• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

How many "psychics" are magicians / mentalists?

Big Les

Philosopher
Joined
Mar 9, 2006
Messages
5,057
Location
UK
(Forgive me if this has come up before; I can't think of a suitable search string to be sure I've not missed it.)

I've often wondered about the proportions of self-deluders, informally-trained scammers, and outright mentalists that are in the business of taking money for "psychic" services. I believe Ian Rowland alludes to this "sector" of mentalism in his cold reading book, and Derren Brown has mentioned it IIRC, but I've heard little about it otherwise.

By accident, I came across this thread on a magic forum, wherein at least some posters seem quite comfortable with the idea of the latter group plying a trade. They seem to take it as read that there are "performers" out there who play psychics, take money, and actively deceive their clients into believing they have special powers. Yet more of them seem to advocate a laissez-faire "if people weren't gullible, they wouldn't get bilked" attitude.

The idea of this disturbs me greatly; does anyone have any firm info on how common this is? Have any of them been "outed"? I realise there's a fine line between performance and fraud, but to me, taking money for psychic readings without giving any idea that you're "performing" is reprehensible.

One poster rants about Rowland's concept of "psychic baiting" which personally I wish I had the balls to try for myself. I have a hard time actively and knowingly ruining someone's day, even a con-artist like a "psychic". Clearly there is some "bleeving" going on which complicates matters and strays into the "self-delusion" variety of psychic. For example, this thread. And this quote from the first thread is very telling:

Like many people, I started off doing straight Cold Reading, then I got more to grips with the divination systems I use and there's actually very little Cold Reading involved in what I do now. I use a straight interpretation of the systems mixed with intuitive flashes and, if necessary, Cold Reading to spice up the reading. I say I'm psychic, you say you don't believe it unless you get scientific proof. I say it's none of your or science's business!

This guy seems to mutated from mentalist to self-deluded "psychic", which I find quite fascinating. He's a sort of hybrid I suppose; I'm more interested in those magicians/mentalists who are "working strong" as I think Rowland calls it.
 
Last edited:
Mentalists (on that forum at least) seem so ambiguous about the whole thing, labelling sceptics who debunk psychics as closed-minded cynics and "pseudo-sceptics". One even has a thread regarding the sceptical co-opting of Ian Rowland's "Full Facts" book!

Sorry to go on about this; I just find it quite shocking that there might be not just knowing frauds, but knowing frauds that are part of what seems to me to be (in some quarters) a morally ambiguous entertainment industry. I'm sure the majority of mentalists draw the line between the likes of Browne and Brown, if you see what I mean. I'd just like to get some assessment of the infiltration of mentalism by those who never go "out of character" and make money out of people's good will, hopes and dreams. People who never suspect that it's an "act".
 
Big Les it is worrying that you link to the Magiccafe when discussing deluded psychics!
Having spent a week arguing in a thread with them "Randi backs down"(now locked)they are very trying.
 

Back
Top Bottom