• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Interview with Cleveland Center Air Controller

Here is article from Detroit Free Press - interview with John Werth who was
in Cleveland Center on 9/11 working United 93. Werth, now retired, heard
the hijacking over his headset. Had to clear air space around United 93 and
assist with Delta 1989, which was suspected as hijacked.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080911/NEWS07/809110406


Very harrowing story like our friend Cheap Shot

I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.

This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.

Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.

The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.

The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.

You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).
 
Here is article from Detroit Free Press - interview with John Werth who was
in Cleveland Center on 9/11 working United 93. Werth, now retired, heard
the hijacking over his headset. Had to clear air space around United 93 and
assist with Delta 1989, which was suspected as hijacked.

Read the article. I had the chance to meet John during the making of UAL93 we overlapped a day during the filming of the movie. That was the first time I found out that he also worked DAL1989 and that we at Boston Center were feeding them bad information on DAL1989. But one frequency mishap on that day, was all it took to be determined the aircraft was a possible hijack. I wish him the best of luck in his retirement.
 
I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.

This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.

Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.

The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.

The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.

You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).

A pile of silly and vile bilge. I suppose they'll start claiming Werth as one of their's, regardless of the facts.
 
...
This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.

Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.

The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.

The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.

You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).
Wrong as usual.

9/11 truth only grows in ignorance on 9/11. As you are proving.

Do you make up insane ideas all on your own. Your lack of evidence is showing. Insane made up ideas, based on ...

7 years and the best you can do is spew lies. Why do you lack evidence? How can you remain totally clueless and ignorant of the Hijackers? All four hijackers have DNA profiles from 93. Darn, you are caught making up lies. I doubt you will understand this.

The terrorist, you are trying to apologize for, were flying 93 to WTC they headed for DC direct. You should study before making up lies that are too easy to debunk.
 
Here is article from Detroit Free Press - interview with John Werth who was
in Cleveland Center on 9/11 working United 93. Werth, now retired, heard
the hijacking over his headset. Had to clear air space around United 93 and
assist with Delta 1989, which was suspected as hijacked.

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080911/NEWS07/809110406


Very harrowing story like our friend Cheap Shot

"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."

This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.
 
"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."

This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.
Are you high or just ignoring reality? Read Cheap Shot's post (he was there you know, I'm sure you don't care)
 
A pile of silly and vile bilge. I suppose they'll start claiming Werth as one of their's, regardless of the facts.

Why wouldn't they? They have already made attempts to claim people like Frank DeMartino as supporters despite the fact he died that day.
 
"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."

This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.

I called NEADS and told them that DAL1989 was a hijack, NEADS called the Military Specialist at Cleveland who I imagined told the OMIC, who told Werth's supervisor that DAL1989 was the hijack not UAL93. There is your deception. I was repsonsible for that mistake. There were allot of them that day, but I had my reasons to think that DAL1989 was a hijack
 
"Werth has never been sure who called the facility to warn about the flight or why, and other accounts have been murky."

This was part of the deception. The plotters made the call to distract Werth, hoping he would not notice that the hiajcking was botched and that FL93 was shot down.

Which plotters?
 
I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.

This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.

Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.

The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.

The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.

You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).

Obama: "You Can't Just Make Stuff Up,"
 
I'd like to salute the bravery and honesty of John Werth.

This interview provides important evidence that the 9/11 Commission is lying through its teeth.

Severel things he said contradict the official strory. We hope that Werth will help and dedicate some of his time and expertise to the 9/11 Truth movement, a movement which has grown and grown over the past seven years.

The special commandos who were supposed to hijack FL 93, got off the flight before it took off, because it was announced that the flight had been delayed. The two men were going to fly FL93 into WTC 7.

The second hijacking team on FL93, three men (not four as has been reported), botched the hijacking.

You can check these facts in the Terror Timeline (online).

I didn't realize it was possible to write this much and have every single sentence be wrong.

By the way, who is this "we" you are referring to? All I see is one crazy man who thinks he's Galileo.
 
I called NEADS and told them that DAL1989 was a hijack, NEADS called the Military Specialist at Cleveland who I imagined told the OMIC, who told Werth's supervisor that DAL1989 was the hijack not UAL93. There is your deception. I was repsonsible for that mistake. There were allot of them that day, but I had my reasons to think that DAL1989 was a hijack

Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.
 
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

It's not his memory at fault here.
 
Its been seven years and 9/11 was a very stressfull day, its most likely you just made a mistake. You told them it was FL93, but now remember it as the delta flight. Memories can be faulty.

Excuse me, did you just have the nerve to tell someone who was there and who's actions and reasons for those actions were recorded (iirc) that they don't know what they are talking about?
 
Excuse me, did you just have the nerve to tell someone who was there and who's actions and reasons for those actions were recorded (iirc) that they don't know what they are talking about?

No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.
 
No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.

And you are aware that the events were recorded and documented. This is done in the case of people forgetting things. So by your logic, he managed to forget and mix up in memory the flights, and a magical fairy changed his statements on tape?
 
No, I said the witness made a mistake. People claim witnesses make mistakes all the time in this forum and I'm just trying to fit in.

Where is your evidence for this alleged mistake?

Bearing in mind that witnesses do make mistakes, but those kinds of mistakes happen less often (or at least are rectified very quickly) when the information leading to their decisions, and the decisions themselves are so heavily watched and documented.
 

Back
Top Bottom