• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Martial Arts

Ashi

Student
A
Joined
Sep 26, 2003
Messages
40
The following quote is taken from Mr. Randi's latest commentary:

"...it would be quite a surprise for me to find any martial arts group that does not use supernatural claims and old tricks to sell its philosophy"

I understand that Mr. Randi is probably familiar with and therefore speaking of silly groups like yellowbamboo(zle) and the like, however, he is definitely painting with too broad a brush with this comment.

I have been an active competitive martial artist for over 25 years and I have practiced with dozens of different groups. I cannot think of one martial arts group that actually participates in competitive fighting activities that uses any kind of bunk to promote their fighting styles or philosophies. Actual fighting may be the defining factor that differentiates the groups Mr. Randi is speaking of and the ones that I am attempting to bring to his attention. A great many martial arts groups study physical combat from a scientific standpoint and therefore do not make any kind of supernatural claim. Even in arts like Muy Thai (that have traditional spiritual dances) and professional western boxing (in which it seems like every win is attributed to some deity) there are very few people who make any blatant supernatural claims because these claims will obviously be tested in the ring.

Just a few examples of the groups that I am referring to are as follows: SCA stick fighters, boxers, traditional kick-boxers, living history sword fighters and most teams and training groups that compete in IFC/HFC/UFC/Pride/K-1/Vale Tudo/Shidokan/Pankration style fighting.
 
Ashi said:
The following quote is taken from Mr. Randi's latest commentary:

"...it would be quite a surprise for me to find any martial arts group that does not use supernatural claims and old tricks to sell its philosophy"

I understand that Mr. Randi is probably familiar with and therefore speaking of silly groups like yellowbamboo(zle) and the like, however, he is definitely painting with too broad a brush with this comment.
Click to expand...

This is another great example of Randi engaging his mouth without bothing to know what he's talking about. "Too broad a brush" as you say. Some people call it a straw man.

Like Ashi, I've been a martial artist for some time now training under people with credentials up to and including grand masters of their art. I have never been shown anything that's magic, or supernatural, or whatever.
 
Re: Re: Martial Arts

Trueblood said:

Like Ashi, I've been a martial artist for some time now training under people with credentials up to and including grand masters of their art. I have never been shown anything that's magic, or supernatural, or whatever.
Click to expand...

Have you ever been shown something by one of the masters that, to the untrained, would appear to be magical or supernatural?

Sir Arthur C. Clarke's third law comes into play here:

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

Randi should know this law quite well as much of his own profession (magic) makes good use of it. He should also understand the notion of "magicians never reveal their secrets" except to properly indoctrinated students of magic. He should, therefore, understand the possibility that martials arts masters may occasionally demonstrate techniques and cloak the explanation in terms that, to the uninitiated, appears magical (for instance, ki force or animal styles).
 
DSM-

I for one have seen many examples of what you are describing. "The Unbendable Arm Technique" is one example that can work exactly as you expressed in your post. This type of bunk is common in some parts of the martial arts world (non-competitive arts for example) yet it is almost non-existent in others (competitive arts).

The point of my original post was just because a number of people who perform martial arts feats claim that there really is something supernatural at work, it does not follow that all martial artists claim supernatural powers.

Or, to put it another way:

The point of my original post was just because a number of people who perform magic illusions claim that there really is something supernatural at work, it does not follow that all magicians claim supernatural powers.

Could I reasonably say? "...it would be quite a surprise for me to find any magicians group that does not use supernatural claims and old tricks to sell its philosophy"
 
I should've said at the end of my last post that this doesn't necessarily mean that a martial artist is deceiving an uninitiated into a false belief, but rather that, through his manner and approach, he is merely setting up the person for a better understanding of what is to come. There is nothing wrong with this so long as the person is not lulled into a false belief that he too could perform this "miracle" with only a minimum of training.

p.s. I am not a martial artist -- I'm merely speculating on the above.
 
I'm a martial artist and a skeptic. I can't stand it when people try to tell me that "chi energy" is a real thing. The tricks that are done seem to lose their powers in the ring, or real fight. Chi masters should be forced to fight in the UFC. I'd love to see a MMA fighter ground the floor with a master of "Dim Mak".
 
thaiboxerken said:
I'm a martial artist and a skeptic. I can't stand it when people try to tell me that "chi energy" is a real thing. The tricks that are done seem to lose their powers in the ring, or real fight. Chi masters should be forced to fight in the UFC. I'd love to see a MMA fighter ground the floor with a master of "Dim Mak".
Click to expand...

This is not true Mr. arrogant ****tard! Nobody has ever told TB****suckingK about chi. You’re a ****ing dumb liar if you want us to get irrational accept your BS anecdotal claims.
 
You can add the Inayan System of Escrima to that list. I have had several discussions with the current head of the system, Jason Inay. He too seems to regard the technical aspects of the system as a science. In fact, one of the things I have heard him say many times, is that the system is based on what has been demonstrated to work in actual combat. He also often uses the term "empirical knowledge" when referring to the application of the art. The point being that the forms, drills, techniques, patterns, etc, are all teaching tools, designed to develop skills and attributes. What actually makes it into an individual practitioner's personal fighting style, is that they have managed to make work in actual full-speed sparring. Anything else is just going to get you injured or killed.

I actually mentioned the Yellow Bamboo nonsense to him a few days ago. I got the distinct impression that he would have absolutely no compunctions about showing them what martial arts is really all about.


Dr. Stupid
 
Martial arts (karate) for eight years - no magic involved or invoked anywhere in our school, just concentration, hard graft and constant practice that gets harder the higher up the ladder I try to go. I have had the bruises and blood to mark my way...

Ki?? Ha!!! :roll:
 
I'm with Zep here, after years of training in karate and judo, not one mention of Qi/Chi. Endless hours of physically punishing kata, interspersed with humiliating and painful defeat by the experts was the way of it.

There's nothing paranormal about the abilities of martial arts masters, just years of experience and dedication.
 
Last time Randi covered this topic he said almost the same thing. Perhaps someone should tap him on the shouder. It might save him some embarrassment one day in a less friendly crowd.
 
LTC8K6 said:
Well, Randi did say "martial arts group". Meaning cultlike martial arts groups such as YB, I think.
Click to expand...
That's a generous interpretation LTC8K6
 
Kimpatsu said:
The founder of Shorinji Kempo eschewed any magical claims, and was a religious agnostic.
Click to expand...

Yes but isn't it classified as a religion in Japan? As I recall it's a non-theistic "gradualist" (rinzai??) form of Buddhism? Trained for a few years under sensei's Bene Wang of Malaysia and others at Glasgow Uni.
I've been training in tai chi chuan for the past 15 years under a former full contact champion of south east asia. He points out that the older books (the Classics) talk about Jing (ummm trained power??) and not etheric chi. My experience is that the more mystic the approach the less they have to offer.
 
I agree partly with Randi's statement whether he meant the cults or martial arts in general, since he said "and old tricks".

Old tricks seem to be fairly common in the martial arts demos I have seen.
 
I guess, if you are very liberal about the meaning of "old tricks", you are correct. A punch to the face is an "old trick". The only martial art demos I've done never involved trickery or deception. No board breaking nonsense or breaking other inanimate objects are ever involved in my schools. I guess the only real flashiness is when sparks fly off of our swords, but that's due to metal on metal contact. It's really cool if it's dark.
 
Wudang said:
Yes but isn't it classified as a religion in Japan? As I recall it's a non-theistic "gradualist" (rinzai??) form of Buddhism?
Click to expand...
In Japan, "religion" (shukyo) is more akin to the English word "ethics". It has no theistic aspects, which is true of normal Northern Zen.
 
thaiboxerken said:
I guess, if you are very liberal about the meaning of "old tricks", you are correct. A punch to the face is an "old trick". The only martial art demos I've done never involved trickery or deception. No board breaking nonsense or breaking other inanimate objects are ever involved in my schools. I guess the only real flashiness is when sparks fly off of our swords, but that's due to metal on metal contact. It's really cool if it's dark.
Click to expand...

Seems to me that the "nonsense" of breaking boards is a more effective demonstration of power than "sword dancing".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom