Just wondering, every troofer I encounter claims he testified under oath, but I have been unable to confirm this. This page says that all testimony in 2004 was under oath, but Mineta testified in 2003. Can anyone clarify this?
Thanks. Not that I think he was lying, just wrong.
I'm afraid I couldn't find any source saying Minea was under oath during his testimony.Since when can you not be mistaken when testifying under oath? We had a case here were a guy testified under oath that he saw a policeman shoot an unarmed man. The other 10-12 witnesses all said that the shootee was armed with a basebat. Just because the first one was wrong, doesn't mean he was lying (in this case he simply misinterpreted what he was seeing and assumed that the silver bat was actually a silver stripe on the guy's clothing.)