• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Fowlsound in the Commentary!

TJ

Amateur Rhythmatist
Joined
Jul 18, 2005
Messages
2,351
I don't know about you, but I very much enjoyed Fowlsound's contribution to this week's SWIFT, just as I enjoyed his original essay on the topic. For those who haven't done so already, do yourself a favor and read it. http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=49403

As much as Mr. Federlein disclaims his writing abilities, education, etc., you would not expect such a cogent, passionate, and well-written essay from him. Although David is very humble and self-depracating, the fact remains that he is a remakably intelligent, witty, sassy, sweet and talented guy. Don't let his humility fool you.

I feel very fortunate to have been able to hang out with him and his wife-to-be at TAM4, and I am very much looking forward to the same at TAM5.

David, I salute you. *bows*


This topic brought me to an interesting line of thought this morning, however. Throughout the recent years of my life, my nephew had leukemia, mom had skin cancer, dad had an inoperable cyst in the 3rd ventricle of his brain, and I may very well have a basal cell carcinoma on the back of my head (awaiting biopsy result).

I completely agree that the people selling what they know to be fraudulent 'treatments' are the lowest of the low, the likes of which only Sylvia Brown and John Edward can compare too. What bothers me nearly as much as the charlatans though, are the people who inadvertantly maintain the hope in these cures.

I can't really blame the people for sharing testimonials from there bridge partner's son-in-law's second cousin who had a friend that knew someone who was cured by acupuncture. Maybe it's human nature to gossip, maybe they just want to feel like they're helping, I don't know. I'm sure the intentions are good, but this pervasive rumor-mongering has made the alternative 'medicine' industry completely self-sustaining.

Most notably, the victims of whatever disease don't want to "limit their options", which also keeps the bunk alive and well.

I wish I had a solution, but it's going to be a long fight for us. I'm ready to fight, which brings me back to David Federlein. We may be able to do nothing on a grand scale, but fighting 4th and 5th-hand testimonials with real experiences, such as Fowlsound did here so wonderfully, is a real and very tangible tool that we can share with others to show them the truth.

Thank you, my friend. You continue to be an inspiration to me.
 
And I just thought you were an angry old grinch. I guess you can be on the "good" list.

For now.


Santa
 
Fowl, it was so neat to see your before and after photos together!

WOW!!!

I mean just WOW!!!

You are pretty cool, but your surgeons - they are VERY impressive!
 
Fowl, it was so neat to see your before and after photos together!

WOW!!!

I mean just WOW!!!

You are pretty cool, but your surgeons - they are VERY impressive!



Yeah, the nuerosurgeon that did the operation had a team of his students on hand during the surgery (11 hours, I imagine he needed a break or two) but he is absolutely the most impressive doctor I have ever met. MD fro Harvard, PhD from MIT and 12 years of head of nuerosurgery in Pennsylvania before he came to Minnesota. He also is a very warm and caring nice man. My oncologist is also a great guy. Very nice and very knowledgeable. I am lucky.

The true heroes are my docs.
 
I was disappointed to find no mention whatsoever of asparagus. Nice work though.
 
Good work, David.

I went and glanced at the commentary today, and there you were!

Warmest regards,
Kelly
 
Cool commentary, fowlsound! Didn't say anything much I didn't already reckon. But, It makes for a great, emotionally-driven "beginner's guide" to avoiding "alternative" procedures. It gives me something else to shove into the face of some gullible folks I know.
 
Very nice bit, fowlsound, and reasonably well speeled two, but couldn't you work chickens in there somewhere?
 
Fowl: I liked the original paper better, because a) I gave you some minor editing tips on that, and b) You didn't have to hold back linguistically when trying to describe your disgust with the snake oil quacks.

But hey, getting it put up on Randi's very own commentary page is still damn cool. Way to go. :cool:
 
Man, I read the thread title fast, and what I saw was "fowlsound in the cemetary!" and my heart skipped a beat. Geez, I'm still recovering.

I'll read the commentary now. :)
 
Nicely written, fowlsound. I had no idea you could be so polite and eloquent. I linked all my friends to your article. It's that good!

Also, you wrote over a hundred words without even mentioning boobies once! Congratulations. :D
 

Back
Top Bottom