Marshall Brain, dingleberry.

Marshall Brain said:
Isn't it fascinating that there can be two credible explanations for such a complex event, and that both explanations can be so diametrically opposed to one another?
Click to expand...

:boggled: Oh, it's so confusing -- two credible explanations. Guess I might as well flip a coin.
 
I was all prepared for a reasonable article about the psychology of CTs, and it ends up being a "let's polish this turd" treatise complete with Silverstein BS.
 
The HowStuffWorks site has always irritated me because Brain would take such a neutral position on everything, even things that don't deserve neutrality. Examples are Intelligent Design and Astrology.

But this article is over-the-top in its cheerleading for the CT angle. It's surprising that the CTers don't advertise it more.
 
greyleonard said:
Knowing the high level of truthiness in The 9/11 Truth Movement, I guess I shouldn't have been surprised to find the dysfunctional article sitting at howstuffworks.com written by the founder, Marshall Brain.:

http://people.howstuffworks.com/conspiracy-theory.htm
Click to expand...

We could spend a great deal of time arguing one side or the other. Instead, we'll focus on the process. Isn't it fascinating that there can be two credible explanations for such a complex event, and that both explanations can be so diametrically opposed to one another?
Click to expand...

Where is the other "credible explanation"? Facts would help.

The beam weapon?
Thermite?

Facts; cut pilot throat, fly plane into building, (this is too simple)

9/11 was too simple to figure out until flight 93 passengers had the facts!
 
OMFG. I couldn't get past the first page of this tripe. Actually, I couldn't get much past the paragraph so many of you are posting:

We could spend a great deal of time arguing one side or the other.
Click to expand...

But that wouldn't be exciting since the official version has the backing of every single fact, while the other side has no real theory other than "nuh-unh!" and no facts backing their myriad stories.

Instead, we'll focus on the process. Isn't it fascinating that there can be two credible explanations for such a complex event, and that both explanations can be so diametrically opposed to one another?
Click to expand...

Isn't it fascinating that there aren't two credible explanations in this case? That there's one credible explanation and then some incoherent babbling?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom