Good Lt
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2007
- Messages
- 1,498
Another "Important Action Alert" from Uncle Fetzer at OpEd News.
LCF thread making the jubilant announcement, presumably without reading the article.
No. I'm actually sure they didn't read the article. It's merely one of Fetzer's masturbatory fantasies. He thinks that because NIST actually responded to Scholars that "the logjam is breaking."
NIST tells Judy "Energy Beams" Wood to pound sand:
Fetzer goes on to quote himself, Kevin Barrett and Judy Wood, as if they're pillars of credibility.
INSiDe JorB!1Lol
It sure is, Dr. Loonwaffle.
Fetzer thinks Woody's credentials are impecable, as well. I love how Fetzer wrote the article, and refers to himself in the third person.
Good Lt. find this uproariously funny.

LCF thread making the jubilant announcement, presumably without reading the article.
No. I'm actually sure they didn't read the article. It's merely one of Fetzer's masturbatory fantasies. He thinks that because NIST actually responded to Scholars that "the logjam is breaking."
NIST tells Judy "Energy Beams" Wood to pound sand:
In a letter dated July 27, 2007, Catherine Fletcher of NIST commented on Dr. Wood’s original RFC, stating, “NIST has examined the photographs you provided in conjunction with all the other evidence and has found that the evidence does not support a theory involving directed energy weapons.” She also stated, “ARA was determined not to have an organizational conflict of interest”. Finally, she added, “NIST is denying your request for correction because the NIST analysis of the initiation of the collapse of the WTC towers was thorough and based on all of the available evidence, and NIST continues to believe that the report is not fraudulent, deceptive or misleading.”
Fetzer goes on to quote himself, Kevin Barrett and Judy Wood, as if they're pillars of credibility.
Several studies demonstrating that The 9/11 Commission Report (2004) is not true have been published in The 9/11 Conspiracy (2007), which Fetzer edited. From her analysis of the breadth and the depth of damage inflicted upon the WTC, Dr. Wood has concluded that some type of directed energy weapon (DEW) was involved in the destruction of the WTC buildings.
INSiDe JorB!1Lol
On July 27, 2007, Attorney Jerry Leaphart observed on “The Dynamic Duo”, a radio program hosted by Kevin Barrett, Ph.D., on GCN (gcnlive.com), “What I can tell you and the listeners, Kevin, is this. There is more admissible evidence associated with the theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weapons than there is admissible evidence for any single other theory out there that has been promulgated.” Go to http://drjudywood.com/media/070727_JerryLeaphartRFC_Adm.mp3 . Fetzer, who co-hosts the program with Barrett, emphasized that this is a very important step on behalf of an alternative account of the mode of destruction of the WTC. “Indeed,” he said, “the official account now hangs by very slender threads.”
It sure is, Dr. Loonwaffle.
Fetzer thinks Woody's credentials are impecable, as well. I love how Fetzer wrote the article, and refers to himself in the third person.
The appeal may be found at http://drjudywood.com/pdf/070822_RFC_Appeal17a_JW.pdf .
“I don’t know why NIST did not simply post the higher quality color images,” Fetzer said, “but they are available to the agency and to the public by means of her web site. The course of this appeal should be interesting.” According to him, Dr. Wood is the leading scientist who is investigating the destruction of the WTC. “Judy’s credentials are impeccable,” he said. “She is an admirable example of what an expert can produce. Anyone who wants to understand what happened to the WTC should visit her web site. NIST has a great deal to learn from her.”
Good Lt. find this uproariously funny.
