• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Do you think VASCO will find any aliens?

JeanTate

Illuminator
Joined
Nov 18, 2014
Messages
4,001
As in "Vanishing & Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations".

Described in a highly readable paper by Beatriz Villarroel and a huge cast of others, The Vanishing & Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations project: I. USNO objects missing in modern sky surveys and follow-up observations of a "missing star". Here's the abstract (I added hilite):

In this paper we report the current status of a new research program. The primary goal of the "Vanishing & Appearing Sources during a Century of Observations" (VASCO) project is to search for vanishing and appearing sources using existing survey data to find examples of exceptional astrophysical transients. The implications of finding such objects extend from traditional astrophysics fields to the more exotic searches for evidence of technologically advanced civilizations. In this first paper we present new, deeper observations of the tentative candidate discovered by Villarroel et al. (2016). We then perform the first searches for vanishing objects throughout the sky by comparing 600 million objects from the US Naval Observatory Catalogue (USNO) B1.0 down to a limiting magnitude of ∼20−21 with the recent Pan-STARRS Data Release-1 (DR1) with a limiting magnitude of ∼ 23.4. We find about 150,000 preliminary candidates that do not have any Pan-STARRS counterpart within a 30 arcsec radius. We show that these objects are redder and have larger proper motions than typical USNO objects. We visually examine the images for a subset of about 24,000 candidates, superseding the 2016 study with a sample ten times larger. We find about ∼ 100 point sources visible in only one epoch in the red band of the USNO which may be of interest in searches for strong M dwarf flares, high-redshift supernovae or other catagories of unidentified red transients.
 
evidence of technologically advanced civilizations... strong M dwarf flares, high-redshift supernovae or other catagories of unidentified red transients
How technologically advanced does a civilization have to be to create a supernova?

So far we have only managed to raise the temperature of our planet by 1ºC. I guess we have a way to go before we can call our own civilization 'technologically advanced'.
 
How technologically advanced does a civilization have to be to create a supernova?


I think it was either Asimov or Clarke who suggested that pulsars might be navigational beacons created by advanced aliens. And now NASA is studying pulsars as a possible aid to human space exploration because of course it is.
 
I think it was either Asimov or Clarke who suggested that pulsars might be navigational beacons created by advanced aliens.

And, if I recall correctly, addressed the possible criticism that the power requirements are absurdly large by saying "How do we know there aren't any stupid supercivilisations out there?"

Dave
 
And, if I recall correctly, addressed the possible criticism that the power requirements are absurdly large by saying "How do we know there aren't any stupid supercivilisations out there?"
I suspect we may soon find out why there are no stupid supercivilisations - they didn't survive the stupid regular civilization stage.
 
I think it was either Asimov or Clarke who suggested that pulsars might be navigational beacons created by advanced aliens.
Anthropomorphism - attributing human characteristics to natural phenomena.

Lightning isn't a naturally occurring electrostatic discharge, it's technologically advanced aliens throwing thunderbolts!
 
How technologically advanced does a civilization have to be to create a supernova?

So far we have only managed to raise the temperature of our planet by 1ºC. I guess we have a way to go before we can call our own civilization 'technologically advanced'.

I don't think anyone is suggesting that supernovae are created by alien civilizations. They are suggesting that supernovae are among the category of objects that they can discover with this approach. Another member of that category is "evidence of technologically advanced civilizations".
 
Anthropomorphism - attributing human characteristics to natural phenomena.

Lightning isn't a naturally occurring electrostatic discharge, it's technologically advanced aliens throwing thunderbolts!


Well, man, it was a science fiction story.
 
In reply to Roger Ramjets, Roboramma said:

I don't think anyone is suggesting that supernovae are created by alien civilizations. They are suggesting that supernovae are among the category of objects that they can discover with this approach. Another member of that category is "evidence of technologically advanced civilizations".

Yeah, people should read the abstract and not take Roger Ramjets extreme, creationist style, lying by misquoting seriously. I will never understand what possesses people to go to such lengths to lie about such esoteric stuff. The abstract actually says the opposite of what Ramjets quote (no, it's not a quote) lying would lead someone to believe.

Some of examples of "lying by ellipsis".

http://www.ooblick.com/text/patton/#Longest%20Ellipsis

I wonder what Ramjets could have done if he had access to the whole article?

Let me reiterate that the project is not just looking for aliens. Even if that is what the thread is focused the study itself is not focused on that.
 
Last edited:
How technologically advanced does a civilization have to be to create a supernova?

So far we have only managed to raise the temperature of our planet by 1ºC. I guess we have a way to go before we can call our own civilization 'technologically advanced'.

The major limitation is the lack of knowing what to look for. There's no guarantee that an advanced civilization is going to still be using radio as one example.
 
Follow up observations of a subset of the apparently appearing or vanishing sources (almost by definition points, at the angular resolution of the original observations) are likely to turn up some interesting things. As is almost always the case in astronomy when something new comes along.

Saying that VASCO most certainly won't find any aliens surely needs more justification than a bald "no", don't you think?
 
Saying that VASCO most certainly won't find any aliens surely needs more justification than a bald "no", don't you think?

Agreed. I personally doubt that they will find anything (with respect to aliens, the other categories of things that they might find seem likely to lead to some interesting results), but I don't see how it could be ruled out a priori.
 
Let me reiterate that the project is not just looking for aliens. Even if that is what the thread is focused the study itself is not focused on that.
I'm sure it isn't. The real goal is to make a living out of stargazing, but most people see little benefit in that so they had to sex it up with:-

"The implications of finding such objects extend from traditional astrophysics fields to the more exotic searches for evidence of technologically advanced civilizations"​

And yes, that is a direct quote from the abstract.

The abstract actually says the opposite of what Ramjets quote (no, it's not a quote) lying would lead someone to believe... Let me reiterate that the project is not just looking for aliens.
Did I say it was? No. but they are strongly implying that it is their ultimate goal.

From the article:-
The VASCO project may be a “conventional” astro-physics project, but it originated in the context of SETI, as described by Villarroel et al. (2016), who proposed to search surveys for vanished stars in our Galaxy as probes of “impossible effects” that could only be ascribed to an extraterrestrial technology...

For example, the quasar 3C273 has about 4 trillion times the luminosity of our Sun. Indeed, an AGN may be a significantly more effective target to build a Dyson sphere around.



Dyson sphere
A Dyson sphere is a hypothetical megastructure that completely encompasses a star and captures a large percentage of its power output... However, Dyson was not the first to advance this idea. He was inspired by the 1937 science fiction novel Star Maker, by Olaf Stapledon, and possibly by the works of J. D. Bernal, Raymond Z. Gallun, and Edgar Rice Burroughs...

Thus, a Dyson sphere, constructed by life forms not dissimilar to humans, who dwelled in proximity to a Sun-like star, made with materials similar to those available to humans, would most likely cause an increase in the amount of infrared radiation in the star system's emitted spectrum...

SETI has adopted these assumptions in their search, looking for such "infrared heavy" spectra from solar analogs. As of 2005 Fermilab has an ongoing survey for such spectra

IOW, fantasy dressed up as scientific research.
 
Last edited:
As much as I'd like to say maybe, it doesn't strike me as being likely. Dyson spheres in particular have always struck me as too far-fetched to plausibly exist.
 
If we imagine as a thought experiment that a planet similar to earth, inhabited by creatures similar to humans, and at a stage of technological development similar to our own exists relatively nearby in our own galaxy, say 50 ly away, would we be able to find it with current techniques? Obviously, they would not have a Dyson sphere, because they are only at a similar level of advancement to our own. But would there be a strong enough signal emanating from their home planet in our direction for our most powerful instruments to detect?
 
IOW, fantasy dressed up as scientific research.

Forming hypothesis and testing them (looking at the observational evidence) seems to be precisely science to me. If you're starting from the presumption that there are no extraterrestrial civilizations, then of course it seems silly to look for them, but at present we simply don't know one way or the other, so your presumption isn't justified.

Looking seems far more scientific than presuming to already know the answer.
 
If we imagine as a thought experiment that a planet similar to earth, inhabited by creatures similar to humans, and at a stage of technological development similar to our own exists relatively nearby in our own galaxy, say 50 ly away, would we be able to find it with current techniques? Obviously, they would not have a Dyson sphere, because they are only at a similar level of advancement to our own. But would there be a strong enough signal emanating from their home planet in our direction for our most powerful instruments to detect?

Possibly. Some of the upcoming telescopes (James Webb is due to launch soon, but there are several other big telescopes coming online soon) would make doing so much easier.

For instance I saw a paper recently that was talking about looking for the "red edge", the spectrum of light specific to plant life, in directly imaged exoplanets. Not possible with current telescopes, but possible with telescopes coming online in the next decade or so.

That's a test for life. As to some sort of civilization like our own, I haven't heard of anything we could look for (atmospheric composition? something to do with rate of change in something?) but I wouldn't rule it out entirely.
 

Back
Top Bottom