghdad.

When the doors open at Level 5 of the Palestine Hotel, there's a spit-and-polished Gurkha pointing a high-powered gun into the lift.

The whole floor and another above it have been taken by Kellogg Brown & Root, the construction wing of Halliburton, one of the biggest US firms working in Iraq. And though the linguists of occupation don't allow the word "mercenary", the Gurkha is part of a 15,000-strong private security operation that is the third biggest armed force in Iraq.

Their numbers - and salaries as high as $US1000 ($A1300) a day - attest to the danger of this Arab version of Dodge City.

But when they signed up, few would have anticipated the terrible butchery of four colleagues whose bodies were dismembered and dragged through the streets of the western city of Fallujah on Wednesday.

Television footage of the scene - heavily edited before going to air worldwide - showed their corpses being kicked and stoned before being broken up with blows from steel rods.

At least two of them were strung up on a bridge and parts of the other bodies were stuck on poles and paraded around town.

The barbarity at Fallujah provoked outrage in Washington and elsewhere - but did little to change US rhetoric on the pacification of post-war Iraq.

The ranks of the private armies in Iraq are growing so rapidly that US and British defence officials are at a loss to know how to counter offers to the best of their Special Operations and SAS staff.

In the mayhem, Baghdad has been carved into a series of Western security bubbles. There is the Green Zone, American proconsul Paul Bremer's sprawling bunker for which the Pentagon is about to let a $100 million privatised security contract; foreign embassies are grouping and fortifying; and western business and the foreign media have all but withdrawn behind concrete, wire and guns.

Pity the poor Iraqis. They're outside the walls and at the other end of the guns, unprotected from bombers and criminals who have run amok, robbing and kidnapping in a security vacuum in which it is nigh on impossible for a naive new Iraqi police force to control.

And it's not just the foreigners - South Africans, who know they are breaking their country's laws on mercenary activity; skilled Gurkhas and Fijians who can't resist the dollars; or the Chileans who trained under General Pinochet - who are involved.

Beneath all of that is a dubious layer of Iraqi-run security - hundreds of local firms that have the capacity to become clan-based militias if, as some expect, security worsens after the June 30 hand-back of sovereignty to an Iraqi administration.

This is what happens: An Iraqi working with a new foreign media or business sees the opening, recruits 30 or 50 family and friends to whom he gives guns and the ubiquitous baseball cap and then he bids for the security contract.
 
Yeah, they were thugs for hire. They knew the risks and they were willing to take them. $1,000 a day will bring out a lot of their kind, people willing to kill for money.

I have no sympathy for them. They were there to clear the way for American profittering. They would have shot anyone in that crowd, no questions asked, if their employer ordered them to do it.

At least when real soldiers die, they die for their country and their people, and maybe for democracy, though not in this war. These guys died for a bunch of war profiteers. You won't see their names mentioned in their employer's next annual report. Blackwater USA won't build a memorial to them.

But they knew the risks. They were willing to roll the dice. This time, the dice came up snake-eyes for them.
 
And as I pointed out in the other thread, how bizarre is it when the US administrator Bremer is protected by private security (mercenaries, whatever you want to call them)rather than official US forces?

Not only does that send a strange message to the other side about our country's ability to do anything, and the legitimacy of the mission, to our own troops, and whether we think they're good enough, but never mind the whole rip off buddy contractor problems. It really can't get any more weird.

Cheney's fetish for privatizing governmental functions under the guise of free enterprise. There is a huge downside.
 
a_unique_person said:


I would put a LOL here if it wasn't so tragically true.

Yeah, they don't even get the horribly inadequate "Thanks for your service, here's a flag for your coffin" that official sacrificial lambs/victims do.
 
I'll bet the mercenaries get better pay and benefits than real service men/women do (otherwise why would they do it?), and yet the cost still goes to the taxpayers anyway, so what is "privatizing" saving us monetarily?
 
I knew that one brain cell I have left would come in handy one day:

Let's Go

Don't wanna study on the GI bill
Want more action haven't had my fill
Mercenary, fight for anyone
Fight for money
Fight for fun

Let's go

Got a country you wanna protect
But your army is likely to defect
Hire my SMG with full clip
On automatic it's a guaranteed hit

Let's go

Gee its kinda scary out here
Mosquitoes are happy tonight
Mommy, Daddy can I please come home
Even if just for one night

Let's go

Shocked how deadly we fight back
Troublemakers who attack
Mercenary fight for anyone
Fight for money, fight for fun.

Let's go

(The Ramones "End of the Century" 1980)
 
Dang it! All we have here is bleeding heart liberals on this thread so far. When are some real Americans going to step up to the plate?
 
Tricky said:
Dang it! All we have here is bleeding heart liberals on this thread so far. When are some real Americans going to step up to the plate?
They're thinking, thinking, thinking. Ouch, that hurts.
In the meantime let's see if we can anticipate what it will be.

My first contribution:
"Oh you Bush haters how could you defile the dead..."

You're next....
 
Can you imagine how disruptively confusing, and infuriating it must be for an occupied country (even those in favor of the occupation, or "liberation") to see heavily armed non-uniformed "authorized" (? how would you know?) people even wandering around much less enforcing their will. Doesn't lessen the sense of chaos.
I'm getting a better understanding of the rules of war and why uniforms of a real country are an important thing.
 
Somehow I can't see “rent a cops” and mercenaries being the same thing.
 
So when some celeb travels with his bodyguards he's traveling with mercenaries because he isn't trying to get cops to protect him 24/7? These guys aren't running around conducting searches for the bombers and others, nor are they in the street actively fighting. They just protect their clients interests, if that is a mercenary in your view, you need to get your vision checked.

To paraphrase the wise Comic Book Guy "Worst thread ever"
 
"Liberalism is a Mental Disease
M Savage"

Does that make you feel more comfortable in your belief system. To try to define people's belief systems so that you can automatically dismiss them without thinking? Labels sure are easy.

Do you understand that your perceived adversaries are not adopting those hateful moronic tactics?
There are good, reasonable, patriotic, intelligent conservatives. How's that?
Can you feel the love? We'll move this debate to another thread that you will start, OK?
 
Outcast said:
Somehow I can't see “rent a cops” and mercenaries being the same thing.
I believe that you can't. So you won't be "contributing" to this thread anymore, right?
 
subgenius said:
"Liberalism is a Mental Disease
M Savage"

Does that make you feel more comfortable in your belief system. To try to define people's belief systems so that you can automatically dismiss them without thinking? Labels sure are easy.

Do you understand that your perceived adversaries are not adopting those hateful moronic tactics?
There are good, reasonable, patriotic, intelligent conservatives. How's that?
Can you feel the love? We'll move this debate to another thread that you will start, OK?

Who the hell are you talking to? The only moronic tactic being used at the moment is by you with the ramblings.

They are no more a group of mercanaries than are anyone's bodyguards. They are paid to protect the client and the client's interests. Calling them mercenaries shows a lack of understanding of the english language at best.
 
Somehow I think this is going to be necessary.

Main Entry: se·cu·ri·ty
Pronunciation: si-'kyur-&-tE
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
1 : the quality or state of being secure : as a : freedom from danger : SAFETY b : freedom from fear or anxiety c : freedom from the prospect of being laid off <job security>
2 a : something given, deposited, or pledged to make certain the fulfillment of an obligation b : SURETY
3 : an evidence of debt or of ownership (as a stock certificate or bond)
4 a : something that secures : PROTECTION b (1) : measures taken to guard against espionage or sabotage, crime, attack, or escape (2) : an organization or department whose task is security

Main Entry: 1mer·ce·nary
Pronunciation: 'm&r-s&n-"er-E
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -nar·ies
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin mercenarius, irregular from merced-, merces wages -- more at MERCY
: one that serves merely for wages; especially : a soldier hired into foreign service

Now if you really can't see the difference, the issue is yours.
 

Back
Top Bottom