• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

historical jesus

varwoche

Penultimate Amazing
Staff member
varwoche
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
18,218
Location
Puget Sound
It seems likely that a Jesus existed.

But it also seems that this is taken for granted as fact, contrary to (lack of) historical records.

I hear a lot of debate these days about who killed Jesus, but not much debate as to existence of Jesus.

I wonder if readers of this board take for granted that Jesus existed, and if so, based on what foundation other than the (historically circumspect) gospels?

varwoche
 
Hi varwoche,

This subject does come up from time to time, without much resolution (which I guess isn't too surprising as no one on this forum has got a time machine working yet ;)).

A very good resource for the arguments against the existence of an historical Jesus is The Jesus Puzzle by Earl Doherty.
 
iain said:
A very good resource for the arguments against the existence of an historical Jesus is The Jesus Puzzle by Earl Doherty.
Click to expand...
Greetings. One thing that's frustrating as I research this topic is trying to filter out the honest brokers.

varwoche
 
varwoche said:
It seems likely that a Jesus existed.

But it also seems that this is taken for granted as fact, contrary to (lack of) historical records.

I hear a lot of debate these days about who killed Jesus, but not much debate as to existence of Jesus.

I wonder if readers of this board take for granted that Jesus existed, and if so, based on what foundation other than the (historically circumspect) gospels?

varwoche
Click to expand...

So called 'historical Jesus' is a sock puppet for theological liberals.

The notion is that a late 20th century style liberal existed 2000 years ago. That is their Jesus.

As an atheist, I say bah!
 
I know spirit communication doesn't go over too big here but this may be interesting to see if it could be verified against any actual historical evidence for a Jesus.

This is from a series of four books - 1700 pages - primarily dictated by visible full-form spirit materializations of which Thomas Paine and electricity pioneer Michael Faraday were among the group leaders.

Thomas Paine on a theological god, hell and Jesus

Oration No. 8 One Josie, a Medium, was Manufactured into the Theological Jesus

Mr. Paine, you say that Jesus as taught today is a theological myth. How, then, shall we regard the pictures we receive and the alleged appearances we have of him?

Paine: That is all right. There was a man whose true name was Josie, who had medium powers not near so good as our medium here; but our medium is no more Jesus—that is, 'a savior'—than any other man or boy. He is no God; he is only Will Aber. No more God for having the gift of mediumship than some other person is God on account of his gift of music.

There is no proof, either on earth or in spirit life, that the Bible personality called Jesus Christ, as preached today, ever existed.

Question: Was that man Josie baptized in the river Jordan?

Paine: I don't know whether he was baptized in the river Jordan or in the St. Lawrence, but he was baptized; and, at the time, out of ridicule, was called Jesus; though his real name was Josie. He had the gifts of a common medium only, and never the alleged properties of a savior.

If you were passing along and were to meet a crowd of roughs who would plunge you into a mud-hole and mockingly call you Ingersoll, and say, 'How are you, Bob?' it would not make you the great Ingersoll; you would still be Mr. Nixon.

Well, that is just the way that Josie got to be a savior and finally the 'Lord God of the universe.' I do not ask you to believe this. Do as you like about that. I asked for proof of the theological allegations, and was satisfied with nothing else. No such proof was ever given me on earth, and since coming here I have found enough to convince me of what I have told you of the existence of one Josie.


Even in death ole Tom is still continuing his line of thought from his "Age of Reason" and blasting away at religion. As a secular survivalist I like this quote from : Psychic writings of Thomas Paine

The study of theology, as it stands in Christian churches, is the study of nothing; it is founded on nothing; it rests on no principles; it proceeds by no authority; it has no data; it can demonstrate nothing and it admits of no conclusion.

Not anything can be studied as a science, without your being in possession of the principles upon which it is founded; and, as this is not the case with Christian theology, it is therefore the study of nothing.
 
Some of the better threads on the historicity of Jesus (remember "The Titulus from Jesus' Cross?") have been pruned, unfortunately.

I would recommend John P. Meier's multivolume A Marginal Jew: Rethinking the Historical Jesus. In my opinion, it is the best-researched, best-written and best-argued of the currently available crop of skeptical historical investigations. Indeed, it's widely viewed as the gold standard in late-20th-century historical Jesus scholarship.
 
Some of the better threads on the historicity of Jesus (remember "The Titulus from Jesus' Cross?") have been pruned, unfortunately.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes:

Let me check Santa Claus again...
 
So that's what the H stands for!

Jesus Historical Christ! At last we know!

Religions have to start with somebody, so the existence of a Jesus is pretty likely. Several Jesuses have been posited, and certainly the gospels seem at times to describe rather different individuals. But there's nothing implausible in the idea of a charismatic prophesy-monger gathering a following that grew into a permanent cult; Mohammad and Joseph Smith are examples. (Yes, I know, some have questioned the existence of Mohammad, but what's the point? Somebody dreamed that stuff up.)

For long centuries now, people have been creating their own Jesuses. "Your personal saviour, custom-made while U wait!" Well, why not? Religion is always a matter of making things up and then believing them.

My Jesus is the one who got the woman taken in adultery off the hook. That's a circumstantial, uncomfortably believeable Near Eastern story; it could happen today.
 
If there was a Jesus, then he was probably more an idealized symbol than an actual person. Like King Arthur, who if he existed would have actually been a one of several tribal leaders from many centuries prior to today's medievil popular concept, who's stories were orally handed down, changed and homogenized until more contemporary times.

Other examples could be older stories and events that were co-opted for the carpenter-cult (Christmas replaced a pagan holiday, Noah's Ark was a fish from older tales, the name of the devil was derived from a regional tribe people spent centuries fighting, etc.)

I even read once that Jesus was called the 'Black Priest' because the early writers of the biblical records didn't really agree with what he was doing and was upsetting the status-quo, something that is ignored in later writings as the political winds changed. If there was a Jesus, he was probably a real rabble-rousing Rabbi!
 
Re: So that's what the H stands for!

sackett said:
Jesus Historical Christ! At last we know!

Religions have to start with somebody, so the existence of a Jesus is pretty likely
Click to expand...
Well Crappy Krishna Crumpets! Thanks for the mother of all non sequiturs! Religions have to start with somebody, so the existence of a Vishnu is pretty likely.

sackett said:
My Jesus is the one who got the woman taken in adultery off the hook. That's a circumstantial, uncomfortably believeable Near Eastern story; it could happen today.
Click to expand...
That is rather unfortunate ...
Some well-loved stories also disappeared in the text so carefully an long preserved og Mount Sinai. The eighth chapter of St John's Gospel, in the received text, contains the story of a woman who had been caught committing adultery. The scribes and the Pharisees wish to stone her to death, following, as they say, the lay of Moses. Jesus says, 'He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her'. One by one the woman's accusers slip away, until she and Jesus are alone together. Then he asks her, 'Where are your accusers? Has no-one condemned you?' She answers, 'No-one my Lord'. Jesus responds, 'Neither do I condemn you. Go, and sin no more.'

We now know that some ancient manuscripts transfer this story elsewhere in the New Testament, to the Gospel of Luke. In some manuscripts the scribes have indicated that they doubt its authenticity. It nowhere appears in either Vaticanus or Sinaiticus. [pg. 130]

- see Secrets of Mount Sinai: The story of finding the world's oldest bible - Codex Sinaitus; by James Bentley
Click to expand...
Your Jesus appers to be somewhat of a late-comer.
 
Re: So that's what the H stands for!

sackett said:
Religions have to start with somebody, so the existence of a Jesus is pretty likely.
Click to expand...

I don't buy this line of reasoning. If religion is - as Joseph Campbell said - misunderstood myth, then we don't need an historical Jesus for Xianity to florish - just ignorance.

It is as if the followers of Mithra suddenly were convinced Mithra actually existed. And with the encouragement of Mithric church fathers - were able to erase writings that claimed otherwise.
 
Riddick said:
Collateral proof of Jesus
Click to expand...
This laundry list gets regurgitated periodically and to the point where it gets rather tiresome. Why don't you just pick the "proof" that you find most probative and defend it? I assume that you would not have posted something in which you could find nothing worthy of defending.
 
I really don't think it matters much either way. We suspect that there was a historical King Arthur as well, but that doesn't for a moment prove the existance of magical swords. In the same way, showing a historical Josh doesn't do a thing for the Christian mythology, does it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom