• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"Expelled" to be Re-Released?

MattusMaximus

Intellectual Gladiator
Joined
Jan 26, 2006
Messages
15,948
I recently received the following unsolicited email; I have no idea how I got on this "list". I have passed it on to both the NCSE and Pandas Thumb. Did anyone else here get this email? What are your thoughts about it?

From: "Film.News.Now" <film.news.now@gmail.com>
Subject: Yoko Ono Lawsuit Expelled!
To: ****************
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:03:21


Yoko Ono Lawsuit Expelled!: Judge Rules in Favor of Expelled Producers;
Film To Be Re-Released In Theaters This Summer

July 17, 2008 - (Studio City, CA) - The producers of the controversial
film, Expelled, are celebrating their first legal victory in the
lawsuit brought against them by Yoko Ono, for including John Lennon's song
Imagine in their documentary. Last month, a federal court in Manhattan
denied Ono's request for an injunction against the film that would have
forced it out of theaters nationwide. The producers are celebrating
this victory by announcing that the film will be re-released theatrically
this summer across the United States.

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, a documentary exploring one of the
nation's most contentious and longest running battles, the argument over
where and how life began, starring author/actor/economist Ben Stein
debuted at #10 at the box office but saw its theatrical run marred by the
Ono lawsuit.

"We had many individuals and groups who had planned to see the film,
but decided not to because the cloud of doubt this lawsuit brought to the
film," noted one of the film's producers John Sullivan. "We came out
of the gate with strong momentum only to have our integrity questioned
by this frivolous lawsuit. While we're thrilled with the film's having
earned nearly $8 million dollars during its first run, we've heard from
enough people and groups who want to see it in their theaters that
we've agreed to re-release it-this time without an undeserved cloud over
its head."

Shortly after the film's release, Ono filed a suit against the film's
producers, Premise Media, seeking damages for alleged copyright
infringement because the song had not been licensed for use in the film. On May
19, 2008 the parties agreed to a voluntary temporary restraining order
while they awaited Manhattan U.S. District Court Judge Sydney H.
Stein's ruling on Ono's motion to enjoin the showing and distribution of the
film. The restraining order prevented the producers from making
additional copies of the film for distribution. However, on June 2 Stein
denied the injunction and noted that Premise Media was likely to succeed
on its fair use defense. In his decision Stein wrote, "the doctrine
provides that the fair use of copyrighted work for purposes of criticism
and commentary is not an infringement of copyright."

"I'm not related to Judge Stein in any way," noted Expelled's star Ben
Stein, "but we are related in this sense: we are both fans of the first
amendment and I am grateful that the legal system set aside this
attempt to shut our film up. We will not be silenced. In fact it will have
the opposite effect: we will re-release it and allow millions of
Americans to go to the box office and register their vote against Ms. Ono and
her attempt to keep them from watching our film."

The court ruling prevents Ono from interfering with the national
re-release of the film this summer and the company has come up with an
ambitious plan to make the film available to any group which would like to
bring the film to a local theater. Working in conjunction with the film's
distributor Rocky Mountain Pictures, Expelled will be made available
to any group of 250-300 people at a cost of low as $6 per ticket.

"We have 1,000 prints ready to be shipped out to any group that would
like to bring the movie to their local theater," noted Premise's
EVP-Sales Tripp Thornton.

For more information or to schedule a screening please contact: Premise
Media at (678) 546-5580 or email: Tripp@premisemedia.com

For media inquiries or to schedule an interview please contact:
laurakobbs@gmail.com.

For more information please go to:
http://mm.ninjitsuhosting.com/sites/all/modules/civicrm/extern/url.php?u=17602&qid=200557

This message was sent from:
12835 Kling Street, Ste 400
Studio City, 91604
 
Sounds like a no-news press release to me. They're only "releasing" it to theaters where somebody has rented the theater in advance and guaranteed them $1500 or more in revenue. While I'm sure they may attract a few takers, this is only a "re-release" in the same delusional minds that think people were afraid to see the movie the first time out because Ono had filed a lawsuit. What nonsense.

Basically, they're saying its theatrical run has finished, and they'd like to squeeze out a few dollars to pay for the DVDs they want to burn.
 
Last edited:
I'm impressed by the bluster of the whole "we will re-release it and allow millions of
Americans
to go to the box office" bit. Yes, all 300 million Americans will be "allowed" to see it, but those 300 million Americans already had a chance to see it and most of us gave it a pass. I seriously doubt millions more will go out of their way to see Stein's little lie-filled propaganda piece.
 
Oh barf. I guess not enough noise was made on the first round, so now they have to beat their little drums to see if they can hook any more victims to their propoganda piece.

Frivolous lawsuit? I'm surprised more people don't ask for their money back after being suckered into seeing that vomit fest.
 
What amazes me is that Ben Stein still gets product endorsement work after that and his anti-intellectual comments about science. I just heard him on a "Clear Eyes" ad here and you know, I'll go get Visine or generic artificial tears next time I need eye drops.
 

Back
Top Bottom