• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

JDX - Watch the Nutter Crack

DavidJames

Penultimate Amazing
D
Joined
Sep 17, 2001
Messages
10,493
Location
Front Range, CO
In the "Flyover Witnesses, Courtesy of Killtown" thread on the Pentagon forum.

He provides quotes (selective, ya think?) about people seeing a second plane. After the quotes he states this.

JDX said:
Certainly appears to be a bombing run.
Click to expand...

Nice, except none of his quotes support that. In fact one flat out says (bolding mine:
''The plane came in at an incredibly steep angle with incredibly high speed,''... was driving by the Pentagon at the time of the crash about 9:40 a.m. The impact created a huge yellow and orange fireball, he added. Renzi, who was interviewed at the scene by FBI agents, said he stopped his car to watch and saw another plane following and turn off after the first craft's impact.
Click to expand...

Another quote (bolding mine)
said some sort of plane followed the doomed American Airlines jet toward the Pentagon, then veered away after the explosion.
Click to expand...

JDX then goes on to tell us about bombing runs and shows a picture of a MOAB and a plane dropping a bomb (missile, I'm not an expert). Of course, JDX, never actually having a solid sack proclaims "All pure speculation of course.. "
 
You left out the best part! (bolding mine)

JDX@LC said:
This is a video game, but the HUD and sim effects are pretty accurate..Depending on the type of guided weapon, its very possible the attack on the pentagon was some type of bombing run with some type of MOAB.
Click to expand...

Looks like video games are his only verifiable experience.
 
The strange Mr. Doe seems to be forgetting about the plane crew that was asked to follow flight 77:
Reagan National controllers then vectored an unarmed National Guard C130H cargo aircraft, which had just taken off en route to Minnesota, to identify and follow the suspicious aircraft. The C-130H pilot spotted it, identified it as a Boeing 757, attempted to follow its path, and at 9:38, seconds after impact, reported to the control tower: "looks like that aircraft crashed into the Pentagon sir." –The 9/11 Commission report
Click to expand...
Video of the pilot discussing seeing flight 77 and the aftermath of flight 93:
http://tinyurl.com/l98un

ETA: A MOAB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He's officially beyond hope.
 
This video game stuff is seriously out of control.

I'm thinking of making my own conspiracy theory video. Here's an excerpt:

Screenshot: http://www.mobygames.com/images/shots/original/1041466875-00.gif
As you can plainly see here, in this rigorious computer simulation of the world trade centers, it takes 19 gorilla smashes to crash a building the size of WTC1. Based upon my unrefutable monkey-strength extrapolations in section III, it's obvious that this amount of force would be equal to 3.18912 767 crashes. There is no way a single 767 could have done the damage of 19 gorilla smashes. It's impossible.

The government continues to ignore this smoking gun.
Click to expand...
 
DavidJames said:
JDX then goes on to tell us about bombing runs and shows a picture of a MOAB and a plane dropping a bomb (missile, I'm not an expert). Of course, JDX, never actually having a solid sack proclaims "All pure speculation of course.. "
Click to expand...

Emphasis mine, A MOAB is a guided bomb, the only things we have that are more powerful are Nukes, and if one penetrated the wall of the Pentagon then blew I'm not sure how much of the Pentagon ould be left.

Here's a vid of a test.http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/moab.htm
 
CurtC said:
"MobyGames
The definitive resource for PC games
mobygames.com"

Was there supposed to be more there?
Click to expand...

If you would just OPEN YOUR EYES and stop believing everything the government told you.. and maybe just DO SOME RESEARCH you'd see.. it's obvious!!!!!!!!

http://www.consoleclassix.com/info_img/Rampage_NES_ScreenShot3.jpg
http://www.consoleclassix.com/info_img/Rampage_NES_ScreenShot2.jpg
http://www.cpcgamereviews.com/r/rampage.png
http://nitros9.lcurtisboyle.com/originals/rampage.gif

This rigorous computer simulation has been done by experts on at least 5 continents!!!
 
JDX has convinced himself of the conspiracy...why? Why you ask? Because now he finally belongs...AND...he is a big fish in a little pond. he is (sound the trumpets) AN EXPERT amongst a pile of AMATEURS.

You will never convince him otherwise, so long as he feels he is "a part of something".

TAM
 
CurtC said:
"MobyGames
The definitive resource for PC games
mobygames.com"

Was there supposed to be more there?
Click to expand...

The site does not allow linking from another site. Open a new browser window and paste the link into the address bar. It worked for me.
 
Reread it, he didn't say they were more powerful than nukes... he said the only thing more powerful ARE nukes.

I know because I misread it exactly as you did, the first time.
 
Russell is no longer pulling any punches RE: JDX

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=16513&view=findpost&p=7696955

Bold and all other formatting copied over from the original post.

Russell [EMAIL="Pickering@LC" said:
Pickering@LC[/EMAIL]]
Truthseekers,

As I indicted initially your slow, smooth, covert style is nothing less than an attack and has been since the origin of this thread. So let me address you directly.

Sam Danner has everything to do with the evolution of what has happened in regards to Christopher. The source of your original quote has mentioned this in the full context of what you quoted. The fact that you're indicating the Danner situation had nothing to do with this is either absolute proof that you have spent zero time truly investigating this or the smooth operator I perceived from the first tone of your words.

You have been presented with hours of material to look into. There is much more linked off of that. But it is not truth you are seeking at all so please let that be known as a matter of integrity OK?

If you take the time to listen to just the approximately 7 hours of Danner's interviews and have any working knowledge of the Pentagon incident at all you will quickly realize geographical, chronological and factual errors one upon another. Then the story changes and the internal contradictions begin. After that it degrades from there. It is obvious.

Here are the two threads in this forum:

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...topic=7703&st=0

http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_F...topic=8567&st=0

I am posting these so that anybody reading this can familiarize themselves with the situation so that if you post anything that is misinformed again it will be obvious to all. Also, if you come back with inaccuracies that have been dealt with in the other materials that I have linked you to, I will also expose that. By the time we're done here it will be extremely obvious to all that you are not even seeking the truth in the known resources right in front of you.

Since JDX has decided to take another run at calling me a liar or question my motives I will recapitulate the last attempt of that here and what happens when you try to prove somebody is lying that doesn't lie.


ME: Just a hint. TVENN's email had nothing to do with light poles. At the very least Dylan will get a chance to read it in full.


JDX:Nothing to do with the light poles?

He stated in his email exactly that...

Im posting this just to show how Russell LIES! This is being posted based on malicious behavior of Russell Pickering.
____________________________________________________________________

QUOTE

From: TVenn <xxxxx@yahoo.com>
To: Russell Pickering <xxxxxxxxxx@bresnan.net>
Sent: Oct 2 2006, 09:21 PM
From IP: xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Russell,

Please email me at xxxxxxxxxx@yahoo.com

I think I may have evidence of the light poles being staged,
however, I would like your opinion.

TVenn

END QUOTE
___________________________________________________________________

THE TRUTH

___________________________________________________________________
From: XXXX XXXXXX
To: Russell Pickering
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: Interesting?


I apologize for the misleading content of the email. I have made attempts in the past to establish email contact with you via the Loose Change forum, however,there appears to have been some interference with those efforts.
I had to assume an administrator would be reviewing the content.

I have been following your work for a very long time and appreciate your efforts immensely.It appears I will likely be banned from the Loose Change forum
for attempting to inject a modest amount of reason to some of the claims there.
Hence, I wanted to have your email address before I was banned in case
I run across information that may substantially help in your efforts to pursue the truth.

You are on the right track with the FDR heading information. It is logically inconsistent for anyone to maintain that the FDR pressure altitude information
proves the jet did not hit the light poles and then ignore the track information
from the FDR. Lining up the FDR aircraft track with the impact point is exactly the correct approach to establish the track of the aircraft across the ground..

This character JDX , as an administrator of the Loose Change forum,is doing more to discredit the truth movement than any single individual I have encountered.

I am glad to see a voice of reason on the Loose Change forum.

Thanks for the response. I will be in touch if I find information worth your time.

________________________________________________________________

ME: ARE YOU HAPPY NOW? Dylan has been forwarded this original email with the person's full name and address to confirm this with him. You can verify this with Dylan and post a retraction about me being a liar later. This is what your 3rd failed attempt today?

The end result of this type of attack will always be the same. In regards to the Pentagon and 9/11 I do not lie, deceive and have not a single malicious or suspicious motive. My motive is to determine what happened and to contribute to the truth of 9/11 being exposed so that we can perhaps get our country back and survive the next 10 years. This I take seriously.

Do I make this response out of ego? No - I am smart enough to know if unfounded insinuation is not addressed firmly, directly and factually in short proximity to the attempts to disinform, it plants a seed that grows. And the integrity of my goals in regards to 9/11 WILL NOT be eroded by people who operate the way you do. Anonymously behind a facade with insinuation and unfounded accusation.

So here is what I suggest. That the two of you join forces. The "truth seeker" and you JDX. Take your non-factual insinuations, methodologies and tactics and apply them full force directly on me and all of my actions and words. This way you will be brought out into the open for all to see clearly in an expeditious manner.

You can try and resurrect Danner or take your FDR research and turn it into an ordinance run. That is your right. But EVERY STEP OF THE WAY I will be looking for the facts in all of it and bringing anything to light that misdirects or distracts the integrity of all of the good and honest people working hard to understand the Pentagon.

That includes Dylan and the Loose Change crew, the very thoughtful posters here and every single reader who is honestly asking questions and actually seeking the truth.

Not on my watch. Being an admin isn't required to do this. Just giving your best and being honest has worked so far.

Clear???

EDIT: Grammar
Click to expand...

I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I suspect Russell believes that Truthseekers is a JDX sock. I believe this is certainly well within the realm of possibility.
 
So at the first sight of any attempt at reason and fact by any of their constituents, the fragile facade that is CT crumbles?
 
jdx on bombing runs-"Picture also just to give an idea... not intended to show exact event or exact types of aircraft/ordinace used"

Followed by 2 images, the first image I think is NASAs scramjet being carried by a B52 and the second is the X-15 rocket plane just after being dropped from a B52.

What exactly is that to give an idea of? I'd think most people know that planes can carry ordnance under their wings which is what I think he was trying to show but that's 2 images showing planes not carrying ordnance.

All pure speculation of course..
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom