• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Help! Need Some Intelligent Views From Here!

Oliver

Penultimate Amazing
Oliver
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
17,396
Please complete the List of Questions with your expieriences so far:

1. Why did "they" make it look like a controlled demolition?
2. Why didn´t "they" blow building 7 in the dust cloud of the Towers?
3. Why does the debris fall faster than the "freefall"-Towers?
4. Why did "they" need 6.000.000.000 Eyewittnesses for the "controlled demolition"?
5. Why did they fake the Saddam WMD-evidence?
6. Why didn´t they plan to blame Saddam before starting the "inside job"?
7. Why did they use "1 frame per second"-cameras to proof the pentagon-impact?
8. Why didn´t they install cameras to capture "their coup" at the pentagon?

...

Please borrow me your intellect to complete the list and to make ´em look really stupid...
 
Come on... Where are the "TRUTHSEEKER´s" in here... Muhawhawawawawaw... :D
 
i compiled this list some time ago

1: Why would high ranking Pentagon officials (including Donald Rumsfeld) avoid flying? Surely they would know what planes were to be hijacked and could simply avoid those/

2: Why warn San Franciso mayor Willie Brown not to fly, did they forget no planes from San Francisco were part of the plan?

3: Why bother calling off investigations of al Qeada, if the got is the guilty party anyway what difference does it make?

4: Why bother calling off investigations of Osama bin Laden's relatives?

5: Why bother giving the White House staff Cipro when you already know they won't be sent any anthrax.

6: Why allow 7 of your reported hijacker to be alive? Why not kill them all, or use fake terrorists?

7: Why use planes at 1/4 passenger capacity? Your killing 3000 in the towers, whats another 100 or so on the planes.

8: Why bother planting a passport of Satam al-Suqami in Manhattan? Surely they could come up with suspects simply by looking at the passenger manifests, then arrange to find evidence in their homes.

9: Why use Hani Hanjour, who couldn't fly a single engine Cessna airplane, as your patsy pilot? Why not someone with more skill?

10: Why would silverstein sign a 99 year lease on two buildings that are about to be destroyed? Why not allow them to be destroyed then buy the land dirt cheap?

11: Why insure the buildings that are about to be destroyed for less than half what they are worth?

12: Why even bother pulling Muslim websites on 9/10/01?

13: Why allow the FBI say it has "No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11?"

14: Why fire a missile (or anything other than a 757) into the Pentagon and then claim it was a 757? Why not use a missile and say it was a missile, or a 757 and say it was a 757?

15: Why have said "757" execute "impossible" maneuvers prior to hitting the pentagon?

16: Why have Flight 93 land in Cleveland and say it crashed? Why not just crash it too?

17: Why fake cell phone calls at all?

18: Why release passenger manifests not showing the hijackers? Only to release new lists years later missing some passengers?

19: If bin Laden is a CIA operative, why would he profess innocence of the attacks? Did someone forget to send him the script?

20: Why run the risk of using fake, or CGI planes at the WTC? Why not just use a real plane, or fir a missile and say it was a missile?
Click to expand...

ETA: another tough question for truthers who claim no one coems forward due to fear of losing their job/pension/paid off/ect

would you assist in the coverup if you were paid? if so, how much?
Click to expand...
to date no truther has provided me with an answer
 
Last edited:
more: why no whistleblowers?

Many claim only a small group of individuals would have to be involved in the conspiracy in order to pull off 9/11, but these are only the people who would need to see the "Big Picture" many hundreds or thousands of others would have to know something isn't right.


CD Experts: Why do they not agree that the WTC towers came down in a manner consistant with controlled demolition?


Structural Engineers: Why don't they claim the towers should not have fallen from the damage they sustained?


FAA/NORAD/NEADS/Airline Employees: Why do none of them claim the response to the 9/11 hijackings was not normal?


Military Personel: Any not high enough up the chain of command to be in on the "Big Picture" must realize the military repsonse to 9/11 was unusual. Why don't they say there was an unusually large number of wargames planned for the day? Or that there were too few fighters on alert?


Pentagon Responders: Why do none of the first responders here mention a 16 foot hole? Or that damage was inconsistant with a 757?


Pentagon Witnesses: Why do so many people say they saw a large commercial airliner? (please don't bother with the 2 or 3 who say they saw a smaller plane, tell me why dozens if not hundreds saw a large jetliner)


Shanksville Responders: Why do none of them say the debris was inconsistant with a plane crash?


Shanksville Investigators: Why don't they tell us the Flight 93 site was unlike any other airliner crash?


Cleveland-Hopkins Employees: Why does no one support the idea that Flight 93 landed there?


WTC Insurers: Why are they not pursuing fraud charges?


FDNY: Why do no firemen come forward saying the sounds they heard inside the WTC towers were unlike any other fire they had been in before?




Why do they not come forward?



It can't be complicity: These people are not involved in the conspiracy, so they would have no motivation to protect it.


It can't be money: There's too many people to assume they have all be "bought off" or are all afraid of losing their jobs.


It can't be fear: Again, there are too many people to assume they fear physical reprisal, and FDNY particularly, they risk their lives every day for total strangers, they would certainly risk their lives to uncover the murder of over 300 of their Brothers.
Click to expand...
 
GREAT QUESTIONS, Defaultdotxbe! ... This is good stuff. :D I hope others will join us, too. :)

Thank you very, very much.

BTW: What´s your forename? I´m always confused to talk to Nicknames...
 
Last edited:
its Kevin (although now you might confuse me with the guy who posts here as kevin, lol)
 
defaultdotxbe said:
its Kevin (although now you might confuse me with the guy who posts here as kevin, lol)
Click to expand...

You mean this Kevin? :
11107451ffb149373a.gif


I have no problem with both of you, Kevin - especially since his animation is burned into my mind... :D
 
Bob? Marky? Abby? Chipmunk? Gravy? Pardalis? Foolmewunz? Bell?... What are your ideas?
 
Last edited:
1. If the NWO/BUSH/PNAC wanted to pull off a "JetLiners as Weapons" attack, then why use a missile instead of a Jetline at the Pentagon?

2. If the NWO/BUSH/PNAC wanted to pull off a "Jetliner as Weapons" attack, then why have UA93 Crash in the middle of nowhere, doing no damage at all (given that the theory is that no passengers were on board the planes).

3. If The plan was to hit the buildings with planes, and then have them collapse via controlled demolition, than why did they wait SEVEN HOURS to bring down WTC7?

4. If they faked the voices of the passenger calls, than how was one of the "fakers" able to give a relative on the ground the correct combination to her safe in one of the calls?

There are a few off top of my head. I will give more as I think of them.

TAM
 
Even though I didn't make your list of serious thinkers, I'll give it a shot:

I think you may have a problem with always asking them why something happened instead of asking them how it happened.

Try asking;
How were the explosives planted?

How was the missile launched at the Pentagon?

How was flight 93 shot down?

etc etc.

The answers will show how these people have no facts, only paranoid speculations and physics inspired by Hollywood science fiction.
 
Brainache said:
Even though I didn't make your list of serious thinkers, I'll give it a shot:

I think you may have a problem with always asking them why something happened instead of asking them how it happened.

Try asking;
How were the explosives planted?

How was the missile launched at the Pentagon?

How was flight 93 shot down?

etc etc.

The answers will show how these people have no facts, only paranoid speculations and physics inspired by Hollywood science fiction.
Click to expand...

These are good questions, Brainache - but my intention is to find questions wich make all their theories look stupid. Your questions are too complex. I need more general ones. :) But i appreciate your ideas, too - to make progress. :)
 
Last edited:
I think the most common have been addressed allready, I'll try.

1.) Why fly into the strongest side of the Pentagon, next to a highway, none the less, where the were countless wittnesses.

2.) If Bush knew, then why did he sit dumbfolded infront of the class for minutes.

3.) Why did FAA ground all flights, if only 4 where to be hijacked?
 
Bell said:
I think the most common have been addressed allready, I'll try.

1.) Why fly into the strongest side of the Pentagon, next to a highway, none the less, where the were countless wittnesses.

2.) If Bush knew, then why did he sit dumbfolded infront of the class for minutes.

3.) Why did FAA ground all flights, if only 4 where to be hijacked?
Click to expand...

My favorite is Number2 - this is a very good one, Bell. :D BTW: What´s your forename?

ETA: DarkMagician?, Puggy?, DrDave?, R.Mackey?, HappyCat?, Abbyas?, Senor_Pointy?, jhunter1163?, ihaunter?, GlennB?, BillC?, hurdygurdy?, twinstead?, Honir?
 
Dog Town said:
Christo....pheraaaaa!!!!
Click to expand...

Hello Martijn, :) i never heard that name but i guess it means Martin in germany - so welcome to the Thread, Martijn. :)

Dog Town? Your ideas beside your great and always funny remarks? :D

Abby?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom