How difficult is for a democracy to function in war time? I think that it's really difficult especially when we are not talking about war with the classic definition of the word but about suicide bombings that target civilians.
It seems though that Israel makes a sincere effort to balance between democracy and its need for security.
I am quite surprized that none started a thread on this matter yet-- davefoc attempted to start a discussion in SC on the topic.
On June 30 2004, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered changes to the route of the West Bank security fence, to alleviate Palestinian suffering even if this will mean less security for Israel.
I have just acquired a full copy of the Supreme Court's decision that I can upload to my webspace although it is in word format and nothing proves that it's this document indeed.
Extracts of the decision can be found in the official site of the Israeli Government here.
The court's decision with which IDF ( which is the responsible authority for the supervision of the security fence) complied immediately proves that the motives of constructing the security fence are not political as many of the critics of Israel have suggested.
Mohammed Dahla, one of the lawyers representing the Palestinians, hailed what he called a "courageous and very important" decision.
"This decision is more important than the one at The Hague because this one will be followed," he said outside the court.
Story--CNN
The Guardian
It seems though that Israel makes a sincere effort to balance between democracy and its need for security.
I am quite surprized that none started a thread on this matter yet-- davefoc attempted to start a discussion in SC on the topic.
On June 30 2004, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered changes to the route of the West Bank security fence, to alleviate Palestinian suffering even if this will mean less security for Israel.
I have just acquired a full copy of the Supreme Court's decision that I can upload to my webspace although it is in word format and nothing proves that it's this document indeed.
Extracts of the decision can be found in the official site of the Israeli Government here.
The court's decision with which IDF ( which is the responsible authority for the supervision of the security fence) complied immediately proves that the motives of constructing the security fence are not political as many of the critics of Israel have suggested.
Mohammed Dahla, one of the lawyers representing the Palestinians, hailed what he called a "courageous and very important" decision.
"This decision is more important than the one at The Hague because this one will be followed," he said outside the court.
Story--CNN
The Guardian