• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Google OS - for free

Oliver

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Aug 12, 2006
Messages
17,396
My brother told me that there will be a Google OS in 2010 and it might be for free as well. Anyone heard of this before?
 
My brother told me that there will be a Google OS in 2010 and it might be for free as well. Anyone heard of this before?

Every year since about 2003 or 2004. As of the current announcement, it looks like they've foregone trying to build an OS from the ground up and are instead creating a Linux front-end. I expect it'll be similar in nature to the XO from the OLPC project (which I have at home).
 
It's worse than just another Linux distribution, because they're using their own windowing system (from Android?) rather than X11, which means it won't even be able to run all the existing Linux applications.
 
It's worse than just another Linux distribution, because they're using their own windowing system (from Android?) rather than X11, which means it won't even be able to run all the existing Linux applications.

Do you have some inside info that says their own windowing system will not be compatible?
 
Do you have some inside info that says their own windowing system will not be compatible?
Er, no, but seeing as its their own windowing system made for Android, it's probably reasonable to suspect that they didn't just reimplement X11.
 
Er, no, but seeing as its their own windowing system made for Android, it's probably reasonable to suspect that they didn't just reimplement X11.

This is true, but I wouldn't rule it out completely. My guess is that they'll go a similar route that OLPC has gone, and while using (most of) X11, they'll replace it with their own front-end.
 
Have to give Googles marketing department credit getting headlines everywhere for a product that will never reach 1 percent market share. What OEM is going to invest heavy in this product when for 10 bucks more they can get a Windows 7 license that will actually be cheaper when accounting for return rates and support.
 
Sure, Google's products are "free" in the sense that you don't pay out of pocket for them.

All they ask is you give up your identity, personal tastes, social networks, marketing information and contact information to them, their affiliates and their friendly datacenters.

Forever. Until the day you die.
 
I dont mean to get OT but I have a G1.
It runs android.
All the WINMO haters love to rave about how great the Android OS is for the g1.
Well bottom line is that it has problems too!
Watch all the windows haters will rave about how great google PC OS is and it will probably have issues just like every OS does.
 
and it might be for free as well.
You do realise that Google's customers are the people who place advertisements with them.

Those of us who use Google's technology are the product. Saying "hey look Google is giving us something for free" is the same as pigs saying "hey look, the farmer is feeding us for free" except that our fate will probably not be as extreme as being bacon sandwiches.
 
ChromeO/S isn't going to be based on Android so who knows what it's going to run like

"Google has already developed an open-source operating system called Android that is used in mobile phones. The software is also being built into netbooks by several manufacturers.

But Google has not encouraged netbook makers to use Android. The company appears to be positioning Chrome OS as its preferred operating system for netbooks, though it said competition between the two systems would likely drive innovation.

“It makes total sense,” Mr. Augustin said. “Android wasn’t really meant for netbooks.” "

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/technology/companies/08operate.html?_r=2&hp
 
This is true, but I wouldn't rule it out completely. My guess is that they'll go a similar route that OLPC has gone, and while using (most of) X11, they'll replace it with their own front-end.
I don't think so. I believe they're using their own windowing system, originally developed for Android. It's not just a window manager/desktop environment running on top of X, it's completely separate.

Not that it matters much, since all they seem to care about is making a light-weight OS that runs a web browser and not much else.
 
I don't think so. I believe they're using their own windowing system, originally developed for Android.

You believe wrong.

Quote:

On the Google blog, Sundar Pichai, VP product management and Linus Upson, engineering director, emphasise that Chrome OS is different from Android

From the link in post #2
 
Last edited:
You believe wrong.
Yes...? I don't see where I claimed it was the same product, only that they are taking with them the windowing system from Android.

Android is a very closed OS for small devices and only runs Java applets. It makes sense that you don't want that on a computer.
 
Last edited:
Yes...? I don't see where I claimed it was the same product, only that they are taking with them the windowing system from Android.

I am confused because I have yet to see where Google said it is the android windowing system. Can you cite that?

I was under the impression that much like gnome or kde they're going to use the x11 libs with their own window manager, but not that it is the windowing system Android uses.
 
Last edited:
I am confused because I have yet to see where Google said it is the android windowing system. Can you cite that?
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/introducing-google-chrome-os.html

Google Chrome OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips and we are working with multiple OEMs to bring a number of netbooks to market next year. The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel. For application developers, the web is the platform.
I'm sure you could interpret that in several ways, but I read it to mean more than just a new window manager, and since they've already got the technology from Android, why would they be reinventing their own wheel?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom