• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

ELF Member gets 5 years.

Roadtoad

Bufo Caminus Inedibilis
Joined
Nov 27, 2002
Messages
15,468
Location
Citrus Heights, CA
Student Convicted of Torching SUVs

LOS ANGELES - A graduate student was convicted Friday of setting fire to dozens of sport utility vehicles in an attack by radical environmentalists that caused $2.3 million in damage.

William Jensen Cottrell, 24, was found guilty of conspiracy and arson. The jury acquitted him of a more serious charge of attempting to use a destructive device — Molotov cocktails. That charge carried at least 30 years in prison.

He could get at least five years behind bars at sentencing March 12.

Cottrell, a doctoral candidate at the California Institute of Technology, was charged in a 2003 firebombing and vandalism spree at auto dealerships and homes in the San Gabriel Valley east of Los Angeles.

About 125 vehicles were damaged or destroyed. The vandals spray-painted polluter" and "smog machine" on some vehicles, along with "ELF," for the radical environmental group Earth Liberation Front.

-----

Seems to be a pretty light sentence. Any thoughts?
 
thought 1: fairly light sentence.

thought 2: How incredibly stupid. Now those people are going to collect on their insurance, and go buy a new SUV, causing more destruction to the planet than previously (due to the waste of the destroyed one).
 
roger said:
thought 1: fairly light sentence.

thought 2: How incredibly stupid. Now those people are going to collect on their insurance, and go buy a new SUV, causing more destruction to the planet than previously (due to the waste of the destroyed one).

No one ever accused these ELF people of being geniuses.
 
My only question is: what subject was he studying as a grad student?

Anybody want to start taking bets? Was it Humanities? Or was it "Cultural anthropology"? Or something else?

Place your guess here. What was his field of study?
 
Originally posted by Roadtoad
ELF Member gets 5 years.

[size=+2] So close to Christmas?!!![/size]

Originally posted by Roadtoad
About 125 vehicles were damaged or destroyed. The vandals spray-painted polluter" and "smog machine" on some vehicles, along with "ELF," for the radical environmental group Earth Liberation Front.

Oh, never mind.

Originally posted by Roadtoad
Seems to be a pretty light sentence. Any thoughts?

Yeah, it seems that way to me too. I don’t think we take ideologically inspired crimes very seriously unless someone gets killed.
 
jzs said:

Cheater. You were supposed to guess before Googling.

In any case, yes, he was a physics grad student. Supposedly majored in both math and physics at the University of Chicago to get his bachelor's degree. Not what I would've stereotypically expected from somebody who would do something like this. Go figure.

In an article written at the time of the investigation, a biology grad student at Cottrell's school had this to say, "the investigation, in light of our current government in Washington has led to a situation where it's difficult to feel that you can articulate your political views." I got a chuckle out of that.
 
What's ironic is that the burning SUV tires probably caused a great deal of harm to our environment. Also ironic is that he used molotovs - gasoline-filled bottles with a rag in them - when he should have used fallen dead branches and leaves collected in a hemp bag. Also ironic is the ostensible method of travel he used to get from one dealership to another - I am betting it wasn't a bicycle.

Oh, the irony.
 
Is it a light sentence? I don't know. What does manslaughter get these days in the same state?

The guy reaped at least a portion of what he deserved, but then again, what is the average sentence for manslaughter?

What's worth more, a person or a car, I wonder?
 
roger said:
thought 1: fairly light sentence.

thought 2: How incredibly stupid. Now those people are going to collect on their insurance, and go buy a new SUV, causing more destruction to the planet than previously (due to the waste of the destroyed one).

Thought 3: If you pay for car insurance, you are paying for his destruction.
 
Thought 4.

I wonder if the other fellas will be impressed with his silly political agenda in prison.

Bubba: What are you in for, little boy?

Cottrell: Trying to save mother nature.

Bubba: How nice. Now pick up that soap.
 
shuize said:
Thought 4.

I wonder if the other fellas will be impressed with his silly political agenda in prison.

Bubba: What are you in for, little boy?

Cottrell: Trying to save mother nature.

Bubba: How nice. Now pick up that soap.


It struck me that way as well. Perhaps five years is enough.

William Jensen Cottrell, 24,...
...Cottrell, a doctoral candidate ...

He should be pretty popular.
 
Jensen_150.jpg


Her new name is "Suzy".

I wonder if there is a civil suit brewing. They could garnish his wages like forever. That would be pretty funny, him underwriting Insurance companies that underwrite auto insurance.
 
Here's another thing I don't get about the anti-SUV stuff, and maybe it's just because I'm missing something. Isn't a major portion of how much you pollute not just due to the kind of car you drive but also how much you drive? I drive about 2.5 K per year. It happens that I have a gas efficient car but suppose for a minute I had an SUV. Wouldn't I be polluting less than someone with a regular car that drive 15 K per year? And unless the person that torches my SUV follows me around for a few months first, he has no idea how much I drive.

If they wanted to protest car pollution you'd think a better way would be to complain about sprawl and how cities and suburbs are set up in a way such that lots of people have no choice but to drive a lot.
 
He hasn't been sentenced yet folks!!

News story:
He could get at least five years behind bars at sentencing March 12.
He could get more, he could get less. But no more griping about the light sentence until he actually gets sentenced, m'kay?
 
Number Six said:
Here's another thing I don't get about the anti-SUV stuff, and maybe it's just because I'm missing something. Isn't a major portion of how much you pollute not just due to the kind of car you drive but also how much you drive? I drive about 2.5 K per year. It happens that I have a gas efficient car but suppose for a minute I had an SUV. Wouldn't I be polluting less than someone with a regular car that drive 15 K per year? And unless the person that torches my SUV follows me around for a few months first, he has no idea how much I drive.

If they wanted to protest car pollution you'd think a better way would be to complain about sprawl and how cities and suburbs are set up in a way such that lots of people have no choice but to drive a lot.

The irrational hatred of SUV's isn't motivated by environmental concerns. SUV's have become a symbol of that which these folks really hate: affluence.
 

Back
Top Bottom