Supercharts
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2002
- Messages
- 1,182
Great satire by Dennis Miller! 
http://opinionjournal.com/
[You may have to register just once to read this satire]
OUT OF THE LOUPE
'Why Are We in Iraq?'
Meet Norman Mailer, Third Cousin of the Rational Op-Ed.
BY DENNIS MILLER
Monday, May 5, 2003 12:01 a.m.
"With their dominance in sport, at work and at home eroded, Bush thought white American men needed to know they were still good at something. That's where Iraq came in. . . .
"The great white stars of yesteryear were for the most part gone, gone in football, in basketball, in boxing, and half-gone in baseball. . . . On the other hand, the good white American male still had the Armed Forces."--Norman Mailer, writing in the London Times' op-ed page last week
***
Stuff deleted
***
Mr. Mailer was the Father of the Nonfiction Novel and now he can also claim lineage as the distant, addled Third Cousin of the Rational Op-Ed. Studying at the Sorbonne as a young man obviously made a deep impression on him because this thing reads like Jacques Chirac's Dream Journal.
With six marriages under his belt, one would assume Mr. Mailer has a stranglehold on warfare. One would be wrong.
His basic contention is that we went to war with Iraq because with the dominance of white American men in the boxing ring, the office and the home front eroded, George W. Bush thought they needed to know they were still good at something. Mr. Mailer has a degree in aeronautical engineering from Harvard so he had to know that argument wouldn't fly. But then again, maybe this claptrap is just a grand put-on. The fact that I and many others can't differentiate anymore does not auger well for Norm's legend.
***
Stuff deleted
***
Copyright © 2003 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
http://opinionjournal.com/
[You may have to register just once to read this satire]
OUT OF THE LOUPE
'Why Are We in Iraq?'
Meet Norman Mailer, Third Cousin of the Rational Op-Ed.
BY DENNIS MILLER
Monday, May 5, 2003 12:01 a.m.
"With their dominance in sport, at work and at home eroded, Bush thought white American men needed to know they were still good at something. That's where Iraq came in. . . .
"The great white stars of yesteryear were for the most part gone, gone in football, in basketball, in boxing, and half-gone in baseball. . . . On the other hand, the good white American male still had the Armed Forces."--Norman Mailer, writing in the London Times' op-ed page last week
***
Stuff deleted
***
Mr. Mailer was the Father of the Nonfiction Novel and now he can also claim lineage as the distant, addled Third Cousin of the Rational Op-Ed. Studying at the Sorbonne as a young man obviously made a deep impression on him because this thing reads like Jacques Chirac's Dream Journal.
With six marriages under his belt, one would assume Mr. Mailer has a stranglehold on warfare. One would be wrong.
His basic contention is that we went to war with Iraq because with the dominance of white American men in the boxing ring, the office and the home front eroded, George W. Bush thought they needed to know they were still good at something. Mr. Mailer has a degree in aeronautical engineering from Harvard so he had to know that argument wouldn't fly. But then again, maybe this claptrap is just a grand put-on. The fact that I and many others can't differentiate anymore does not auger well for Norm's legend.
***
Stuff deleted
***
Copyright © 2003 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
