fishbob said:
Troll said:"Americans United says churches that support or oppose a candidate may face an IRS audit, fines and loss of tax-exempt status."
Are they serious?
fishbob said:
TragicMonkey said:Churches get their tax-exempt status because they are supposed to be religious bodies, not political action committees. If they being officially supporting particular candidates, they cross the line into politicking and must pay taxes like other organizations.
If you want special status, you have to play by the rules. Any church who wants to go into politics is welcome to do so--they just have to start paying their share in taxes, for once.
Troll said:Yes, but if they offer no financial assistance they are playing by the rules. Would telling a reporter in an interview you are for a candidate be breaking such a rule?
TragicMonkey said:The rules in question are for keeping your organization's tax exempt status. Any individual member of the church can say whatever they want --as an individual. If they were to present the view of their church as a body, then their church is not acting as a religious body but a political one. Political bodies have to pay taxes. Almost everyone has to pay taxes. Churches are the exception...and one that is questionable at best. Why shouldn't they pay taxes?
fishbob said:Originally posted by Troll:
"Americans United says churches that support or oppose a candidate may face an IRS audit, fines and loss of tax-exempt status."
I was under the impression that this meant monetary support for a candidate, however, I have been known to be wrong.
Troll said:If they are praying in churches to their congregations for one candidateover the other, I do not see how this would be a "public" support for one or the other but merely a like minded group of people sharing a thought in a place like minded people hang out at.
TragicMonkey said:Depends on how they do it. If the preacher stands up and says "Let's all pray that George Bush wins the election" then he, as the spokesman of the church, is using his religious authority and that of the tax-exempt church to publicly advance a partisan political position. To the IRS, that is not a religious activity. It is a political one.
If, however, the preacher asks the congregation to pray for "the best man to win" without naming one, then that is a general and nonpolitical statement. The church has endorsed nobody, and may keep its tax-exempt status.
Troll said:Can't really argue that, but this may seem like I am trying. How public is a church and the events that go on inside? Are they not private buildings and as such out of the realm of what would be considered private? Isn't this the reason they aren't generally hit on nativity scenes and such? And the nativity stuff is outdoors in public view whereas the rest of the stuff we're looking at here would be inside and away from the general public.
I'm seriously just trying to get a better understanding here as it pertains to the law and such.
TragicMonkey said:Depends on how they do it. If the preacher stands up and says "Let's all pray that George Bush wins the election" then he, as the spokesman of the church, is using his religious authority and that of the tax-exempt church to publicly advance a partisan political position. To the IRS, that is not a religious activity. It is a political one.
If, however, the preacher asks the congregation to pray for "the best man to win" without naming one, then that is a general and nonpolitical statement. The church has endorsed nobody, and may keep its tax-exempt status.
crimresearch said:How would that affect Quaker meetings without a pastor?
Anything that one member stands up and says is suposed to be a message from God, and I understand that God is quite the partisan in some cases.
TragicMonkey said:Good question. I guess it's up to the benevolence of the IRS. But then, do Quakers have much to be taxed? If I were the IRS and looking for sweet god-spoils, I'd focus on the denominations with all the gold and stained glass first.