• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

in-progress, appropriately named truther site

Bitca

Student
B
Joined
Feb 17, 2016
Messages
34
A new, unfinished site by David Slesinger (and whoever is bankrolling him) called....drum roll...
physicsdenial dot com

(Sigh...still no URL privileges)

With such highlights as:

Could it really be true your teachers and professors will deny Newton’s third law? Don’t make it too hard on them. As long as they are talking to you in private, their bosses or funders won’t have to be alarmed.
Click to expand...
and
If the floors above where the planes hit on 9/11 actually were descending through the floors underneath where the planes hit, they could have crushed some floors. THEY COULD NOT HAVE CRUSHED DOZENS OF FLOORS ALL THE WAY TO THE GROUND.

That’s Newton’s third law. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. So if the floors descending did crushing, they themselves were PROPORTIONALLY crushed. Therefore, no mass would have continued to descend and do crushing all the way to the bottom.
Click to expand...

And, yes indeed, featuring his favorite Jonathan Cole video with concrete blocks.

Sigh. Hopefully it'll make as little as all of his others.
 
That would be

http://physicsdenial.com/

The domain is associated with David Slesinger himself:
http://whois.domaintools.com/physicsdenial.com
And so are the domains JenningsMystery.com and bazantmisconduct.com that he links on the frontpage of physicsdenial.com.

David Slesinger currently is in a feud with AE911Truth, has been "kicked out" by them, as was Wayne Coste, a former Board member. Coste and Slesinger apparently are co-operating on Coste's "9/11 Truth Outreach", a 501(c)(1) non-profit organization established, I believe, in 2014 that seeks donations. Slesinger may or may not be "bankrolled" by that.
 
It would be unfortunate if people were using 9/11 truth to make money. I hope that is not what is happening.
 
Oystein said:
That would be

<snip>because I can't post URLs</snip>

The domain is associated with David Slesinger himself:
<snip>because I can't post URLs</snip>
And so are the domains JenningsMystery.com and bazantmisconduct.com that he links on the frontpage of physicsdenial.com.

David Slesinger currently is in a feud with AE911Truth, has been "kicked out" by them, as was Wayne Coste, a former Board member. Coste and Slesinger apparently are co-operating on Coste's "9/11 Truth Outreach", a 501(c)(1) non-profit organization established, I believe, in 2014 that seeks donations. Slesinger may or may not be "bankrolled" by that.
Click to expand...

Thanks and yes indeed. He posted this question on Quora at the end of February:
Can any supporter of AE911Truth counter my assertion that it no longer adheres to its avowed mission of generating a real investigation?
Click to expand...
which contains this comment:
It is still their avowed mission as it should be. However, because they instituted a policy in January of not giving out lists of petition signers to qualified organizers to call from [sic], they have essentially made sure they will not support in any real way the growth of their organization.
Click to expand...

One has to wonder if they're worried that if petition signers were called they might be embarrassed by having signed it in the first place.

What's particularly funny about his latest site is that he refuses to discuss anything to do with physics publicly, at least more than handwaving. And, like so many, he doesn't understand what "action" and "reaction" mean, so he equates them to "crushing".

I guess he's planning on spewing out sites containing some lies and Cole videos, as well as begging for donations and volunteers to leaflet. Gee, you'd think he'd care about the environment a bit more, wouldn't you?
 
Sunday rant before shredding pine tree

How can you say breaking the laws of physics and keep a straight face. What is it suppose to mean. They never close the deal, they say the laws of physics were broken, meaning the building can fall without help from something they never explains.

When I see the "path of most resistance", implying mass in motion takes the "path of least resistance", ... the result means we can no longer have head on collisions, as our cars with fly into the air avoiding all other mass or paths of most resistance, which is actually breaking the laws of physics. They make up law breaking tag-lines.

That’s Newton’s third law. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. So if the floors descending did crushing, they themselves were PROPORTIONALLY crushed. Therefore, no mass would have continued to descend and do crushing all the way to the bottom. http://physicsdenial.com/
Click to expand...
Yes, it is best to ignore G when you are making up BS claims based on nonsense.

How does a mass moving stop when the weight of the mass is more than a WTC floor can hold. Therefore, even if we do the cartoon of mass stopping on each floor, and then the floor fails, the collapse continues in the fantasy world of 9/11 truth, where floors can't fail instantly due to massive overload.

How can anyone be this stupid... CIT, Balsamo, pilots for truth, 2000+ failed engineers and architects for Richard Gage's world tour club of woo... the list is long, but the percentage is small. Gullible people... now how to avoid being gullible and not buying the Nikon D500... is that being gullible.
 
Oh, dear. This completely fallacious misrepresentation of the meaning of Newton's Third Law seems to be becoming as much a truther dogma as Lysenkoism was in the Soviet Union. If it weren't for the law of conservation of angular momentum, Newton would be turning in his grave.

Dave
 
FalseFlag said:
It would be unfortunate if people were using 9/11 truth to make money. I hope that is not what is happening.
Click to expand...

Consider the conversation of angular momentum to the $5,000,000 to $8,000,000 that ae911truth take in over the last 10 years. The main recipient is a mediocre project architect who has found fame and fortune (I know a few such types who have done well, so he is not alone )

So yes I think there are a good few people doing quite well from truth, don't you?
 
FalseFlag, please support Slesinger's claim that crushed mass does not continue to descend. If you can't see how stupid a claim that is, then I can't help you understand Newton's Laws.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
Oh, dear. This completely fallacious misrepresentation of the meaning of Newton's Third Law seems to be becoming as much a truther dogma as Lysenkoism was in the Soviet Union. If it weren't for the law of conservation of angular momentum, Newton would be turning in his grave.

Dave
Click to expand...

FalseFlag said:
How? Please support your claim.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SSS0DDqfm0

Yeah, what about that law?
Click to expand...

When you shoot a bullet through a piece of paper, the paper doesn't stop the bullet. When the bullet hits the ground, you have satisfied both sides of the 3rd law equation.

When the force of the falling floors above is greater than the resistance of the one floor below, the floor below will fail and the accruing mass and squared velocity of an additional 12 foot drop will increase the kinetic energy and force until the entire building mass hits the ground, satisfying both sides of the 3rd law equation.
 
Last edited:
It's sad how these people deny science, engineering, observation and let their antidisestablishment beliefs drive them to irrational positions about 9/11. Some find it funny, others outraged that they seek financial support (for whatever)... After all this time it's clear that the hard core truth guys will never give up their beliefs.
 
pgimeno said:
And there's that "donate" button again...
Click to expand...


...he's done his market research:

smokersave_zps9ewrrfeu.jpg
 
Dave Rogers said:
FalseFlag, please support Slesinger's claim that crushed mass does not continue to descend. If you can't see how stupid a claim that is, then I can't help you understand Newton's Laws.

Dave
Click to expand...

The only Newton's laws these people understand are Fig Newton's!!!!!
 
Richard the G said:
Consider the conversation of angular momentum to the $5,000,000 to $8,000,000 that ae911truth take in over the last 10 years. The main recipient is a mediocre project architect who has found fame and fortune (I know a few such types who have done well, so he is not alone )

So yes I think there are a good few people doing quite well from truth, don't you?
Click to expand...
Maybe, and it's wrong. Of course, the ones who profited off of 9/11 are wrong, too.
 
Dave Rogers said:
FalseFlag, please support Slesinger's claim that crushed mass does not continue to descend. If you can't see how stupid a claim that is, then I can't help you understand Newton's Laws.

Dave
Click to expand...

Please copy and paste the exact text you are referring to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom