• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

James van Overschelde

I had a search for Judgements Of Learning (JOL) and I found this article.

It says:
One of the most commonly used measures of metacognition has been the "Feeling of Knowing" (FOK) judgement; after failing to answer a test item, individuals are asked to judge how well they think they would do in a multiple choice recognition test in which one of the alternatives was the correct answer. "Ease of Learning" (EOL) judgements (also called confidence judgements or self-estimates) are another measure of metacognition; individuals predict, given a test's requirements, how well they think they will perform on it. Similarly, "Judgements of Learning" (JOL) have individuals predict how well they did on a test just completed. Predicted and actual performance are compared on each of these measures, of which the absence of a discrepancy is assumed to indicate access to knowledge about one's self and cognitive abilities. Studies to date find little or no relationship between these measures however, and results are not reliably similar across testing periods or content areas (11).
So it's not a paranormal ability, and there's no evidence for it anyway.

I'm confused.
I guess Kramer is right to ask - What is he claiming, and how does he intend to demonstrate it?

As far as I can see he merely seems to want to analyse whether people can accurately predict how well they have done in tests.

I can't see the paranormal in this one.
 
The Doctor is OUT

The good Doctor has withdrawn his claim and asked us to destroy all evidence of it.

Whatever.

p.s. you're right. he was looking to promote his "research".
 
Am I the only one concerned that a Ph.D. exhibits such a fundamental grasp of the English language? He couldn't see from the application that he had to concisely submit a testable claim?
 
Just because one has an alphabet soup after one's name, it does not make one smart. It's clear van Overschelde misunderstood the primary purpose of the Challenge and good riddance to him.
 

Back
Top Bottom