• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Here is one rescue worker who was "in on it"

Why don't you ask him why he isn't part of the truth movement?
 
theauthor said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9CXQY-bZn4

"We are walking back because the building is about to blow up"

How did he know building 7 was about to "blow up"?
Click to expand...

And this supports your insane theory about the gubmint rigging an empty building no one died in that has nothing to do with the subsequent actions taken by the gubmint, be it Afghanistan, Iraq or bills passed how? :rolleyes:

Apart from that, I think you still have some questions pending for an answer here.
Not to mention explosion does not automatically equal demolitions. But who am I telling that? I don't want to stress the MA I guess. :)
 
Last edited:
mrbaracuda said:
And this supports your insane theory about the gubmint rigging an empty building no one died in that has nothing to do with the subsequent actions taken by the gubmint, be it Afghanistan, Iraq or bills passed how? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


Why did he say it was about to blow up?
 
theauthor said:
"We are walking back because the building is about to blow up"

How did he know building 7 was about to "blow up"?
Click to expand...

WTC 7 didn't "blow up." The individual was mistaken, or else you are ascribing a meaning to his words that he never intended.

Very simple.
 
theauthor said:
Answer the question.
Click to expand...

Did he know? Was he using hyperbole? Did he help with explosives? Was he allowed to say this on camera? Is he the only one who knows of the explosives being planted?

Sure I find the statement odd but no one has decided to follow up and find the guy who said it, so this statement is meaningless until you know if he actually meant "bring down with explosives."
 
Last edited:
theauthor said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9CXQY-bZn4

"We are walking back because the building is about to blow up"

How did he know building 7 was about to "blow up"?
Click to expand...
since WTC7 didnt "blow up" he was wrong

as for how he knew "it'll be coming down soon" judging the structural soundness of a damaged/burning building is something that firefighters are trained to do

so now why dont you answer the question about why he isnt part of the truth movement?
 
Garb said:
Did he know? Was he using hypserbole? Did he help with explosives? Was he allowed to say this on camera? Is he the only one who knows of the explosives being planted?

Sure I find the statement odd but no one has decided to follow up and find the guy who said it, so this statement is meaningless until you know if he actually meant "bring down with explosives."
Click to expand...

He didnt just say blow up, he said "about to". How did he know that? Even if they feared collapse, how could he know it would be that imminent? Nobody, especially a proffessional like that, would describe a feared collapse as "about to blow up"....unless he knew it was about to blow up.
 
Oh and why aren't there any sounds of explosions in the raw news footage of the collapse of WTC 7 which has sound ?
 
defaultdotxbe said:
since WTC7 didnt "blow up" he was wrong

as for how he knew "it'll be coming down soon" judging the structural soundness of a damaged/burning building is something that firefighters are trained to do

so now why dont you answer the question about why he isnt part of the truth movement?
Click to expand...

He was wrong? Why did he say it in the first place? "Blow up" is a very different concept to "collapse"
 
On a day such as September 11th, with planes flying into buildings, people jumping to their deaths, two huge buildings collapsing and the entire world's press trained on the streets of New York, I think you can forgive a man for using a common word like 'blow up' in excitable circumstances such as this. As this man has not come forward with this remarkable story of rigged buildings, it seems somewhat likely he was using an understandable hyperbole.

Curious how people such as you -the author- take almost anything like this as literal truth, yet you brush away Ramzi Bin Al-Shibh's 2002 audio-confession for no other reason than it not supporting your theory.
 
Last edited:
theauthor said:
He didnt just say blow up, he said "about to". How did he know that?
Click to expand...

Creaking, fire, and structural damage.

theauthor said:
Even if they feared collapse, how could he know it would be that imminent? Nobody, especially a proffessional like that, would describe a feared collapse as "about to blow up"....unless he knew it was about to blow up.
Click to expand...

What time did he make the statement and how long afterwards did the building collapse? Was this while they were setting up a collapse zone? After? Before?

And you forget the fact that he could be using a strange form of hyperbole. Someone should go and ask him.
 
R.Mackey said:
I don't follow you. People manage to be mistaken all the time, as you magnificently demonstrate.

And, as I stated, that was only one possibility.
Click to expand...

So why would he use the phrase "blow up"? Whether he turned out to be right or wrong, what was behind his use of that phrase?

If you were a professional in that situation where 2 towers have already collapsed, would you casually go around telling civilians that buildings were about to blow up?
 
"We are walking back because the building is about to blow up"
Click to expand...

What did this gentleman say he meant by this? Obviously the "truth" movement wouldn't run this without confirming this persons meaning:rolleyes:. Can we see the follow up interview the "truthers" made?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom