Totovader
Game Warden
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2007
- Messages
- 3,321
In another one of his "press releases" Fetzer dives head first into the pool of crackpottery- by stating that the "analysis" done by Ace Baker is worthy of attention.
What was his final tipping point? Get this...
Like Ace- he seems to miss the problem of "video fakery" entirely.
The only good news is that he's starting to put Barrett in the corner. If all conspiracists start going to this no-planer/video fakery nonsense... we won't have much work to do at all: they debunk themselves and nobody takes their claims as credible.
On Barrett:
Link
What was his final tipping point? Get this...
Fetzer said he was affected in his thinking when relatives traveled to Madison from Milwaukee to visit with his daughter and son-in-law. “They wanted to watch a Brewer’s game, so we put it on TV,” he explained. “They had a favorite announcer who was on radio. So we put the radio by the television. To our astonishment, the radio broadcast was so far ahead of the television coverage that we knew whether it would be a ball, a strike, or a hit before the ball had left the pitcher’s hand. I realized deception was possible.”
Like Ace- he seems to miss the problem of "video fakery" entirely.
The only good news is that he's starting to put Barrett in the corner. If all conspiracists start going to this no-planer/video fakery nonsense... we won't have much work to do at all: they debunk themselves and nobody takes their claims as credible.
On Barrett:
Kevin Barrett, the founder of MUJCA and a member of Scholars, reports he is troubled by these new studies. “I guess I’ll have to take this possibility more seriously now,” Barrett said. “In the past, I have assumed video fakery was far-fetched and that anyone who endorsed it was probably a crackpot! Now I’m not so sure.” Morgan Reynolds, former Chief Economist in the Department of Labor of the Bush administration, has gone further, contributing a chapter to a new book from Scholars, The 9/11 Conspiracy, which argues video fakery may have been used to conceal the absence of planes actually impacting the building, a more controversial claim.
Link
