E-mails 'hurt IQ more than pot'?

zakur

Illuminator
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Messages
3,264
Story
LONDON, England -- Workers distracted by phone calls, e-mails and text messages suffer a greater loss of IQ than a person smoking marijuana, a British study shows.

The constant interruptions reduce productivity and leave people feeling tired and lethargic, according to a survey carried out by TNS Research and commissioned by Hewlett Packard.

[...]

In 80 clinical trials, Dr. Glenn Wilson, a psychiatrist at King's College London University, monitored the IQ of workers throughout the day.

He found the IQ of those who tried to juggle messages and work fell by 10 points -- the equivalent to missing a whole night's sleep and more than double the 4-point fall seen after smoking marijuana.
Judging by the number of stupid hoax emails forwarded to me by friends and relatives, I say these numbers are spot on. :D
 
zakur said:
Judging by the number of stupid hoax emails forwarded to me by friends and relatives, I say these numbers are spot on.

I don't know if there was ever a study for this, but I have full agreement with all those I have asked that work output for employees is greatest when their boss isn't around (like on vacation) to bother them.
 
IQ is dependent on how confused you are?

That invalidates the whole idea of IQ.
 
Has anyone considered that IQ testing may also affect IQ?

But I want a portable IQ monitor. Is it like a headband with a digital display?
 
CFLarsen said:
IQ is dependent on how confused you are?

That invalidates the whole idea of IQ.

I imagine this is journalistic shorthand. For "IQ", read "scores on standardized tests."
 
Steven Howard said:
I imagine this is journalistic shorthand. For "IQ", read "scores on standardized tests."

I would beg to differ.

IQ is not a static number, and can vary by as much as ten points from test to test, even under ideal conditions.

Add to that the fact that no two IQ tests are identical, and you get all sorts of variables that make the IQ rating, at best, a ballpark figure...not a hard measurement.

Quite frankly, an IQ test is just another form of standardized test.

In any case, imagine taking an IQ test after a drinking binge, or after being awake the entire night, or while you are having to reply to emails. Of course it will lower your score. I really don't see what the issue is here.
 
CFLarsen said:
IQ is dependent on how confused you are?

That invalidates the whole idea of IQ.

More accurately, it shows yet another way in which the notion of IQ as presented by the popular press has been invalidated for at least 60 years.
 
Huntsman said:
Quite frankly, an IQ test is just another form of standardized test.

Yes, absolutely. That's pretty much what I meant, even though it's not exactly what I said.
 
But do e-mails hurt IQ more than a Powerpoint presentation?
 
But do e-mails hurt IQ more than a Powerpoint presentation?
That depends on wether your the authour of the PP presentation or the viewer.
If your the author, your already at a loss.
 
uruk said:
That depends on wether your the authour of the PP presentation or the viewer.
If your the author, your already at a loss.
Not if I have created the PowerPoint presentation - I make that program dance like a cat on a griddle.

Quick note: Anyone who uses 'Spiral in' animation deserves whatever special place Satan reserves for them in Hell.
 
Re: Re: E-mails 'hurt IQ more than pot'?

Just thinking said:
I don't know if there was ever a study for this, but I have full agreement with all those I have asked that work output for employees is greatest when their boss isn't around (like on vacation) to bother them.

----------------------------------------------------------

I always hate to work around the boss I am trying to impress. What happens is your mind starts thinking more about what the observer is thinking than you yourself thinking about what you should be thinking about.

The last time me and the boss teamed up on something, we got quick about it. The removal of a stove. Grease got on a newly laid carpet. I got out some mineral spirits to blot up the grease. I quickly went down the basement to get something. When I came back up, the boss was stomping laterally on a towel on the mineral spirits trying to hasten up the blotting process. He bunched up the glued down carpet irreprabley (sp.), due to his lack of knowledge that the thinner could melt the adhesive. *I* felt guilty because *I* am the one who put down the solvent which obviously loosened the glue. But if he wasn't in such a hurry and waited for me to come back up the stairs first, this would have never happened.

Similarly, I've seen two carpenters teaming up on some difficult project and the one fast worker would make the other not so fast worker work faster and before you knew it, they were botching stuff...having accidents. Just because there is this male macho thing often caused by one guy trying to show up the next guy, and out hussle him...and then the accidents happen.
 
Slightly off-topic...

During a clinical rotation I was on, I was at the tail-end of a 24-hour call. It was about 5:45 AM, and I had been up, without sleep, since about the same time the previous day. It was a weekend call and the service I was on really relied on medical students to do a large portion of the work.

Well, we had an automated note generation system. The way it works is that the notes on the patients are typed into the computer, and then they are printed out, sorted, signed, and then put in the chart. On this particular morning, I had been tasked to sort the notes so that, as we rounded, we could just insert them into the patients' charts.

Mind you, it had been a particular taxing day the previous day. There were about 70 patients on our service, and this was being covered by two residents and three medical students, me being one of them.

Anyway, I sat there with this stack of notes and started trying to sort them, normally a relatively easy task. I could not, for the life of me, get the damn things in order! I was going through them over and over again and just getting more and more baffled as to why, after I pulled one out of the back to put it in the correct order, it was still not in the right place. Finally, I just had to set it down and go do something else.

Shortly thereafter, one of the residents that were coming in to relieve our team asked me to look up a lab. I sat at the computer, typed in my username, and then - when it came time to enter the password - just drew a complete blank. I tried to recall my password, but just kept coming up with nothing. I entered something that I thought was close, but no dice. Finally, I had to ask one of the nurses to log in for me because I just couldn't remember my password. It was really scary. At that point, I think you should just relieve yourself and go home to sleep. But, unfortunately, the system is not set-up like that. :( At least now there is a federal law that caps work-hours to 80/week for residents. During that rotation, I was pulling about 95-100 hours/week. That law doesn't apply to students.

-TT
 
ThirdTwin:
Why do medical students get such brutal schedules? Isn't it more likely that some poor guy gets killed by someone at the end of a 24 hour shift than by someone at the end of a 12 hour shift?
 
Donks said:
ThirdTwin:
Why do medical students get such brutal schedules? Isn't it more likely that some poor guy gets killed by someone at the end of a 24 hour shift than by someone at the end of a 12 hour shift?

Well, thankfully (as of tomorrow) I'm officially done with the possibility of having to continue to suffer from that loophole. :D

But, I think that it has to do with two things: (1) we're not really covered under the federal legislation rules because we aren't paid. The "teeth" to the new law is that programs that aren't willing to comply risk losing accreditation, and hence funding. (2) We, as students, don't really have any real patient management responsibilities. For example, I may be "following" patients, but I don't write orders, I don't do any procedures (or anything else) unsupervised. Theoretically, anything I 'see' and 'do' should, as a student, should have already been 'seen' and 'done' by a resident. And, whenever we do anything other than listen to a chest or look in a throat, it's always done with 100% supervision (e.g., learning how to stitch, injecting medications, etc.). It's definitely not like it is on those silly TV shows like ER. So, the possibility of us actually "killing" someone is quite low. And, as you could see from my anecdote, I was just doing clerical work anyway (a.k.a. in the biz as "scut").

Now, during your intern year, on the other hand... let's just say that no one should plan on getting sick or scheduling any elective surgeries until at least late September. On that, I'm not joking.

-TT
 
ThirdTwin said:
Well, thankfully (as of tomorrow) I'm officially done with the possibility of having to continue to suffer from that loophole. :D
Well, it's past midnight around here so... Congratulations!

But, I think that it has to do with two things: (1) we're not really covered under the federal legislation rules because we aren't paid. The "teeth" to the new law is that programs that aren't willing to comply risk losing accreditation, and hence funding. (2) We, as students, don't really have any real patient management responsibilities. For example, I may be "following" patients, but I don't write orders, I don't do any procedures (or anything else) unsupervised. Theoretically, anything I 'see' and 'do' should, as a student, should have already been 'seen' and 'done' by a resident. And, whenever we do anything other than listen to a chest or look in a throat, it's always done with 100% supervision (e.g., learning how to stitch, injecting medications, etc.). It's definitely not like it is on those silly TV shows like ER. So, the possibility of us actually "killing" someone is quite low. And, as you could see from my anecdote, I was just doing clerical work anyway (a.k.a. in the biz as "scut").
So, should I get my info from Scrubs or Grey's Anatomy? :D

Now, during your intern year, on the other hand... let's just say that no one should plan on getting sick or scheduling any elective surgeries until at least late September. On that, I'm not joking.

-TT
Thanks for the info, I'll keep that in mind.
 
Robin said:
But do e-mails hurt IQ more than a Powerpoint presentation?

e-mail hurt i. lose track i. what? powerpoint double-plus good duckspeaker makes.
 
BillHoyt said:
e-mail hurt i. lose track i. what? powerpoint double-plus good duckspeaker makes.

yes, powerpoint good! learn! we must paradigmalize our total quality parameters to ensure maximization of efficiency and client satisfaction!
 

Back
Top Bottom