JamesDillon
Master Poster
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Messages
- 2,631
And on the lighter side of the global struggle against violent extremism, it appears that Islamic fundamentalists in Baghdad have issued a fatwa against falafel vendors:
So, a number of people have been shot for selling a product that did not exist at the time of Mohammed. If only things that existed at the time of Mohammed are acceptable for Muslim use, wouldn't the list of banned items include, in addition to falafel, the guns used to shoot people? As the article notes,
http://www.metimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20060606-021622-6003rSeveral vendors of the popular deep-fried chickpea sandwich were told they had just two weeks to change their profession or face death. And indeed, several vendors where shot and killed simply for selling falafel sandwiches. The logic offered by the religious zealots - if there is any - in imposing this inane diktat on the people is that there were no falafels in the time of the Prophet Mohammed.
So, a number of people have been shot for selling a product that did not exist at the time of Mohammed. If only things that existed at the time of Mohammed are acceptable for Muslim use, wouldn't the list of banned items include, in addition to falafel, the guns used to shoot people? As the article notes,
Indeed there were no falafels in ancient Arabia. However, it might be worth pointing out to these same zealots - preferably with much tact - that in the days of the prophet there were no Kalashnikov automatic rifles with which to shoot those who did not follow orders.
Last edited: